Railroad Revitalization And Regulatory Reform Act Of 1976

69 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Nat'l Ass'n OF Recycling Indus., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States
  627 F.2d 1341· D.C. Cir.· 1980-04-25 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the petitions challenging ICC general revenue proceedings were moot because a related decision in NARI II provided an equally or more effective remedy for the issues raised.
• Union Carbide Corp. v. State Bd. OF TAX Comm'rs OF the State OF Ind.
  992 F.2d 119· 7th Cir.· 1993-04-27
  A federal court complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 306 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 is governed by the doctrine of laches, not state statutes of limitations, because the relief sought is purely equitable.
• Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & the United States
  985 F.2d 589· D.C. Cir.· 1993-02-09
  The court held that the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) failed to adequately justify its decision to abandon the Constrained Market Pricing (CMP) methodology in favor of the Revenue Over Variable Cost (R/VC) method for determining reasonable railroad rates.
• Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. City OF Superior
  962 F.2d 619· 7th Cir.· 1992-05-01
  The court held that the city's mischaracterization of its prior arguments constituted sanctionable misconduct, and the appeal was frivolous.
• The Soc'y OF Plastics Indus., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & the United States
  955 F.2d 722· D.C. Cir.· 1992-02-07
  A Multiple Independent Factor Through Rate (MIFTR) is a permissible form of joint rate under the Interstate Commerce Act, allowing for unilateral adjustments by participating carriers.
• Consol. Rail Corp. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n
  855 F.2d 78· 3d Cir.· 1988-08-15
  The court affirmed the ICC's order, holding that its revised standards for railroad revenue adequacy were permissible interpretations of the relevant statutes and not arbitrary or capricious.
• Drayton v. United States
  801 F.2d 117· 3d Cir.· 1986-09-11
  The court held that the 8% interest component of the Certificates of Value is taxable as ordinary income, not eligible for non-recognition under § 374(c) or § 337.
• The Am. Short Line R.R. Ass'n v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n
  751 F.2d 107· 2d Cir.· 1984-12-18
  The court held that the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) did not err in interpreting the feasibility standard for the Staggers Act's direct connector requirement and properly exercised its discretion in denying the railroads' request for a delay in implementation.
• W. Coal Traffic League & its Members v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n
  719 F.2d 772· 5th Cir.· 1983-11-14
  The Interstate Commerce Commission cannot reinterpret the 4-R Act's market dominance definition to include geographic or product competition when the statute clearly limits it to competition from other carriers or modes of transportation for the specific traffic or movement.
• Water Transp. Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States
  684 F.2d 81· D.C. Cir.· 1982-07-27
  The court held that the Interstate Commerce Commission's rulemaking proceeding substantially complied with the Administrative Procedure Act's notice requirements and that the final rules adequately considered Section 707 of the Staggers Act.
• Se. Pa. Transp. Auth. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n
  682 F.2d 91· 3d Cir.· 1982-06-28
  The court held that the Rail Service Planning Office's order assigning commuter rail accident costs to SEPTA was not arbitrary or capricious and was consistent with the statute.
• Chicago & N. W. Transp. Co. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n
  582 F.2d 1043· 7th Cir.· 1978-05-30
  The court should deny the petition for review regarding the definition of 'current cost' because the Commission's original cost standard for depreciation is legally sound and economically logical.