-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-13
The court held that the defendants' motion to exclude expert testimony and demonstrative exhibits should be denied because the expert did not change his core opinions and the exhibits were not prejudicial.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-08
The court granted in part and denied in part the defendant's motion to preclude expert testimony, finding the expert qualified and certain opinions admissible.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-08
The court held that the opinions of Dr. Woo and Dr. Levy were sufficiently reliable and admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, but excluded certain opinions of Kyle Victor regarding regulatory compliance as impermissible legal conclusions.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2024-12-20
The court held that Dr. Dennis Rosen qualifies as an expert in pediatric pulmonology and his testimony is admissible under Delaware Rule of Evidence 702. While his opinion relies in part on biomechanical conclusions, his expertise in pediatric pulmonology forms the core of his an
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2024-12-20
The court held that Dr. Benjamin Hoffman qualifies as an expert on infant sleep conditions and his testimony is admissible under Delaware Rule of Evidence 702. While his opinion touches on biomechanical concepts, it is not solely a biomechanical opinion. The court found that Hoff
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-11-20
The court held that while an expert's opinions on reasonable royalties for trademark infringement were unreliable, other opinions regarding patent infringement damages and trademark profit disgorgement were admissible.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-10-29
The court denied the government's motion to alter or amend the judgment, finding that the evidence supported the awarded damages and the expert testimony was reliable.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2024-09-30
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting BP's motion for summary judgment and excluding plaintiffs' general causation experts.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2024-09-30
The court held that the plaintiff's general causation expert's testimony was inadmissible because it lacked a reliable scientific foundation, failing to establish a causal link between PAH exposure and prostate cancer.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-08-13
The court held that the untimely expert disclosure was substantially justified and harmless, and that the expert's testimony was admissible in part, with specific opinions excluded due to unreliable methodology.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-12
The court held that a physician's observations of a patient's physical condition during an examination constitute lay testimony, not expert testimony subject to Daubert analysis, but testimony on specialized subjects like ergonomics requires qualification and reliable methodology
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-07-01
The court held that the defendants failed to establish grounds for excluding the plaintiff's expert testimony under Daubert and Federal Rule of Evidence 702, as their arguments regarding relevance, reliability, and fit were either conclusory, misplaced for a Daubert motion, or un
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-06-25
The court held that expert testimony must be based on reliable methodology and relevant to the facts, excluding opinions that are speculative, legal conclusions, or duplicative.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-06-03
The court held that the defendants failed to establish grounds for excluding the plaintiff's expert witness testimony under Daubert and Federal Rule of Evidence 702, as the expert's opinions were based on sufficient facts and data and were relevant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-04-23
The court held that the expert's opinions were admissible under the Daubert standard, as they were qualified, reliable, and assisted the trier of fact, with any perceived weaknesses to be addressed through cross-examination.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-04-16
The court held that expert testimony regarding the plaintiff's pre-accident intellectual functioning and whether the accident caused her to fail her nursing school exit exam was inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the Daubert standard.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-29
The court granted in part and denied in part the motion to exclude expert testimony, finding that damages related to former branch managers' loan volume and the Paramus branch closure were speculative and unsupported, but allowing the future lost profits claim to proceed if evide
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-05
The court held that a fair market value damages model is legally unavailable in this case because it improperly includes the value of departing employees who were free to leave and compete, and thus granted partial summary judgment against its use and precluded expert testimony o
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-02-28
The court held that expert testimony regarding damages precluded by the economic loss rule is inadmissible, but testimony regarding damages to 'other property' may be admissible.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-22
The court denied the motion to strike the expert's testimony, finding it admissible under Daubert and Rule 702.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-12-18
The court held that the defendant's motion to exclude the plaintiff's expert witness is denied because the expert is qualified, his methodology is reliable, and his opinions are helpful to the jury.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-17
Plaintiff Vanessa Treminio sued Crowley Maritime Corporation and Juan Emilio Blanco for sex trafficking and forced labor under federal law, as well as tort claims, alleging that Blanco transported her from El Salvador to Florida with intent to sexually assault her while employed
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-11-09
The court held that the defendant's Daubert challenge and motion to strike the expert's supplemental report were denied, finding the expert's methodology reliable and the supplemental report proper.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-02
The court granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion in limine, and granted the plaintiff's motion to exclude the defendants' expert witness.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-10-31
The court held that an expert's reports prepared for unrelated litigation, which did not specifically address the plaintiff's disability or the facts of the current case, were inadmissible under Daubert and Federal Rule of Evidence 26(a)(2).
