-
Fla. 6th DCA·
2026-05-15
A district court has jurisdiction under Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(v) to review a nonfinal order granting summary judgment that determines a party is not entitled to workers' compensation immunity as a matter of law, even without explicit language stating so, based on the ord
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-09-22
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for default judgment against all defendants because the motion failed to address prior court orders and contained numerous deficiencies in pleading and proof.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-08-16
The court held that additional information is required regarding service of process and choice of law before ruling on a motion for partial default judgment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-18
The court granted default judgment on claims of conversion, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, and constructive trust, but denied the RICO claim and requested permanent injunction, requiring the plaintiff to submit a precise damages calculation.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-02-28
The court granted default judgment for conversion but denied claims for RICO, unjust enrichment, and constructive trust due to lack of adequate remedy at law or insufficient allegations.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-02-26
The court held that the negligence claim was not preempted, but the fraudulent misrepresentation claim failed to meet pleading standards and was dismissed with leave to amend. The court also dismissed the Nebraska Consumer Protection Act claim with prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-11-14
Florida law applies to the counterclaims because Florida has the most significant relationship to the dispute, particularly due to the location of the conduct causing the alleged injury.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-26
A joint account agreement allowing either owner to withdraw funds governs the disposition of those funds, even after the death of another joint owner, unless a supervening agreement exists.
-
218 So. 3d 981·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2017-05-05
In this conflict of laws case, the Fifth District Court of Appeal held that Florida's dangerous instrumentality doctrine applies to a motor vehicle accident occurring in South Carolina where both the vehicle owner and injured plaintiff are Florida residents. The court reversed su
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2016-05-04
The Delaware Superior Court granted defendants' motion to dismiss, holding that plaintiffs' claims for negligence and wrongful death were time-barred under Bangladesh's one-year statute of limitations and that plaintiffs failed to state a prima facie case for negligence because d
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2015-11-24
The court denied motions by defendants Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC (BATO) and Ford Motor Company (Ford) to apply the laws of Ohio and Michigan, respectively, to the plaintiff's claims. The court held that Delaware law should apply to the dispute, finding that Delawa
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2014-06-10
The court held that Texas law has the most significant relationship to the issues of liability, damages, and remedies in this products liability action arising from a helicopter crash in Mexico. Therefore, the court granted the plaintiffs' motion to apply Texas law to liability a
-
1991 WL 70650·
S.D. Fla.·
2013-05-16
The court held that the Bahamas is a more appropriate and convenient forum for the action, and therefore dismissed the case on the grounds of forum non conveniens.
-
680 F.2d 427·
5th Cir.·
1982-07-16
The court held that Texas law applied because Texas had the most significant relationship to the occurrence and parties, despite the accident's proximity to the state line.