3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
This case involves multiple petitioners seeking temporary injunctions against a hotel employees union's picketing. The lower court denied the injunctions, finding the picketing methods were not sufficient grounds for relief, but deferred ruling on the lawfulness of the picketing'
-
222 F.2d 850·
1st Cir.·
1955-05-19
·cited 4×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to dismiss and issuing a preliminary injunction, finding sufficient evidence of jurisdictional amount and upholding the validity of the state's Fair Trade Law.
-
214 F.2d 242·
D.C. Cir.·
1954-05-07
·cited 4×
The court granted an injunction pending appeal, enjoining the company from paying a dividend and redeeming bonds, pending further investigation and report.
-
The Florida Supreme Court held that a trial court erred in dismissing a complaint challenging a city ordinance while simultaneously keeping a temporary injunction in full force and effect. The court found that once a complaint is dismissed, any temporary injunction based on that
-
199 F.2d 75·
4th Cir.·
1952-09-29
·cited 4×
A party cannot seek judicial intervention to maintain the status quo while an administrative appeal is pending; administrative remedies must be fully exhausted before court intervention is permissible.
-
190 F.2d 860·
7th Cir.·
1951-08-08
·cited 4×
The court held that the district court lacked primary jurisdiction over the plaintiffs' claims regarding removal from the Open Order List, and thus properly denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
183 F.2d 520·
3d Cir.·
1950-07-24
·cited 4×
The court held that the bankruptcy court retained jurisdiction to investigate allegations that the successor corporation's proposed by-law changes aimed to circumvent the reorganization plan.
-
The court held that a petition for rehearing and a motion to intervene should be denied because the court should not prejudge the res judicata issues pending before administrative bodies.
-
182 F.2d 779·
2d Cir.·
1950-06-02
·cited 4×
The court held that the supplemental complaint was properly dismissed for failure to allege special damages, as required for trade libel claims.
-
The court held that the Housing Expediter had the authority to inspect defendants' housing accommodations and that the lower court erred in denying an injunction pendente lite.
-
164 F.2d 922·
3d Cir.·
1947-10-30
·cited 4×
The court affirmed the denial of the motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction, finding that the state board's contention of concurrent jurisdiction was resolved by a subsequent state supreme court ruling.
-
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed an interlocutory decree that temporarily enjoined the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company from constructing a railway on certain city streets. The court denied review of a cross-appeal regarding adverse possession by another company, deferring
-
143 F.2d 579·
7th Cir.·
1944-06-28
·cited 4×
The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, finding the question of mootness was not determinable from the record.
-
119 F.2d 929·
7th Cir.·
1941-04-18
·cited 4×
A patentee who has obtained a decree for an accounting of profits and damages, with a supersedeas bond assuring payment, cannot enjoin a customer who is merely a user of the infringing device, as the bond provides assurance of compensation equivalent to actual payment.
-
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision to deny a motion to dismiss and grant a temporary injunction against a Miami Beach ordinance that prohibited the bulk storage of gasoline. The court found the bill had equity and deferred further discussion until after a
-
The appellate court dismissed an appeal from an order dissolving a temporary injunction because the injunction would have expired before the appeal could be heard, rendering the appeal moot. The court emphasized that appeals should not be pursued when no practical relief can be g
-
This case involves a dispute over a timber sale contract. The appellate court reversed a lower court's decision to grant a temporary injunction, finding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate irreparable harm or lack of an adequate remedy at law.
-
This case involves a dispute over "white settlement" signs and intimidation tactics used by property owners against potential Black purchasers. The appellate court reversed the lower court's injunction, finding the decree against the weight of the evidence.
-
This case involves an appeal from two interlocutory orders granting temporary injunctions without proper notice or sufficient factual basis in the bills filed. The appellate court found the bills insufficient to support the injunctions.
-
The Florida Supreme Court reversed interlocutory orders granting a temporary injunction and denying dissolution of that injunction in a case arising from a prior ejectment judgment. The court held that Peeples lacked independent equity for his bill seeking to stay execution of an
-
The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a temporary injunction order issued by the trial court, finding that the written order was facially insufficient under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c) and that the trial court set the injunction bond without allowing the parti
-
The Court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits, given the potential applicability of California law which may render key contract provisions unlawful.
-
103 F.4th 765·
11th Cir.·
2024-06-03
·cited 3×
American Alliance for Equal Rights challenged the Fearless Fund's grant contest, which limited applicant eligibility to Black women, arguing the racial exclusion violated 42 U.S.C. § 1981's prohibition on race discrimination in contracting. The Eleventh Circuit held that the Alli
-
A temporary injunction must be supported by express factual findings addressing all four required elements, and an injunction that merely recites legal conclusions is insufficient.
