-
784 F.2d 1033·
10th Cir.·
1986-02-27
·cited 6×
The court held that the military search procedures used did not violate the Fourth Amendment, the denial of severance motions was not an abuse of discretion, the admission of a prior conviction for impeachment was proper, and the refusal to sentence under the Youth Corrections Ac
-
447 F.2d 129·
8th Cir.·
1971-09-01
·cited 6×
The court held that the seizure and search of the vehicle were lawful, and the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, rejecting claims of prejudice from a joint trial.
-
758 F.2d 1151·
7th Cir.·
1985-03-27
·cited 5×
The simultaneous trial of two criminal defendants in the same courtroom before two juries does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
143 So. 3d 1018·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2014-07-23
·cited 4×
The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to sever the trials of co-defendants.
-
986 F.2d 349·
10th Cir.·
1993-02-16
·cited 4×
The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the evidence was sufficient to prove distribution, the denial of severance was not an abuse of discretion, and sentencing calculations were proper. The denial of a new trial based on newly discovered evidence was also affirmed.
-
875 F.2d 535·
6th Cir.·
1989-05-18
·cited 4×
The joint indictment and trial violated Rule 8(b) and prejudiced the defendants, requiring severance.
-
864 F.2d 71·
8th Cir.·
1988-12-20
The court held that the district court did not err in denying motions for severance or suppression, and that sufficient evidence supported the convictions.