-
203 F.2d 934·
1st Cir.·
1953-04-27
The court held that the district court's findings of fact were not clearly erroneous, and thus the Commonwealth did not deny the appellant procedural due process by denying him a reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel of his choice.
-
195 F.2d 198·
D.C. Cir.·
1952-02-21
The court held that the petitioner had adequate notice of the respondent's claims regarding disputed costs, thus satisfying due process requirements.
-
163 F.2d 993·
Emer. Ct. App.·
1947-11-06
The court held that the rent order was invalid to the extent it purported to fix maximum rent retroactively.
-
S.D. Fla.·
1931-08-27
Citrus growers challenged a Florida statute prohibiting arsenic use on bearing citrus trees as violating the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. The court held that the statute satisfied due process requirements because it provided adequate notice and opportunity for heari
-
19th Cir. Ct. App. Div.·
A quasi-judicial administrative board's decision to order abandonment of an unpermitted sewage system and cessation of commercial use until approved systems are installed is supported by competent, substantial evidence and does not violate procedural due process or the essential