-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-01-21
The court held that the plaintiff's claims for racial discrimination and age discrimination failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-01-10
The court held that the counterclaim-plaintiff sufficiently alleged civil conspiracy and that counterclaims against a third-party are permissible if also asserted against an original party.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-12-17
A state law medical malpractice claim is not cognizable in federal court and does not confer subject matter jurisdiction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-10-03
A prisoner does not have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in an inmate grievance procedure, and therefore, a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on the denial or handling of such a grievance fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-13
The court held that the plaintiffs' claims for relief from a state court order and for bad faith were premature and unripe, warranting dismissal without prejudice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-08-23
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and was therefore dismissed.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2016-05-20
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of Rite Aid's third-party complaint against Michael Spence's father. The court held that Rite Aid failed to plead the requisite elements for its claims of invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, n
-
Del. Ch.·
2015-06-23
The Court largely denied defendants' motions to dismiss, finding that plaintiff stated claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty, civil
-
Del. Ch.·
2013-06-28
The Court of Chancery denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's claims for declaratory and injunctive relief. The court found that the plaintiff had stated a claim upon which relief could be granted regarding its interpretation of a "knowledge" qualifier in the sto
-
733 F. Supp. 2d 1336·
S.D. Fla.·
2010-08-18
The district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's challenge to the defendant's insourcing decision, as exclusive jurisdiction lies with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
-
Del. Ch.·
2010-03-03
The Court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the shareholder derivative complaint. The Court found that the complaint adequately pleaded demand futility, as the directors faced a substantial threat of personal liability due to their involvement in insider trading and a comp
-
Del. Ch.·
2000-10-19
The Court of Chancery granted Tidewater's motion to dismiss Count I, finding that Section 9.4 of the Stock Purchase Agreement did not obligate Tidewater to pay Universal's increased franchise tax liability. However, the Court denied the motion to dismiss Counts II, III, IV, and V
-
962 F.2d 372·
4th Cir.·
1992-05-06
The court held that a service station can constitute a "service or facility" under Maryland law, and allegations that it was furnished on unequal terms state a cause of action.
-
961 F.2d 996·
1st Cir.·
1992-04-16
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the inmate's pro se complaint, as it stated cognizable claims under Section 1983 and state law.
-
889 F.2d 524·
4th Cir.·
1989-11-17
The court held that the denial of a preliminary injunction was not an abuse of discretion, and that the dismissal of certain claims was proper, but remanded for leave to amend the Sherman Act § 2 claim.
-
Del. Ch.·
1976-04-06
The court considered interlocutory appeals concerning a protective order for financial records and the dismissal of a complaint related to an alleged joint venture for real estate development.