3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
282 F.2d 377·
3d Cir.·
1960-09-28
·cited 2×
The court held that the district court lacked jurisdiction to issue injunctive relief due to the applicability of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, as established by a Supreme Court precedent. The appeal was limited to controlling questions of law due to the procedural posture.
-
281 F.2d 773·
7th Cir.·
1960-08-10
·cited 2×
A single circuit judge should not issue an injunction that would effectively decide the merits of an appeal, especially when the trial court has already denied a similar injunction.
-
280 F.2d 343·
3d Cir.·
1960-06-30
·cited 2×
The court held that the district court's preliminary injunction order was not improper and the application to vacate it was premature.
-
16 Fla. Supp. 145·
Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1960-06-27
·cited 2×
Dade County sought a declaratory judgment and injunction to enforce its countywide traffic ordinance and metropolitan court against two municipalities that refused to recognize these ordinances. The court held that the Dade County home rule amendment expressly authorized the coun
-
276 F.2d 275·
3d Cir.·
1960-03-09
·cited 2×
-
The dissenting judge holds that the court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of the case because the appeal was from a temporary injunction, not a final judgment.
-
271 F.2d 820·
5th Cir.·
1959-11-16
·cited 2×
The court held that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction based on weak evidence of a prevailing price and irreparable harm, and that the injunction overlooked the public's interest in legal price cuts.
-
The Court of Appeals' prior ruling that the cause was moot applied only to the temporary injunction, not the merits of the action.
-
264 F.2d 711·
2d Cir.·
1959-03-23
·cited 2×
The court held that it would not grant a preliminary injunction to reinstate a sublicense that was cancelled due to unsatisfactory service, even if a hearing was required before such a determination.
-
The court held that mandamus is not appropriate to compel a district court to hear a motion for a preliminary injunction before a motion to dismiss, as there was no abuse of discretion.
-
The Leon County Circuit Court upheld the Florida Milk Commission's authority to fix prices for surplus milk (classes II and III) and require distributors to accept and pay minimum prices for all milk delivered by producers, provided the Commission exercises this power reasonably.
-
257 F.2d 580·
5th Cir.·
1958-06-23
·cited 2×
The court held that the appeal from the order granting temporary relief is moot because the relevant tobacco selling season has concluded.
-
250 F.2d 951·
2d Cir.·
1958-01-02
·cited 2×
The court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment and should have instead granted a preliminary injunction pending a trial on the merits regarding the validity of the lien and subsequent sale.
-
246 F.2d 675·
D.C. Cir.·
1957-05-16
·cited 2×
The court affirmed the denial of the preliminary injunction, finding it a proper exercise of discretion, and dismissed the appeal from the denial of summary judgment.
-
215 F.2d 485·
D.C. Cir.·
1954-05-04
·cited 2×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction, as the appellant failed to show a clear error or irreparable harm that would justify bypassing administrative remedies.
-
Hall v. Hanford concerns whether an amended complaint alleging property boundary encroachments sufficiently states a cause of action for injunctive relief, and whether a bond from the first injunction proceeding can secure a second injunction. The Florida Supreme Court held that
-
The court held that a bankruptcy court should not enjoin foreclosure proceedings instituted prior to bankruptcy when the security interest was acquired more than four months before filing, absent proof of irreparable injury.
-
The court held that the appeal was untimely filed and should be dismissed.
-
178 F.2d 655·
2d Cir.·
1949-12-16
·cited 2×
The court held that the order for a preliminary injunction was improper and reversed it, while affirming the denial of a motion to restrain threats related to a different product.
-
168 F.2d 841·
5th Cir.·
1948-06-30
·cited 2×
The court held that the federal district court erred in granting a preliminary injunction because it lacked jurisdiction in rem over the seized property, which was in the custody of a state court, and because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which equitable relief could
-
159 F.2d 18·
D.C. Cir.·
1946-12-16
·cited 2×
The court held that the government, as operator of the mines, was authorized to recognize the union as the exclusive representative of supervisors, and this action was valid.
-
159 F.2d 88·
3d Cir.·
1946-08-12
·cited 2×
The court held that the concealment of material facts regarding a new patent application during the pendency of a preliminary injunction motion constituted civil contempt.
-
118 Fla. 895·
Fla.·
1935-03-26
·cited 2×
The Supreme Court of Florida reviewed an order denying a preliminary injunction. The appellees confessed error, agreeing the lower court erred. The court reversed the denial of the injunction and vacated a previously issued constitutional writ.
-
Del. Ch.·
2026-01-02
·cited 1×
BankUnited sought a preliminary injunction against former employees and a competitor from soliciting employees and customers, alleging breach of non-solicitation covenants in a Code of Conduct and Restricted Stock Unit/Award agreements. The trial court denied the preliminary inju
-
2022 WL 198811·
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-22
·cited 1×
The court denied the petitioner's emergency request for a temporary restraining order because he failed to meet any of the four required elements.
-
A trial court errs in granting a preliminary injunction without including factual findings in support thereof and without addressing the bond requirement, conducting an evidentiary hearing thereon, or explaining reasons for waiving the bond.
