Possession Of Cocaine Hydrochloride With Intent To Distribute

10 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. Dudley Lee Berry
  670 F.2d 583· 5th Cir.· 1982-03-19 ·cited 188×
  Appellants voluntarily consented to accompany agents to the DEA office, making their subsequent detention lawful.
• United States v. Brand
  556 F.2d 1312· 5th Cir.· 1977-08-05 ·cited 70×
  The court held that a 20-month preindictment delay did not violate due process or speedy trial rights, and the search warrant was validly issued based on corroborated hearsay and plain view evidence.
• United States v. Pulvano
  629 F.2d 1151· 5th Cir.· 1980-11-07 ·cited 49×
  The court held that the evidence obtained from the appellant's person and suitcase was admissible because the initial encounter was not a seizure, the subsequent arrest was based on probable cause, and the consent to search was voluntary.
• United States v. Berd
  634 F.2d 979· 5th Cir.· 1981-01-22 ·cited 40×
  The court held that the initial encounter was not a seizure, and subsequent detentions were supported by reasonable suspicion, rendering the search of the abandoned briefcase lawful.
• United States v. Lopez
  758 F.2d 1517· 11th Cir.· 1985-04-29 ·cited 38×
  The court held that the co-conspirator statements were admissible, fingerprint evidence was properly admitted, and jury instructions were adequate, affirming the conviction.
• United States v. Setzer
  654 F.2d 354· 5th Cir.· 1981-08-27 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights were not violated because the initial encounter was a permissible police-citizen contact, and the subsequent seizure was justified by probable cause established by the defendant's own inculpatory statement.
• United States v. Dudley Lee Berry
  636 F.2d 1075· 5th Cir.· 1981-02-13 ·cited 21×
  The court held that the initial encounter was not a seizure, and reasonable suspicion existed at the time of the subsequent seizure, thus the denial of the motion to suppress was proper.
• United States v. German Mejia
  720 F.2d 1378· 5th Cir.· 1983-11-25 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the defendant's consent to an X-ray search was voluntary and not coerced, and that he failed to establish the elements of a duress defense.
• United States v. Constanza D'Allerman
  712 F.2d 100· 5th Cir.· 1983-07-18 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the appellant voluntarily consented to the X-ray examination, making the evidence of cocaine admissible.
• United States v. Moeller
  644 F.2d 518· 5th Cir.· 1981-05-08 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the initial stop was a permissible police-citizen contact and that the subsequent search was valid due to voluntary consent and probable cause.