Section 8(B)(4) Of The Nlra

10 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Painters Dist. Council NO. 38, Bhd. OF Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers OF Am., AFL-CIO v. Edgewood Contracting Co.
  416 F.2d 1081· 5th Cir.· 1969-10-07 ·cited 40×
  The court held that the National Labor Relations Board's finding of a secondary boycott violation was res judicata on the issue of liability in a subsequent damage suit under section 303, because the Board acted in a judicial capacity and the parties had a full opportunity to lit
• Drivers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
  361 F.2d 547· D.C. Cir.· 1966-05-06 ·cited 32×
  A contract clause protecting employees' refusal to cross secondary picket lines violates Section 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, and the construction industry proviso does not apply to ready-mix concrete delivery drivers.
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Rockaway News Supply Co., Inc.
  197 F.2d 111· 2d Cir.· 1952-05-12 ·cited 26×
  The court held that a union member does not lose statutory protection by refusing to cross a picket line, and the Board's order should be enforced.
• Ramey Constr. Co. Inc. v. Local Union NO. 544
  472 F.2d 1127· 5th Cir.· 1973-01-31 ·cited 20×
  The court held that common situs picketing is lawful if its primary object is to pressure the primary employer, even if secondary effects occur, provided the picketing is conducted in a manner least calculated to induce secondary effects.
• Soft Drink Workers Union Local 812 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
  657 F.2d 1252· D.C. Cir.· 1980-10-03 ·cited 16×
  The court held that peaceful consumer picketing aimed at promoting local products, without evidence of intent to cause substantial economic harm to the secondary employer or to force them to cease dealing with a primary employer, does not fall within the 'isolated evil' proscribe
• Grain Elevator v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
  376 F.2d 774· D.C. Cir.· 1967-03-31 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the National Labor Relations Board reasonably applied its rule requiring lawful on-scene picketing by a primary union to justify non-picketing appeals by a secondary union when the primary employer's situs is movable and located at a secondary employer's premi
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 30
  549 F.2d 698· 9th Cir.· 1977-03-04 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the six-month statute of limitations for unfair labor practice charges begins to run when the employee receives notice of the fine, not when the union votes to impose it, and that fining an employee for crossing an illegal picket line violates the National Lab
• Limbach Co. v. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n
  949 F.2d 1211· 3d Cir.· 1991-07-09 ·cited 7×
  The court held that the single employer doctrine is inapplicable to double-breasted enterprises for the purpose of applying secondary boycott provisions under the NLRA.
• Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, AFL-CIO v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
  723 F.2d 963· D.C. Cir.· 1983-12-20 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the National Labor Relations Board has jurisdiction over a union's refusal to handle goods destined for or arriving from a foreign country, even if a foreign ship is involved, when the boycott affects U.S. foreign policy and risks conflicting state court decis
• The Atchison v. Locals NOS. 70
  511 F.2d 1193· 9th Cir.· 1975-02-18 ·cited 4×
  The court held that it lacked jurisdiction over the claims because the National Labor Relations Act preemption doctrine barred federal court jurisdiction for conduct arguably prohibited or protected by the Act, and statutory exceptions did not apply.