-
Del. Ch.·
2018-10-26
The Court granted in part Plaintiff Cabela's motion for a preliminary injunction, enforcing the confidentiality and nonsolicitation provisions of the agreements between Cabela's and its former employees. The Court found that while the choice-of-law provision in the agreements fav
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2018-05-16
The court granted Plaintiffs' motion for entry of final judgment and prejudgment interest. The court held that Delaware substantive law applies under the law of the case doctrine and that final judgment is appropriate because the insurers denied coverage solely on the basis that
-
Del. C.P.·
2018-05-02
The Court vacated the arbitration awards for Respondents Medora and Griffin, finding that the arbitrator exceeded his authority and manifestly disregarded the law by applying Pennsylvania law despite contractual choice-of-law provisions favoring Delaware. The Court affirmed the a
-
Del. Ch.·
2015-09-30
The Delaware Court of Chancery denied the defendant's motion to dismiss a defamation lawsuit. The court found that the plaintiffs had sufficiently pleaded claims for defamation arising from articles published in 2012 and 2014. The court held that the statute of limitations defens
-
Del.·
2013-10-04
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the Court of Chancery's judgment. It held that the Court of Chancery properly declined to exercise jurisdiction over the 1960 Trusts because New Jersey courts retained primary supervision. However, the Court reverse
-
Del.·
2013-08-16
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court's decision to apply Texas substantive law and Delaware procedural law, finding that the plaintiffs waived arguments for California or Delaware substantive law. However, the Court remanded the case for the Superior Court to de
-
Del. Ch.·
2013-03-06
The court held that New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (N.Y. C.P.L.R.) 3219 is procedural, not substantive, and therefore should not be applied in this Delaware action, despite a choice of law provision in the contract selecting New York substantive law. The court reasoned tha
-
Del. Ch.·
2012-12-10
The petitions are denied because Delaware law does not govern the trusts, as each trust affirmatively selects the governing law of a different jurisdiction (New York or New Jersey). Furthermore, the requests for declaratory judgments regarding trustee resignations and successor a
-
Del.·
2010-11-08
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court's judgment, holding that Delaware law applied to the uninsured motorist (UM) benefits claim. The Court found that Delaware had the most significant relationship to the parties and the dispute, and that Delaware's public polic
-
Del. Ch.·
2010-05-31
The court held that Delaware law applies to communications involving 3Com's investment banker, finding that Delaware has the most significant relationship to the communications due to the parties' selection of Delaware law and forum for their merger agreement. Consequently, there
-
Del. Ch.·
2007-12-21
The court denied the plaintiffs' request for a declaratory judgment of rescission, finding it moot. The court found the defendant, NIIS, liable to Underwriters for negligent misrepresentation, awarding damages for legal and claims handling expenses but denying recovery for commis
-
192 F. Supp. 2d 1351·
M.D. Fla.·
2002-02-19
The court denied the defendants' motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings, finding that the statute of limitations did not bar the claims and that the plaintiffs had standing and stated valid causes of action.
-
976 F.2d 561·
9th Cir.·
1992-10-01
The dissent argues that the place of payment, not issuance, should be considered the place of performance for a letter of credit, especially when performance is legal at the payment location.
-
615 F.2d 944·
2d Cir.·
1980-01-28