-
821 F.2d 90·
2d Cir.·
1987-06-05
·cited 4×
The court held that the jury charge on reasonable doubt, while potentially confusing, was adequate when viewed as a whole, and that the admission of a prior consistent statement was proper to rebut charges of recent fabrication and for rehabilitation. Any error was harmless.
-
988 F.2d 1509·
7th Cir.·
1993-03-19
·cited 2×
The court held that a detective's testimony regarding his general distrust of defense attorneys was admissible for rehabilitation, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the mail fraud conviction but not the VIN alteration conviction for one defendant.
-
980 F.2d 1110·
7th Cir.·
1992-12-02
·cited 2×
The court held that the admission of Deputy Harmening's testimony regarding Richard Elmore's prior consistent statements was permissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) and that any other evidentiary errors were harmless. The court also affirmed the $5,000 fine, findi
-
792 So. 2d 1278·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2001-09-06
Delila Monday appeals her convictions for lewd and lascivious conduct, challenging the trial court's admission of the child victim's prior consistent statements (a diary entry and an affidavit) used to rehabilitate the victim after cross-examination impeached her on the date of t
-
765 So. 2d 925·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2000-08-25
Jamal Moore was convicted of resisting an officer without violence and knowingly driving while license suspended. The Second District Court of Appeal reversed his convictions due to a violated right to a public trial during jury selection and errors in restricting cross-examinati
-
375 F.2d 643·
6th Cir.·
1967-04-10
The court held that the district court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the Ohio turn signal statute, and also erred in excluding the investigating officer's explanation for a notation on his report.
-
193 So. 2d 709·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1967-01-17
The trial court did not err in admitting testimony regarding a state witness's sobriety, as the defense had raised the issue on cross-examination.