Preliminary Injunction

3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Plain Dealer Publ'g Co. v. Cleveland Typographical Union # 53
  520 F.2d 1220· 6th Cir.· 1975-08-15 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the exception to the Norris-LaGuardia Act's anti-injunction provision, as established in Boys Markets, does not permit an injunction against unions engaged in a work stoppage out of deference to another union's lawful picket line, especially when the work stop
• Erle E. Peacock, Jr. v. Bd. OF Regents OF the Univs. & State Colleges OF Ariz.
  510 F.2d 1324· 9th Cir.· 1975-02-04 ·cited 14×
  The court held that a post-suspension hearing, rather than a pre-suspension hearing, was sufficient to satisfy due process for a university department head suspended from administrative duties, given the university's interest in efficient administration.
• DOE v. Mundy
  514 F.2d 1179· 7th Cir.· 1975-01-30 ·cited 14×
  The court affirmed the district court's order granting a preliminary injunction, finding that the hospital's rule restricting abortions was likely unconstitutional and that the injunction was properly issued.
• State OF Neb. v. Norbert T. Tiemann
  510 F.2d 446· 8th Cir.· 1975-01-28 ·cited 14×
  The denial of a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is affirmed because the state failed to demonstrate a substantial probability of success on the merits regarding the Administrator's decision to withhold federal highway funds.
• In re Boston & Providence R.R. Corp. In re Boston & Providence R.R. Dev. Grp.
  501 F.2d 545· 1st Cir.· 1974-07-17 ·cited 14×
  The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction and the order barring claims against the Charge Trustee, but remanded the award of attorney's fees for further proceedings.
• Berrigan v. Sigler
  499 F.2d 514· D.C. Cir.· 1974-05-01 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the Parole Board's denial of a parolee's request to travel to North Vietnam was a valid exercise of its supervisory authority, considering both the parolee's status and national interest concerns.
• Murry v. Am. Standard, Inc.
  488 F.2d 529· 5th Cir.· 1973-12-14 ·cited 14×
  A private individual may obtain a preliminary injunction in a Title VII action without demonstrating imminent irreparable injury, as the statute itself provides for such relief.
• Jennings v. Boenning & Co. & Boenning & Scattergood, Inc.
  482 F.2d 1128· 3d Cir.· 1973-07-16 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the district court erred in issuing a preliminary injunction to restrain execution of a state court judgment, as neither the Securities Exchange Act's § 21(e) nor the Anti-Injunction Act's 'necessary in aid of jurisdiction' exception applied.
• Goodwin v. Oswald
  462 F.2d 1237· 2d Cir.· 1972-06-19 ·cited 14×·via Preliminary Injunction Standard
  The court held that the Legal Aid Society's extensive communication to inmates, which included assertions about union recognition and potential conflict, was not merely legal advice but constituted solicitation and a threat to prison order, justifying prison officials' refusal to
• Scooper Dooper, Inc. v. Kraftco Corp.
  460 F.2d 1204· 3d Cir.· 1972-05-10 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
• Santiago v. Corporacion de Renovacion Urbana Y Vivienda de Puerto RICO
  453 F.2d 794· 1st Cir.· 1972-01-05 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the dismissal of the complaint was erroneous because it was based on evidence presented solely for a temporary restraining order without proper notice, and disputed factual issues precluded summary judgment.
• The Morning Tel. v. Bertram A. Powers
  450 F.2d 97· 2d Cir.· 1971-10-13 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the orders denying the union's motion to dissolve the temporary restraining order were effectively preliminary injunctions and thus appealable. The court reversed the orders granting injunctive relief and affirmed the order denying jurisdiction.
• Culpepper v. Reynolds Metals Co.
  442 F.2d 1078· 5th Cir.· 1971-05-07 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the district court's finding of a technical violation of Title VII was supported by the evidence, and the award of attorneys' fees was not an abuse of discretion.
• Nw. Airlines, Inc. v. The AIR Line Pilots Ass'n
  442 F.2d 246· 8th Cir.· 1970-12-03 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the dispute over whether ALPA members could refuse to cross a sister union's picket lines was a minor dispute subject to arbitration under the System Board of Adjustment, and ordered immediate arbitration.
• Dekar Indus., Inc. v. The Bissett-Berman Corp.
  434 F.2d 1304· 9th Cir.· 1970-11-19 ·cited 14×
  The court held that a preliminary injunction restraining defendants from misusing plaintiff's alleged trade secrets was valid and properly granted.
• Appalachian Volunteers, Inc. v. Clark
  432 F.2d 530· 6th Cir.· 1970-09-11 ·cited 14×
  The court affirmed the district court's remand order and dismissal of the federal action, finding that removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443 was limited to racial equality claims and that appellants failed to exhaust state remedies before seeking federal injunctive relief.
• Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Grossbardt
  428 F.2d 551· 2d Cir.· 1970-06-17 ·cited 14×
  The court affirmed the grant of a preliminary injunction, finding no abuse of discretion given the admitted copying of a copyrighted pin after notice.
• Hills Bros. Coffee, Inc. v. Hills Supermarkets, Inc.
  428 F.2d 379· 2d Cir.· 1970-06-09 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the denial of a preliminary injunction against the use of 'Hills' on coffee products was an abuse of discretion, as confusion was likely.
• Chris-Craft Indus., Inc. v. Bangor Punta Corp. & David W. Wallace
  426 F.2d 569· 2d Cir.· 1970-04-28 ·cited 14×
  The court affirms the denial of a preliminary injunction.
• Redac Project 6426, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co.
  412 F.2d 1043· 2d Cir.· 1969-06-16 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the plaintiffs' action with prejudice due to their repeated delays and in issuing a permanent injunction against further actions seeking injunctive relief.
• Herschel Levy v. Gourmet Masters, Inc.
  214 So. 2d 82· Fla. 3d DCA· 1968-03-26 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  In this corporate stockholder dispute, the court reversed a judicial sale of Gourmet Masters, Inc. assets for $4,500 due to inadequate price and failure to disclose the nature and amount of assets being sold. The court also reversed a temporary injunction issued against judgment
• United States v. Houston H. Feaster
  376 F.2d 147· 5th Cir.· 1967-03-29 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to issue a preliminary injunction, as the issue of carrier status requires a full hearing on the merits.
• Flight Eng'rs' Int'l Ass'n, Eal Chapter, Afl-Cio v. Nat'l Mediation Bd.
  338 F.2d 280· D.C. Cir.· 1964-10-08 ·cited 14×
• H. E. Fletcher Co. v. Rock OF Ages Corp.
  326 F.2d 13· 2d Cir.· 1963-12-23 ·cited 14×·via Preliminary Injunction Standard
  The court held that the preliminary injunction was improvidently issued because the plaintiff did not demonstrate sufficient irreparable harm or likelihood of success on the merits under Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
• Parker v. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc.
  320 F.2d 937· 2d Cir.· 1963-08-05 ·cited 14×
  The court held that an injunction restraining the publication of a court filing is appealable as a preliminary injunction and can be upheld under the court's equitable powers, but an injunction restraining communication about the matters within the filing violates the First Amend
• Leesona Corp. v. Cotwool Mfg. Corp.
  315 F.2d 538· 4th Cir.· 1963-03-19 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court held that a district court has the discretion to temporarily stay arbitration proceedings ancillary to a patent infringement suit, even if the arbitration clause is otherwise valid.
• Fay Heasley v. United States
  312 F.2d 641· 8th Cir.· 1963-01-16 ·cited 14×
  The court held that a criminal contempt conviction based on violating an injunction that exceeded the court's jurisdiction is void and must be reversed.
• Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Cardinale Trucking Corp.
  308 F.2d 435· 3d Cir.· 1962-09-28 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the District Court erred by failing to make adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before denying a preliminary injunction.
• Barnwell Drilling Co., Inc. v. SUN OIL Co.
  300 F.2d 298· 5th Cir.· 1962-03-20 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a temporary injunction, as the evidence did not clearly show imminent irreparable harm.
• Lane v. Reubin J. Clein
  137 So. 2d 15· Fla. 3d DCA· 1962-02-01 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  In this interlocutory appeal, a Florida appellate court affirmed the dissolution of a temporary injunction that had restrained defendants from making derogatory statements about plaintiff's business. The court found no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in dissolving the inju
• Carroll v. Associated Musicians OF Greater NEW York and Al Manuti
  284 F.2d 91· 2d Cir.· 1960-11-17 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in granting a temporary injunction against a welfare plan that appeared to violate Section 302(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act.
• Carpenters' Dist. Council v. Cicci
  261 F.2d 5· 6th Cir.· 1958-11-19 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the district court erred in issuing a preliminary injunction without making required findings of fact and conclusions of law, and without affording the defendant a full hearing on disputed factual issues.
• Columbia Research Corp. & Allerton Pharmacal Corp. v. Schaffer
  256 F.2d 677· 2d Cir.· 1958-05-13 ·cited 14×
• Bd. of Supervisors of La. State Univ. & Agric. & Mech. Coll. v. Tureaud
  228 F.2d 895· 5th Cir.· 1956-01-06 ·cited 14×
  The court held that its prior order granting a rehearing and setting aside an affirmance was erroneous, and reinstated the original order affirming the district court's decision.
• Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Union v. Boca Raton Club, Inc.
  73 So. 2d 867· Fla.· 1954-07-06 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  A Florida Supreme Court decision addressing whether a labor union and individual employees could obtain equitable relief against a hotel employer for alleged unfair labor practices, including using company housing to coerce employees during a labor dispute. The court held that wh
• Embassy Dairy, Inc. v. Camalier
  211 F.2d 41· D.C. Cir.· 1954-02-11 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the dismissal of the suit was error because the complaint stated a case for equitable relief within the District Court's jurisdiction.
• ALL Am. Airways, Inc. v. Vill. of Cedar-Hurst
  201 F.2d 273· 2d Cir.· 1953-01-07 ·cited 14×·via Injunction Pendente Lite
  The court held that there is a substantial question regarding the ordinance's validity against federal supremacy, and thus the injunction against its enforcement should be continued pending trial.
• Miami Retreat Found. v. Ervin
  62 So. 2d 748· Fla.· 1952-12-19 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  The Florida Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision that had found Miami Retreat Foundation not to be a charitable organization and had removed directors and granted Ruth Reed half the Foundation's assets. The court held that the Foundation qualified as a charitable organiz
• Chicago Great W. Ry. Co. v. Chicago
  193 F.2d 975· 8th Cir.· 1952-02-05 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the District Court had jurisdiction to issue a preliminary injunction requiring a railroad to provide switching service, even on intrastate traffic, when a substantial federal question was presented.
• Babcock v. Koepke
  175 F.2d 923· 9th Cir.· 1949-06-24 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the appellant failed to exhaust administrative remedies by not presenting his rent control non-applicability argument to the Area Rent Director before filing suit.
• Peters v. Standard Oil Co. of Tex.
  174 F.2d 162· 5th Cir.· 1949-05-04 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the federal district court had jurisdiction to remove the case from state court and did not err in granting a preliminary injunction to protect that jurisdiction.
• Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Randolph
  164 F.2d 4· 8th Cir.· 1947-11-05 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court held that the issuance of a temporary injunction was erroneous because the dispute constituted a labor dispute within the purview of the Railway Labor Act and Norris-LaGuardia Act, requiring administrative resolution.
• Bowles v. Rice
  152 F.2d 543· 6th Cir.· 1946-01-07 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court held that the appeal was untimely because it was filed more than 30 days after the entry of the interlocutory order denying the injunction.
• In re S. State St. BLDG. Corp. Hofheimer v. Gold
  140 F.2d 363· 7th Cir.· 1943-12-15 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court held that a party not formally recognized as a party in interest in bankruptcy reorganization proceedings, even if allowed to participate, lacks standing to appeal the court's orders.
• Edner v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co.
  138 F.2d 327· 3d Cir.· 1943-10-27 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the district court lacked jurisdiction because the insurance company's deposit of the cash surrender value was an insufficient compliance with the Interpleader Act when the dispute concerned ownership and future policy benefits, not just the present cash value
• ELM Spring Farm, Inc. v. United States
  127 F.2d 920· 1st Cir.· 1942-05-08 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the Elm Spring Farm Cooperative was a handler of milk, not a producer, and its milk from 'herd-masters' was not its own farm production, thus it was obligated to make equalization payments. Elm Spring Farm, Inc. was also held accountable.
• White v. Leanore Frocks, Inc.
  120 F.2d 113· 2d Cir.· 1941-06-04 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the trial judge was correct in denying a preliminary injunction because the validity of the design patents was not clear enough for such relief.
• Simms v. Patterson
  53 Fla. 984· Fla.· 1907-01-01 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  Robert Simms sought a temporary injunction against Wilson Patterson to enforce a five-year employment contract that prohibited Patterson from engaging in the liquor business in Florida or other states. The trial court denied the application for temporary restraining order, and th
• Weeks v. J. C. Turner Lumber Co.
  53 Fla. 793· Fla.· 1907-01-01 ·cited 14×·via Temporary Injunction
  The appellate court reversed a lower court's decision, finding that the bill of complaint was too vague to grant equitable relief. The court held that the complainant failed to clearly allege undisputed ownership of the land, which was necessary to justify an injunction against t
• Fuller v. Emory H. Cason
  26 Fla. 476· Fla.· 1890-06-01 ·cited 14×
  Fuller and others appeal an injunction granted by the lower court at the request of attorney Cason, who sought to prevent the sale and slaughter of cattle allegedly transferred fraudulently by his debtor Mary Fuller. The Florida Supreme Court reversed, holding that the injunction