-
575 So. 2d 683·
Fla. 5th DCA·
1991-01-31
·cited 59×
Parents and sibling of a deceased fourteen-year-old sued police officers for displaying autopsy photographs and videotape. The court reversed summary judgment, holding that officers are not automatically immune from tort liability simply because autopsy materials are public recor
-
527 F.2d 1122·
9th Cir.·
1975-12-05
·cited 18×
The court held that the First Amendment does not automatically privilege truthful publications of private facts, and factual questions regarding newsworthiness and community mores may require jury determination, thus reversing the denial of summary judgment for reconsideration.
-
717 So. 2d 63·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1998-06-10
·cited 15×
The court held that summary judgment was improperly granted on the invasion of privacy claim and that claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel should be reinstated.
-
665 F.2d 305·
10th Cir.·
1981-11-30
·cited 15×
The court held that the publication of private facts, including the plaintiff's name, photograph, and personal history, was substantially relevant to a newsworthy topic and thus protected by the First Amendment, and that the false light claim was procedurally abandoned.
-
799 F.2d 1000·
5th Cir.·
1986-09-15
·cited 12×
The court held that a photographic release signed by a mother for her minor children was valid under California law, and that the publication of the children's photographs in Hustler magazine, in the context of book reviews and excerpts, did not constitute an invasion of privacy
-
801 F.2d 46·
2d Cir.·
1986-09-10
·cited 10×
The court held that a false light invasion of privacy claim requires the portrayal to be substantially false and highly offensive to a reasonable person, and that truth is a complete defense.
-
204 F. Supp. 2d 1338·
M.D. Fla.·
2002-05-09
·cited 9×
The court held that the marketing and distribution of an expressive work like a motion picture, even if profitable, does not constitute a "commercial purpose" under Florida Statute § 540.08, and that relatives cannot bring false light or public disclosure of private facts claims
-
909 F.2d 512·
D.C. Cir.·
1990-07-13
·cited 7×
The court held that publications concerning a public official's fitness for office and potential drug testing improprieties are matters of public concern, barring invasion of privacy claims for private facts. However, statements implying drug use or bribery by a police officer co
-
732 F. Supp. 1145·
S.D. Fla.·
1990-02-23
·cited 4×
The court held that publishing a photograph taken in public and facts from public records, which had already been widely publicized, does not constitute an invasion of privacy under Florida law.
-
828 F.2d 270·
5th Cir.·
1987-09-29
·cited 2×
The court held that insufficient publicity existed to support a false light invasion of privacy claim, but affirmed liability for misappropriation of name. The court also affirmed lost earnings damages but vacated exemplary damages.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2016-05-20
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of Rite Aid's third-party complaint against Michael Spence's father. The court held that Rite Aid failed to plead the requisite elements for its claims of invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, n
-
814 F.2d 544·
8th Cir.·
1987-03-24
The court held that the defendant's conduct, while negligent, did not rise to the level required for tort recovery under Arkansas law for outrageous conduct, invasion of privacy, or negligent infliction of emotional distress, and that the relevant statute did not create a private
-
571 F.2d 411·
8th Cir.·
1978-02-21
The court held that the collection and retention of past insurance history by Equifax did not constitute an invasion of privacy by unreasonable intrusion, but the dissent argues there was sufficient evidence of 'publicity' for a public disclosure claim.