-
The court held that a plaintiff seeking to enjoin state foreclosure proceedings must demonstrate that the injunction falls within one of the three narrow exceptions to the Anti-Injunction Act, which the plaintiff failed to do.
-
2022 WL 3290677·
S.D. Fla.·
2025-03-27
·cited 1×
The court denied Defendant William Holton's motion to dissolve the Temporary Restraining Order, granted in part and denied in part other defendants' motions to modify the TRO, and modified the TRO to allow for certain fund releases and account unfreezes.
-
2020 WL 3847839·
N.D. Fla.·
2024-09-17
·cited 1×
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because it was not based on the claims in his complaint and sought relief beyond the scope of the complaint, and denied the motion to appoint counsel as no exceptional circumstances were shown.
-
Three property owners subject to compliance agreements demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on equitable estoppel claims where the City's delay in issuing building permits rendered compliance functionally impossible, warranting a temporary injunction against demolitio
-
352 So. 3d 946·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2022-12-22
·cited 1×
A preliminary injunction enforcing a non-compete agreement is not sustainable where the evidence establishes only ordinary on-the-job training in industry-standard practices, as such training does not constitute extraordinary or specialized training sufficient to support a legiti
-
The appellate court reversed a trial court's order granting a temporary injunction. The court found that the injunction improperly altered the status quo and granted the ultimate relief sought by the plaintiffs before a full trial on the merits.
-
The appellate court reviewed a trial court's denial of a motion to vacate an automatic stay of a temporary injunction. The court held that the appellees (abortion clinics and a doctor) lacked standing to seek a temporary injunction because they could not demonstrate irreparable h
-
A temporary injunction that grants affirmative relief by requiring implementation of an entirely new, unenacted redistricting plan is unlawful on its face because it exceeds the limited purpose of preserving the status quo pending final adjudication. The trial court abused its di
-
The all writs doctrine does not authorize the Florida Supreme Court to intervene in an ongoing appellate proceeding when the Court does not currently have jurisdiction and it is speculative whether jurisdiction will exist in the future.
-
339 So. 3d 1086·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-06-01
·cited 1×
God's Blessing Ltd. and other shipowners appealed a trial court order requiring reinstatement of maintenance and cure payments to crew member Kathy Salas. The appellate court reversed the order, holding that interim maintenance and cure awards in Florida state courts must comply
-
An RFP is not a binding contract but an invitation to negotiate; selection of a winning proposer does not transform the RFP into an enforceable contract when the parties have not executed a final agreement containing all essential terms. Without a valid contract, a proposer has n
-
The appellate court affirmed a trial court's order granting a temporary injunction against the collection of school impact fees. The court found that the appellees demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and a likelihood of irreparable harm, which are neces
-
This case involves an appeal by Family Heritage Life Insurance Company and two former employees of Combined Insurance Company against a temporary injunction. The appellate court affirmed the injunction, finding that the trial court properly applied the legal standards for issuing
-
The trial court was required to conduct an evidentiary hearing before granting a temporary injunction, even after striking the appellants' pleadings.
-
Appellants challenged Palm Beach County's mask mandate (EO-12) as unconstitutional, arguing it violated their right to privacy and the right to refuse medical treatment. The trial court denied their motion for a temporary injunction, applying rational basis review. The appellate
-
306 So. 3d 185·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-06-03
·cited 1×
This case involves two consolidated appeals concerning property development and maintenance within a condominium community. The court addressed disputes over maintenance assessments and the extent to which a property owner could develop its land under various agreements. Ultimate
-
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding $500 per month in temporary alimony where both the requesting spouse's need and the paying spouse's ability to pay were supported by competent substantial evidence. The injunctive order directing deposit of funds into an at
-
The appellate court reversed a trial court's order compelling an insurance company to repair a property, finding that the order, treated as a temporary injunction, was improperly granted without following required legal formalities.
-
A trial court lacks jurisdiction to modify or reimpose an injunction bond order while a stay pending appellate review is in effect.
-
In a dissolution of marriage case, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reviewed four interlocutory orders entered on the same day, including a temporary injunction, temporary relief order, and denials of the husband's motions regarding lis pendens notice and temporary support. Th
-
The Florida House of Representatives has a cognizable interest in intervening as a defendant in a declaratory action challenging the constitutionality of medical marijuana legislation because the action will determine the scope of the legislature's constitutional authority to ena
-
320 So. 3d 195·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2019-08-27
·cited 1×
A statute requiring MMTCs to be vertically integrated and perform all supply-chain activities directly conflicts with the constitutional definition permitting entities to engage in one or more of those activities, rendering the statute unconstitutional as a restriction on a const
-
A temporary injunction compelling readmission to a private school must be supported by clear, definite, and unequivocally sufficient factual findings addressing all four elements of the test: substantial likelihood of success on the merits, lack of adequate remedy at law, irrepar
-
A temporary injunction without notice must strictly comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610, including endorsement of the date and hour of entry and imposition of a bond, or it is defective and must be remanded for correction.