Scope Of Injunctions

21 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Marshfield Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
  324 F.2d 333· 8th Cir.· 1963-11-20 ·cited 62×
  The National Labor Relations Board's findings of unfair labor practices and its order, including the award of interest on back pay and the scope of the cease and desist order, were supported by substantial evidence and within its statutory authority.
• Moore v. City Dry Cleaners Laundry
  41 So. 2d 865· Fla.· 1949-07-26 ·cited 60×
  This case involves a union's picketing and associated activities against a laundry business. The court affirmed most of the injunction against the union due to violence and intimidation but reversed a portion that broadly prohibited advertising or discussing the strike, citing fr
• Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Cosmair, Inc.
  821 F.2d 1085· 5th Cir.· 1987-07-16 ·cited 46×
  The court held that stopping severance pay after an employee filed an ADEA charge constituted unlawful retaliation, and that a waiver of the right to file such a charge is void as against public policy.
• NEW York Tel. Co. v. Commc'ns Workers OF Am., AFL-CIO
  445 F.2d 39· 2d Cir.· 1971-06-22 ·cited 43×
  The court should not interpret a consent order's scope without a hearing, even if its language appears unambiguous, when there's a dispute about the parties' intent.
• Save OUR Ecosystems v. Clark
  747 F.2d 1240· 9th Cir.· 1984-01-27 ·cited 40×
  The court held that the USFS and BLM violated NEPA by failing to adequately prepare worst-case analyses and environmental assessments, and that the injunctions should have covered the entire spraying programs, not just portions.
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. The Great Atl. & Pac. TEA Co., Inc.
  406 F.2d 1173· 5th Cir.· 1969-01-28 ·cited 30×
  The court held that the Board's order should be enforced as modified, limiting the injunction to conduct like or related to the violations found.
• Wirtz v. Ocala GAS Co., Inc.
  336 F.2d 236· 5th Cir.· 1964-09-02 ·cited 23×
  A merger does not immunize a successor corporation from a prior Fair Labor Standards Act consent decree, and individuals with knowledge of the decree can be held in contempt for violations.
• United States v. City OF Birmingham
  727 F.2d 560· 6th Cir.· 1984-02-08 ·cited 20×
  The court held that the City's interference with the development of low-income housing was racially motivated and affirmed the district court's judgment, modifying the injunction to prohibit conduct specifically because of race or discriminatory motive.
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 111, United Bhd. OF Carpenters & Joiners OF Am., AFL-CIO
  278 F.2d 823· 1st Cir.· 1960-05-24 ·cited 20×
  The court held that a disgorgement order was justified by the facts of illegal preference, but an order enjoining other employers was overly broad without specific findings.
• The Drummond Co. v. Dist. 20
  598 F.2d 381· 5th Cir.· 1979-07-05 ·cited 18×
  Contempt adjudications imposing unconditional fines are appealable final orders, but the injunction was improperly applied to work stoppages remote in time from the original dispute.
• Alley v. U.S. Dep't OF Health & Human Servs.
  590 F.3d 1195· 11th Cir.· 2009-12-18 ·cited 16×
  Jennifer Alley sought to compel the Department of Health and Human Services to disclose Medicare claims data under the Freedom of Information Act, but HHS refused based on a 1979 injunction issued in Florida Medical Association v. Department of Health, Education & Welfare that ba
• United States v. Charmer Indus., Inc.
  722 F.2d 1073· 2d Cir.· 1983-11-30 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the modified order allowing the use of information derived from a confidential presentence report was inconsistent with its prior directive, and that the prohibition on use must extend to derivative information.
• Bowles v. Leithold
  155 F.2d 124· 3d Cir.· 1945-12-27 ·cited 6×
  The court held that an injunction against future price ceiling violations was permissible even without proof of past price violations, based on the defendants' failure to comply with record-keeping regulations.
• United States v. Robinson
  83 F.4th 868· 11th Cir.· 2023-09-28 ·cited 5×
  Diana Robinson was convicted of criminal contempt for violating a 2017 injunction that TASER obtained against Phazzer Electronics, which had prohibited the sale of certain stun guns. The Eleventh Circuit vacated Robinson's conviction, holding that the government failed to prove R
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 450, Int'l Union OF Operating Eng'rs, AFL-CIO
  275 F.2d 413· 5th Cir.· 1960-02-18 ·cited 5×
  The court, in part, enforced the Board's order but dissented from its application to 'any other employers' beyond the specific parties and issues presented.
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kinner Motors, Inc.
  152 F.2d 816· 9th Cir.· 1945-12-29 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the National Labor Relations Board's order to cease and desist from interfering with employees' rights was overly broad and should be amended by striking the omnibus paragraph. The court also affirmed the Board's order for reinstatement of discharged employees
• Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
  135 F.2d 891· 7th Cir.· 1943-05-22 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Board's order finding the petitioner guilty of unfair labor practices in dominating and interfering with the Utility Employes Union (U.E.U.) was not supported by substantial evidence, and that the cease and desist order was overly broad.
• COK v. Fam. Court OF R.I.
  985 F.2d 32· 1st Cir.· 1993-02-09 ·cited 2×
  The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the district court's remand order and vacated the injunction against the plaintiff's filings, remanding for further proceedings.
• Cooper v. Honorable Enoch T. NIX
  496 F.2d 1285· 5th Cir.· 1974-07-18 ·cited 2×
  The court held that while an age-based exemption in university housing regulations violated equal protection, the permanent injunction improperly expanded the exemption beyond the scope of the violation.
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers Union, Afl-Cio
  286 F.2d 950· 4th Cir.· 1961-01-04
  The court held that picketing a neutral employer to encourage its employees to refuse to handle goods from a struck manufacturer constitutes an unfair labor practice under the Labor Management Relations Act, and the NLRB's order to cease and desist was enforceable.
• United States v. Kane
  205 F.2d 274· 3d Cir.· 1953-06-19
  The court held that a $400 payment ordered to the U.S. Treasury, which was in the nature of a penalty, could not be imposed when the suit was brought after the one-year statute of limitations for penalties had expired.