3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-03-19
The court granted a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the breach of contract claim due to the violation of an enforceable non-compete agreement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-03-19
The court denied the motion for injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-03-18
The court granted in part and denied in part the motion, issuing a temporary restraining order against defendants for trademark infringement and unfair competition.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-03-17
The court held that the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for breach of contract regarding the return of information and providing services to former clients, but not for trade secret violations.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-03-17
The court held that the first and fourth affirmative defenses were insufficient as a matter of law and granted Publix's motion to strike them, while denying the motion to strike the seventh affirmative defense.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-03-04
The court held that a request for an injunction to stay a state foreclosure sale was denied because the plaintiff failed to meet procedural requirements and demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, and because the Anti-Injunction Act barred such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-03-02
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction as moot because the plaintiff had been transferred to a different facility.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-02-28
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the dispute likely arose in connection with the business activities of the associated person and that the definition of 'customer' under FINRA rules is broad.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-02-24
The court denied plaintiffs' motions for a deposition to perpetuate testimony and for an injunction pending appeal, and granted sanctions in part against plaintiffs' counsel.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-02-20
A party cannot obtain a traditional injunction without asserting an independent cause of action.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-02-14
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction because the evidence was in equipoise and the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm without an adequate remedy at law.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-02-14
The court granted an ex-parte temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm due to the threatened dissipation of PACA trust assets.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-02-13
The court denied Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because Plaintiff failed to meet the stringent requirements for ex parte relief and lacked proper notice to the adverse party.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-02-11
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2020-01-31
The appellate court reversed a Department of Health order that approved a hospital's application to become a Level II trauma center. The court found that the Department erred by applying an outdated statute, as intervening amendments to the law required the application to be deni
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-01-27
The court held that disputed issues of material fact prevent summary judgment on patent validity, infringement, and inequitable conduct, and denied a motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-01-15
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief was denied and the case was dismissed without prejudice because he failed to comply with local rules and did not file a proper complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-01-09
The court held that while the preliminary injunction against using the term 'Primo' remains, the prohibition against using the Chinese term 'pu rui mo' in China must be dissolved due to comity and sovereignty concerns related to ongoing Chinese litigation recognizing another enti
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-01-09
The court held that the complaint must be dismissed without prejudice because it constitutes an improper shotgun pleading.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-12-23
The court granted the United States' Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction, enjoining defendants from violating Internal Revenue employment tax reporting and payment requirements.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-12-04
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary injunction because it failed to comply with procedural rules and lacked federal subject matter jurisdiction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-12-03
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order due to procedural deficiencies and failure to meet the standard for ex parte relief, deferring ruling on the preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-12-03
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because it was procedurally insufficient and lacked a showing of irreparable harm. The court deferred ruling on the preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-11-26
The court held that the arbitration provision in the enrollment agreement was not unconscionable and granted the motion to compel arbitration.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-11-23
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for his First and Fourteenth Amendment claims, thus denying his motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-11-21
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the prerequisites for injunctive relief and denied the motion.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-11-13
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet its burden of persuasion for a preliminary injunction because it did not provide sufficient evidence that the restrictive covenants were reasonably necessary to protect its legitimate business interests.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-11-05
The court held that ActivEngage failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury, thus denying its motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the state-law claims, thus dismissing the amended complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-10-22
The court held that a motion for injunctive relief must seek relief related to claims in the operative complaint and must comply with local rules regarding supporting evidence.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2019-10-18
Florida voters amended the state constitution in 2018 to automatically restore voting rights to most felons "upon completion of all terms of sentence including parole or probation," but the Florida Legislature enacted a statute implementing this amendment to require payment of fi
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-10-16
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding trade dress distinctiveness, non-functionality, and likelihood of confusion.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-10-08
The court held that while 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) mandates detention, prolonged detention without a bond hearing can violate the Due Process Clause.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-10-07
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendants from manufacturing, selling, or distributing counterfeit goods bearing Plaintiff's trademarks and from transferring assets.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-30
The court denied NCH's motion for a preliminary injunction because it sought relief beyond the scope of preliminary injunctions and failed to demonstrate actual and imminent irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-26
The court held that the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing because they failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of future injury and failed to show redressability.
-
A trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying a temporary injunction when the moving party fails to establish a clear legal right to relief and irreparable harm, and when adequate remedies at law exist for quantifiable damages such as lost rental income.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-09-25
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden to prove that the SNAP violations did not occur or that the sanction imposed was arbitrary and capricious, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-09-24
The court granted the plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-12
The court denied the plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction as moot.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-11
The court denied the motion for preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, as the contracts did not unambiguously assign the defendants' rights of publicity.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-09-06
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for reconsideration because it amounted to a disagreement with the court's prior reasoning and rehashed arguments already considered.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-08-28
The court held that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the petitioner's claims challenging the execution of her final removal order.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-08-22
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining the defendants from distributing copyrighted works and using infringing trademarks.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2019-08-21
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding its Contracts Clause claim, as the statute, while impairing contracts, served a significant and legitimate public purpose.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-08-16
Plaintiff's motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order is denied because she has not established a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of her claims.
-
Del. Ch.·
2019-08-13
The Court of Chancery lacks jurisdiction to enjoin future defamatory speech, as such claims are traditionally reserved for courts of law. While a "trade libel" exception exists where defamation is incidental to a separate business tort, the plaintiff's claim here focuses primaril
-
The Court granted a mandatory preliminary injunction, enjoining the defendants from applying Section 7(e)(ii) of the bylaws to invalidate the plaintiff's nominations based on the late return of questionnaires. The Court ordered that votes for the plaintiff's nominees shall be cou
-
N.D. Fla.·
2019-05-10
The court granted in part plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, ordering specific measures to ensure compliance with Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act until state rulemaking is complete.
-
The trial court's order denying the emergency motion to compel compliance and for contempt is a non-final, non-appealable order subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, while the trial court's order imposing a temporary injunction freezing assets is affirmed without prejudi