3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court found that TCG established a substantial likelihood of success on its CFAA claim, warranting a preliminary injunction.
-
A physician appeals a temporary injunction enforcing a non-compete provision in his employment agreement with his former employer. The trial court granted the injunction, finding sufficient evidence of the doctor's breach of the restrictive covenant, and the appellate court affir
-
576 F. Supp. 2d 1281·
N.D. Fla.·
2008-07-28
·cited 2×
The court held that the statute compelling businesses to allow workers with concealed-carry permits to store guns in their vehicles in parking lots is constitutional, but the provision compelling businesses to allow customers to store guns in vehicles is unconstitutional due to a
-
Fortune Development Sales Corporation obtained a judgment against Wavestone Properties for breach of an exclusive real estate listing agreement and sought to enforce it through proceedings supplementary. The trial court granted a temporary injunction freezing condominium sale pro
-
490 F.3d 820·
11th Cir.·
2007-06-26
·cited 2×
The Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court's preliminary injunction against the Tampa Sports Authority's pat-down search policy at Raymond James Stadium, holding that a season ticket holder voluntarily consented to the searches through his knowledge of the policy, multiple op
-
The court held that the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits of its trademark infringement claim, justifying a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the final domestic violence injunction must be reversed because the respondent did not receive reasonable notice of the final hearing.
-
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's decision permitting a former wife to relocate with minor children from Broward County to Brevard County, holding that the trial court failed to properly consider the six statutory factors required under Florida
-
The Fourth District affirmed the trial court's denial of a temporary injunction to enforce a non-compete covenant because the appellant failed to establish an adequate remedy at law, an essential prerequisite for injunctive relief.
-
Shands at Lake Shore, Inc. appealed a trial court's grant of an emergency temporary injunction in favor of Dr. Frank Ferrero, who sought to enjoin the hospital from interfering with his medical staff privileges. The appellate court reversed, holding that Dr. Ferrero failed to dem
-
A local government can continue to impose a franchise fee on an electric utility during a holdover period after the franchise agreement expires, while parties negotiate a new arrangement or buyout.
-
Sherri Lynn Schmitz appeals a temporary injunction for domestic violence protection and custody order, arguing she was denied due process when the trial court allowed the psychologist to testify based on a 35-page custody evaluation report delivered to her attorney only one day b
-
356 F. Supp. 2d 1289·
S.D. Fla.·
2005-01-11
·cited 2×
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood that defendants violated the FDCA and federal fraud statutes through deceptive practices in marketing an unapproved drug.
-
The trial court erred in applying a "special damages" standard to determine irreparable injury for a temporary injunction, as this standard is relevant to standing, not the irreparable harm element.
-
Jacksonville Coalition for Voter Protection and affiliated organizations sought a preliminary injunction to compel Duval County to open additional early voting sites, arguing that African-American voters faced disproportionate barriers to voting in violation of Section 2 of the V
-
The City of Cocoa Beach appeals a contempt order imposing sanctions for violating an injunction that stayed enforcement of voter-approved referendum amendments restricting building height and density. The appellate court reversed, holding that the injunction only prohibited enfor
-
The court granted the Special Master's motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum, finding that compliance would impose an undue burden and violate protective orders from a state court.
-
304 F. Supp. 2d 1353·
M.D. Fla.·
2004-02-03
·cited 2×
The court held that the federal government's power to enforce the Internal Revenue Code is an enumerated power, not a residual power, and therefore does not require a "notice of acceptance" of jurisdiction over land.
-
863 So. 2d 1269·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2004-01-23
·cited 2×
P.M. Realty appeals a permanent injunction against its adult use business in Ybor City, which the trial court granted based on the 'law of the case' doctrine from a prior preliminary injunction ruling. The court reverses, holding that a preliminary injunction does not establish b
-
Skyway Trap & Skeet Club appeals a trial court order that converted a temporary injunction into a permanent injunction prohibiting it from depositing expended shot on adjacent water management district property. The court reversed, holding that the permanent injunction was improp
-
The court held that the city's policy of excluding all political organizations from participating in its annual parade is a reasonable restriction on speech within a limited public forum, as it is viewpoint neutral and serves the parade's purpose of maintaining a family-oriented,
-
Clara Cortina appealed a trial court's order granting a temporary injunction enforcing a noncompete agreement against her. The appellate court reversed because The Staffing Source failed to provide Cortina with reasonable notice of the temporary injunction hearing, as required by
-
M & E Distributors and Mark Martone appealed a temporary injunction prohibiting them from using the name 'Worley's Wonder' to market their own cleaning product. The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the injunction, finding sufficient evidence of trademark infringement and
-
-
254 F. Supp. 2d 1297·
S.D. Fla.·
2003-02-27
·cited 2×
The court held that a nude art installation intended as a peace symbol constitutes expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment, and a total ban on nudity is not a narrowly tailored restriction.