-
George Leposky appealed a nonfinal order freezing his bank accounts issued by a guardianship court in response to an unverified motion filed by his wife's court-appointed guardian. The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the asset freeze order because the guardian's motion l
-
A temporary injunction must be affirmed only to the extent that each of the four required elements—irreparable harm, inadequacy of legal remedy, substantial likelihood of success on the merits, and public interest—is supported by specific factual findings; portions lacking these
-
The appellate court reversed a trial court's order granting a temporary injunction. The court found that the party seeking the injunction failed to present sufficient competent, substantial evidence to meet the required legal elements for such relief, particularly regarding irrep
-
2012 WL 1900559·
M.D. Fla.·
2022-07-03
·cited 3×
The court held that a motion for injunctive relief must be denied when there is no operative complaint and the requested relief does not relate to the complaint.
-
A temporary injunction enforcing a foreign embargo order may be issued and maintained in an in rem proceeding without personal jurisdiction over the defendant, provided the defendant received due process in the foreign tribunal, the foreign court had original jurisdiction, and th
-
JM Field Marketing sued Mapei Corporation and Southeastern Printing Company for misappropriating its proprietary All In View (AIV) software system in violation of trade secret law and a confidentiality agreement. The circuit court granted a temporary injunction preventing further
-
A temporary injunction was improperly granted where the licensee possessed only a revocable license to use parking spaces, was unlikely to succeed on the merits, and the injunction would alter rather than preserve the status quo by requiring restoration to a pre-construction cond
-
ERHM Orthopedics appeals a trial court's order denying attorney's fees following a dispute with former employee Todd Edwards over a non-compete and non-solicitation agreement. The appellate court reversed, holding that ERHM is the prevailing party entitled to attorney's fees beca
-
The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a temporary injunction because the trial court failed to make sufficient factual findings required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c) to support the four mandatory elements for injunctive relief.
-
A husband in a pending dissolution action appealed an ex parte temporary injunction prohibiting him from conducting specified financial transactions. The court affirmed the issuance of the injunction as legally sufficient but reversed and remanded regarding the trial court's fail
-
Florida appellate court affirmed the trial court's order granting equal time sharing and an injunction preventing removal of the child from the state, but reversed the child support determination for failure to include specific income findings and a child support guidelines works
-
2012 WL 165561·
Del. Ch.·
2015-01-22
·cited 3×
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for an expedited hearing on a preliminary injunction, finding insufficient threat of irreparable harm. However, the court granted the motion in part by scheduling a two-day trial on the merits within 90-120 days to definitively resolve the
-
The court held that the appeal of a temporary injunction is moot once the injunction expires by its own terms.
-
In this defamation case, appellants (stand-up comedians) appealed an order limiting their damages from a wrongfully issued ex parte temporary injunction to the $100 bond amount. The court held that where an injunction is obtained ex parte without notice and the enjoined party pro
-
The appellate court held that the trial court erred in granting a temporary injunction without specifying the reasons for its entry, as required by rule.
-
Citizens for Sunshine appealed the denial of a temporary injunction against Martin County School Board members who visited an adult education school without providing public notice. The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial, holding that while the unnoticed visit vi
-
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of a temporary injunction, finding no abuse of discretion because the appellant failed to demonstrate irreparable harm.
-
The court held that a party seeking a temporary injunction must present sufficient evidence to satisfy all four required elements, not just conclusory allegations or a verified complaint alone.
-
Miami-Dade County appealed a trial court's temporary injunction ordering restoration of power to Wilson's nightclub property. The appellate court reversed, holding that Wilson failed to exhaust administrative remedies and received adequate notice of the administrative hearing des
-
The court affirmed a trial court's decision to pierce the corporate veil between parent company Wavestone Properties and its subsidiary 17315 Collins Avenue, LLC, allowing a judgment creditor's lien to attach to the subsidiary's real property. The court found that Wavestone impro
-
581 F. Supp. 2d 1226·
S.D. Fla.·
2008-09-24
·cited 3×
The court held that a prevailing party under the Copyright Act can be eligible for attorney's fees under 17 U.S.C. § 505 and § 412(2) even if they elect to receive actual damages instead of statutory damages.
-
576 F. Supp. 2d 1301·
N.D. Fla.·
2008-08-06
·cited 3×
The court held that the statute compelling businesses to allow customers to store guns in vehicles is unconstitutional due to an irrational distinction between businesses, while the portion compelling employees with permits to do so is valid.
-
Briceño appeals the denial of his motion for a temporary injunction to preserve accrued interest on funds he claims are subject to a constructive trust. The court affirms, holding that the res of an alleged constructive trust is limited to the principal funds, not accrued interes
-
504 F. Supp. 2d 1278·
M.D. Fla.·
2007-08-10
·cited 3×
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for trademark and trade dress infringement and dilution claims.
-
447 F. Supp. 2d 1314·
S.D. Fla.·
2006-08-28
·cited 3×
The court held that the Third-Party Voter Registration Law unconstitutionally discriminates by exempting political parties and imposes unconstitutional fines that chill First Amendment rights.
-
439 F. Supp. 2d 1242·
S.D. Fla.·
2006-07-24
·cited 3×
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from removing books from school libraries pending further proceedings.