-
595 F.2d 164·
3d Cir.·
1979-03-16
·cited 125×
The court held that a manufacturer's termination of a customer at the urging of a competitor, motivated by price competition, may constitute a per se violation of the Sherman Act, even without proof of broader market effects.
-
769 So. 2d 1105·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2000-10-04
·cited 32×
Martin Petroleum sued Amerada Hess for tortious interference after Hess supplied gasoline to Martin's customer Bamco, causing Bamco to terminate its contract with Martin. The court affirmed summary judgment for Hess, holding that Hess did not tortiously interfere because Bamco in
-
723 So. 2d 182·
Fla.·
1998-10-15
·cited 16×
A parent corporation may be held liable for tortious interference with a business relationship when it purchases a subsidiary as a competitor, knowing this will cause an affiliate subsidiary to breach its non-compete obligation to the franchisee, provided the tortious interferenc
-
618 F.2d 1340·
9th Cir.·
1980-04-09
·cited 14×
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove an adverse effect on competition under the rule of reason for the antitrust claim and lacked evidence of motive to injure for the tortious interference claim.
-
898 F.2d 914·
3d Cir.·
1990-03-09
·cited 13×
The court held that the district court erred in granting judgment for Blue Cross/Blue Shield under Rule 50(b) and in dismissing abuse of process claims, reversing those decisions.
-
839 F.2d 155·
3d Cir.·
1988-02-09
·cited 10×
The court held that defendants' actions in reporting nursing home violations to authorities and eliciting public interest are protected by the right to petition the government and cannot serve as the basis for tort liability.
-
880 F.2d 1178·
10th Cir.·
1989-07-25
·cited 6×
The court held that the district court erred in granting a directed verdict, as there was sufficient evidence for a jury to find the defendant personally liable for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty and for intentional interference with contract.
-
870 F.2d 435·
8th Cir.·
1989-03-13
·cited 6×
The court held that the district court correctly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict because there was no direct contractual relationship between the plaintiff and K-Mart, K-Mart did not improperly interfere with the ground lease, and the plaintiff was not an intended th
-
794 F.2d 352·
8th Cir.·
1986-06-25
·cited 6×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a cause of action for breach of contract and tortious interference with business relationships.
-
772 F.2d 802·
11th Cir.·
1985-09-30
·cited 6×
The court held that the damages award to HSC-TCI was improper because it did not prevail on its counterclaims, and the bond proceeds were to be distributed according to the terms of the court's order and Admiralty Rule E(7).
-
717 F.2d 671·
2d Cir.·
1983-09-01
·cited 6×
-
616 So. 2d 1070·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1993-04-06
·cited 5×
Peninsula Federal Savings and Loan Association appeals a judgment against it for damages and denying its counterclaim for foreclosure of a construction loan. The court reverses the tort and punitive damages awards, affirming that Peninsula properly negotiated a subordination agre
-
922 F. Supp. 558·
M.D. Fla.·
1995-09-05
·cited 2×
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove damages with sufficient certainty, warranting judgment as a matter of law for the defendant.
-
941 F.2d 1361·
8th Cir.·
1991-08-14
·cited 2×
The court held that awarding both liquidated and compensatory damages for the same conduct, or for overlapping breaches, is improper and can render the liquidated damages clause a penalty.
-
624 F.2d 486·
4th Cir.·
1980-06-24
·cited 2×
A claim against an SBA official for breach of an oral agreement to sell instruments of indebtedness is not viable because the official lacked authority to enter such a contract, and the plaintiffs were chargeable with knowledge of this lack of authority.
-
613 F.2d 169·
7th Cir.·
1980-01-10
·cited 2×
The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of racial discrimination against Blockman, but insufficient evidence to support the Leadership Council's claim of interference with contractual relations.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-06-18
The court held that restrictive covenants in employment agreements were lawful, valid, and enforceable, and that former employees breached these covenants by failing to provide notice and by soliciting clients and employees.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2021-07-20
The court denied the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction over Lead Stories, LLC, finding sufficient basis for specific personal jurisdiction under Delaware's long-arm statute. However, the court granted the defendants' motions to dismiss for failure to state a cla
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2004-04-07
The court denied all motions for summary judgment. The reasonableness of the defendants' actions in handling the plaintiff's claim, the extreme and outrageous nature of their conduct, whether their interference with the contract was improper, and whether their actions constituted
-
992 F.2d 1106·
10th Cir.·
1993-05-03
The court held that the defendants' actions in terminating the plaintiff's staff privileges were justified under Oklahoma law, affirming the grant of summary judgment.
-
963 F.2d 125·
6th Cir.·
1992-04-29
The court held that Mansfield Scientific was not liable for intentional inducement of contractual breach because its actions were privileged under Ohio law, lacking the requisite intent to harm Kand Medical.
-
631 F.2d 1189·
5th Cir.·
1980-12-03
The court denied the application for rehearing, finding that the newly cited case did not alter the analysis of when the statute of limitations accrues.