Rule 15(a)

311 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Elema-Schonander, Inc. v. K.C.F. Med. Supply Co., Inc.
  869 F.2d 1124· 8th Cir.· 1989-03-14
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend the answer to assert a counterclaim, nor in granting summary judgment.
• Boyd v. United States
  861 F.2d 106· 5th Cir.· 1988-11-30
  The court held that the FmHA's foreclosure procedures did not violate Boyd's Fifth Amendment due process rights, as he waived his opportunity for a hearing by failing to make a timely written request.
• Coral v. Gavino Gonse
  330 F.2d 997· 4th Cir.· 1964-04-15
  The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the plaintiff leave to amend his complaint to change his claimed state of residency after evidence strongly indicated the defendant resided in the same state, thus destroying diversity jurisdiction.
• Lonibeth Oster v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.
  274 F.2d 447· 9th Cir.· 1959-12-28
  The court held that the complaints, particularly the second one, were likely sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss under notice pleading standards.
• Brazier v. The Great Atl. & Pac. TEA Co.
  256 F.2d 96· 5th Cir.· 1958-06-13
  The court held that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing the complaint without leave to amend, as justice required allowing the plaintiff an opportunity to amend her complaint.
• Acme Distrib. Co. v. Rorie
  183 F.2d 694· 10th Cir.· 1950-07-26
  The court held that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of the defendants' actual damages and in refusing to allow amendment of the pleadings to conform to the evidence presented.