-
E.S. Thomas & Associates appeals the denial of its motion for a temporary injunction to prevent an independent insurance agent from soliciting its customers and agents in violation of nonsolicitation and noncompetition covenants. The court affirms the trial court's denial, findin
-
The Florida Department of Agriculture appeals a trial court order granting a temporary injunction that held unconstitutional the 2002 amendments to citrus canker eradication statutes. The appellate court certifies the case to the Florida Supreme Court as involving issues of great
-
Florida appellate court reversed a temporary injunction restraining removal of children from jurisdiction because the trial court's order and the husband's motion failed to comply with procedural requirements under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610, including lack of verifica
-
191 F. Supp. 2d 1356·
S.D. Fla.·
2002-02-15
·cited 2×
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of imminent harm or that the court had authority to enjoin the actions of the named defendants.
-
A real estate broker who represented clients in negotiating the purchase of condominium units on Fisher Island subsequently purchased those same units herself after the clients declined to proceed. The clients sued to impose a constructive trust, seeking a temporary injunction to
-
The court held that the plaintiffs' claims were not ripe for review and that they failed to establish irreparable harm, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
186 F. Supp. 2d 1203·
M.D. Fla.·
2001-08-24
·cited 2×
The court held that the statute does not prohibit preliminary injunctive relief for permanent disqualification from the Food Stamp Program, even for trafficking violations, and that the plaintiff met the prerequisites for such relief.
-
The court held that the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm, justifying a preliminary injunction against the defendant's use of the Bulova mark.
-
Yachting Promotions appealed a trial court's grant of a mandatory temporary injunction in favor of Broward Yachts. The appellate court reversed, holding that the Dade county circuit court had prior jurisdiction over the same parties and subject matter, and therefore the Broward c
-
-
Physicians Perez and Vazquez appealed two temporary injunctions issued under their non-compete agreements with Humana Medical Plan. The court affirmed the first injunction restricting work within a five-mile radius of Humana's clinic but reversed the second injunction that extend
-
767 So. 2d 466·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1999-10-13
·cited 2×
Uro-Care and Uro-Medix sought a preliminary injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement against their former employee, Dr. Montford. The trial court denied the injunction based on 'patient preference,' but the appellate court reversed, finding this rationale did not constitute
-
Image Data appealed an ex parte temporary injunction that prohibited it and the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles from disseminating driver license information. The Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed the injunction, finding it violated multiple procedur
-
An accounting firm sold its business to Chitty & Company in a transaction that included non-compete agreements, independent contractor agreements, leases, and promissory notes executed simultaneously. When Chitty failed to pay for services under the independent contractor agreeme
-
78 F. Supp. 2d 1327·
S.D. Fla.·
1999-08-27
·cited 2×
The court held that Metropolitan Dade County Ordinance 96-13 is not substantially overbroad and is a constitutional content-neutral time, place, and manner regulation, denying plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on these grounds.
-
The court held that the Traffic Management Plan's provisions for bridge closures and pass issuance violated the First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, and the Dormant Commerce Clause.
-
The appellate court considered whether a contract provision waiving the bond requirement for a temporary injunction is enforceable, holding that such a waiver is generally not permissible under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b).
-
Seminole County sought to enjoin Sassy Merlot's, an adult entertainment establishment, from operating without the required license. The trial court granted Sassy's counterclaim for a temporary injunction and ruled that Sassy did not need a license, but the appellate court reverse
-
The court affirmed the trial court's injunction but noted reversible error in failing to require a bond for the temporary injunction, which was subsequently remedied.
-
33 F. Supp. 2d 1037·
S.D. Fla.·
1998-08-27
·cited 2×
The court held that a preliminary injunction is warranted even if the defendant has ceased infringing conduct, especially when the infringement was willful and occurred over a long period.
-
This case involves amendments to Florida's Family Law Rules of Procedure and Forms, specifically updating domestic violence injunction forms and support-related forms to comply with legislative changes effective July 1, 1998. The Florida Supreme Court approved the amendments, whi
-
-
972 F. Supp. 608·
S.D. Fla.·
1997-05-22
·cited 2×
The court held that it has jurisdiction to hear the case, granted provisional class certification, and issued a temporary restraining order, denying the defendants' motion to dismiss.
-
Dade County appeals a temporary injunction order that prevented property owners from removing asphalt from a public road but failed to require restoration of damaged pavement. The court held that the trial judge abused her discretion by not immediately ordering the defendants to
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate imminent irreparable injury, a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, or that the threatened injury outweighed potential harm to the defendants and the public inte