Receiver Pendente Lite

17 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Donovan v. Bierwirth
  680 F.2d 263· 2d Cir.· 1982-05-10 ·cited 80×
  The court held that while corporate officers serving as pension plan trustees must act solely in the plan participants' interests, they do not violate their duties by incidentally benefiting the corporation if they conduct a careful, impartial investigation. However, their action
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. United Fin. Grp., Inc.
  474 F.2d 354· 9th Cir.· 1973-01-17 ·cited 30×
  The court held that subject matter jurisdiction was proper and the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction and appointing a receiver.
• John G. Bookout for Modern Home Life Ins. Co. v. First Nat'l Mortg. & Disc. Co., Inc.
  514 F.2d 757· 5th Cir.· 1975-05-01 ·cited 19×
  The court held that the appointment of a receiver pendente lite was not an abuse of discretion and affirmed the lower court's order.
• The Fid. & Cas. Co. OF NEW York v. Marilyn O'Shea and the Honorable E. Randolph Bentley
  397 So. 2d 1196· Fla. 2d DCA· 1981-05-06 ·cited 16×
  The court reviewed whether a trial court could award attorney's fees to a defendant in an embezzlement case from a receivership estate administering assets of the embezzler and his household. The court held that the common fund doctrine did not support such an award because the d
• View Crest Garden Apts., Inc. v. United States
  281 F.2d 844· 9th Cir.· 1960-08-02 ·cited 16×
  A federal court can appoint a receiver to collect rents and profits under an FHA-insured mortgage, especially when security is inadequate or doubtful and the mortgagor is insolvent or of doubtful financial standing.
• Tanzer v. Huffines
  408 F.2d 42· 3d Cir.· 1969-03-18 ·cited 15×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in appointing a receiver pendente lite.
• In re Fed. Shopping WAY, Inc.
  433 F.2d 144· 9th Cir.· 1970-09-28 ·cited 8×
  The court held that petitioning creditors holding stock are not disqualified, the appointment of a receiver in SEC litigation satisfies statutory requirements for an involuntary reorganization petition, and the debtor was not denied due process.
• Montecatini Edison v. Ziegler
  486 F.2d 1279· D.C. Cir.· 1973-10-05 ·cited 6×
  Permissive counterclaims are cognizable in actions under 35 U.S.C. § 146, and a party commencing suit in the District of Columbia is considered 'found within the District' for jurisdictional purposes.
• Conlee Constr. Co. v. Sylvan B. Krause
  192 So. 2d 330· Fla. 3d DCA· 1966-12-06 ·cited 6×
  In this interlocutory appeal, the Florida District Court of Appeal reversed a lower court's order appointing a corporate receiver pendente lite for Conlee Construction Company, holding that the chancellor abused his discretion by appointing a receiver based solely on allegations
• Wingate v. Otto Mach and Mary Selina Mosgrove
  114 Fla. 380· Fla.· 1934-04-02 ·cited 5×
  The Supreme Court denied an application for a constitutional writ, sought to preserve estate property pending an appeal. The writ was requested because the lower court denied a motion to appoint a receiver and injunction to manage a decedent's business during a will validity disp
• In re W. Cntys. Const. Co. McCarthy v. W. Cntys. Const. Co.
  182 F.2d 409· 7th Cir.· 1950-06-05 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in fixing the attorney's fees, considering the practicalities of the reorganization plan.
• First La. Inv. Corp. v. United States
  351 F.2d 495· 5th Cir.· 1965-10-11 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the district court did not err in granting a preliminary injunction and appointing a receiver.
• Jones v. Pfaff
  77 So. 3d 884· Fla. 2d DCA· 2012-01-20
  Cynthia Jones appealed an order declining to exercise jurisdiction over the judicial dissolution of a corporation in which she and Louis Pfaff were equal shareholders. The Florida District Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order was not app
• The Tourist Channel, Inc. v. Namey
  568 So. 2d 543· Fla. 5th DCA· 1990-10-25
• State v. Neckman
  320 So. 2d 21· Fla. 3d DCA· 1975-09-23
  The Florida Supreme Court declined to accept a certified question from a trial court regarding whether a receiver appointed in a mortgage foreclosure action is a necessary party to a separate declaratory judgment action seeking to invalidate leases on the foreclosed property. The
• Tanzer v. Huffines
  412 F.2d 221· 3d Cir.· 1969-06-10
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in authorizing the sale of stock by a receiver pendente lite, despite deviations from statutory procedures.
• Lily M. Davis and R. F. Davis v. Leonard
  66 Fla. 351· Fla.· 1913-11-11
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the appointment of a receiver over jointly-owned newspaper property where one co-tenant (a married woman) was excluding the other co-tenant from use and enjoyment of the property and diverting its income. The court held that equity jurisdiction