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-09-22
The court held that the defendant's expert report was untimely and unreliable, failing to meet the Daubert standards for admissibility.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-08-16
The court held that the defendant's expert witness is qualified and his testimony is admissible under Daubert and Federal Rule of Evidence 702, as it is based on sufficient facts, reliable principles, and will assist the jury.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-17
The court denied the defendant's motion to exclude or limit the plaintiff's expert testimony.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-06-13
The court held that the defendants' motion to exclude the plaintiff's expert witness testimony should be granted because the expert's opinions were not based on reliable methodology, were contrary to controlling precedent, and offered legal conclusions.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-06-12
The court held that the plaintiff's expert's general causation testimony regarding ECT causing brain damage was inadmissible under Daubert and Rule 702 because it was not based on reliable scientific methodology.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-15
The court held that while the expert's methodology was reliable and generally helpful, specific opinions offering legal conclusions were inadmissible.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-03
A cruise ship passenger who fell down a stairwell sued Carnival Corporation for negligence, alleging that a raised rubber anti-skid strip on the stairs created a dangerous condition. The court denied the defendant's summary judgment motion, finding genuine disputes of material fa
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-05
Jane Doe sued Swift Transportation for sexual battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress after being allegedly assaulted by fellow driver Murray Willis while working as a truck driver trainee, and also brought claims for negligent hiring, negligent supervision, and
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-30
The court held that the defendant's expert may testify regarding the plaintiff's estimated blood alcohol concentration and its physiological effects, but may not offer opinions on whether the BAC caused or contributed to the plaintiff's fall.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2023-03-30
The court held that plaintiffs' general causation experts failed to meet the reliability and helpfulness standards under Daubert and Federal Rule of Evidence 702, warranting exclusion of their testimony and granting of summary judgment for the defendants.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2023-03-30
The court held that plaintiffs' general causation experts failed to meet the reliability and helpfulness standards under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert, warranting exclusion of their testimony and granting of summary judgment for the defendants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-23
Plaintiffs, as foreign representatives of Cayman Islands companies, sued Deutsche Bank for facilitating a Ponzi scheme through the opening and management of custody accounts that allowed fraudsters to misappropriate investor funds. The court granted in part and denied in part def
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-23
Go Mobile Flooring, LLC sued Blue Banyan Solutions, Inc. for breach of an information technology services contract, claiming it was overcharged and did not receive promised services, while Blue Banyan counterclaimed for non-payment. The court denied Blue Banyan's motion for parti
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2023-03-15
The court granted summary judgment in favor of NewWave on the claim that NewWave breached Section 4.7 of the Stock Purchase Agreement (SPA), finding that the SPA did not require NewWave to maintain funds for future contingent obligations. The court also granted summary judgment a
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-07
The court held that the expert testimony was admissible and that genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment for both defendants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-10-19
The court denied the defendant's motion to exclude the plaintiff's expert witness, finding the disclosure was not untimely or unreliable.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-10-18
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to exclude the defendant's expert testimony, finding the expert qualified and his methodology reliable.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-10-17
The court held that a human factors expert's testimony is admissible even if based on contested facts or a remote inspection, as weaknesses go to weight, not admissibility.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-23
The bankruptcy trustee for Universal Health Care Group sought to avoid and recover a $33.4 million stock redemption as a fraudulent transfer, alleging that private equity investor Warburg Pincus used a debt-financed redemption to exit its investment while concealing material info
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-08-18
The court granted motions to exclude expert witnesses because the deadlines for disclosure and discovery had expired, and the parties seeking to introduce the experts failed to demonstrate substantial justification or harmlessness for the delay.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-10
The court denied the defendant's motion to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Russell Lamb, finding his methodology sufficiently reliable under the Daubert standard.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-01
The court held that the expert opinions of Douglas Schulz and Arthur Olsen regarding class certification are inadmissible because they are not sufficiently reliable, and therefore excluded them.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-07-22
The court granted-in-part and denied-in-part Defendant Wal-Mart's motion in limine, ruling on the admissibility of various categories of evidence and testimony.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-07-21
The court held that an expert may not offer legal conclusions regarding notice or opine on matters outside their expertise, such as warning signs or housekeeping procedures.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-07-14
The court held that an expert's opinion on the technological comparability of patents from a prior license agreement is admissible if based on a reliable methodology, but vague and unsubstantiated opinions about the availability of numerous alternative designs are inadmissible.