Rule 15, Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure

208 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Sondra Tamimi v. Howard Johnson Co.
  807 F.2d 1550· 11th Cir.· 1987-01-20
  The court held that the district court's findings of sex discrimination were not clearly erroneous, affirming the judgment for the plaintiff.
• United States v. C. J. Elec. Contractors, Inc.
  535 F.2d 1326· 1st Cir.· 1976-05-13
  The court held that Capitol should be allowed to file a supplemental pleading to bring its Miller Act claim into compliance, even if the original suit was premature.
• United States v. Goldman
  450 F.2d 873· 1st Cir.· 1971-11-09
  The court held that the evidence of morphine sulphate did not exceed the bill of particulars and that the defendant's objection to the jury instructions was untimely.
• Marcel L. Vadenais and Jean M. Vadenais v. Christina
  325 F.2d 157· 2d Cir.· 1963-11-04
  The court held that the trial court erred in not allowing the correction of a misnomer in the defendant's name, even after the statute of limitations had run.
• McGOWAN v. Wahlstrom
  255 F.2d 134· 8th Cir.· 1958-05-13
  The court held that a federal court lacks jurisdiction to establish a lost will, and a prior state court adjudication on the validity of the will is binding on the plaintiff.