56 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 2,102 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · browse and sort
-
The court held that evidence seized pursuant to a lawful search warrant is admissible, even if obtained after an allegedly unlawful warrantless arrest, if the evidence is not the fruit of that arrest.
-
The court held that the initial opening of the package by airline personnel was not government action subject to the Fourth Amendment, and that any inaccuracies in the search warrant affidavit were made in good faith and did not invalidate the warrant. The warrantless entry into
-
The court held that the evidence presented was sufficient for conviction on all three counts, and therefore affirmed the conviction.
-
The court held that the evidence was not obtained as a result of an illegal border detention and affirmed the conviction.
-
The court held that the defendants' convictions were supported by ample evidence and that the trial court did not commit reversible error.
-
The court held that the appellant's conviction for simple possession was valid, as it did not rely on the unconstitutional presumption, but the sentence was vacated due to the district court misapprehending the applicable sentencing range.
-
The court held that there was sufficient evidence to convict the appellant of drug offenses, despite his claim that the alleged acts occurred while he was incarcerated.
-
476 F.2d 280·
5th Cir.·
1973-04-09
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support Alverez's conviction for conspiracy to possess and distribute narcotics.