Possession Of Cannabis With Intent To Sell

65 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Ragin v. State
  186 So. 3d 589· Fla. 4th DCA· 2016-02-24
  Ragin appeals his conviction for possession of cannabis with intent to sell, challenging the trial court's exclusion of evidence regarding a civil forfeiture settlement in which police returned half of seized currency to him. The Fourth District DCA reversed, holding that evidenc
• Graham v. State
  162 So. 3d 250· Fla. 1st DCA· 2015-02-25
• Harris v. State
  149 So. 3d 1160· Fla. 4th DCA· 2014-10-22
  The court held that where evidence is insufficient to prove an element of a charged offense (proximity to a park), but sufficient to prove a lesser included offense (possession with intent to sell), the appellate court must direct the trial court to enter judgment for the lesser
• Phillipe v. State
  37 So. 3d 301· Fla. 4th DCA· 2010-04-14
• Cordaro v. State
  28 So. 3d 247· Fla. 4th DCA· 2010-03-10
• McFEE v. State
  990 So. 2d 12· Fla. 5th DCA· 2008-08-01
  Florida appellate court affirmed drug trafficking convictions but reversed the conviction for simple possession of cannabis as duplicative of the possession-with-intent-to-sell conviction, violating double jeopardy.
• August v. State
  988 So. 2d 141· Fla. 5th DCA· 2008-08-01
  The court held that a discovery violation claim was without merit, but a double jeopardy claim regarding two cannabis convictions was valid.
• Thompson v. State
  979 So. 2d 356· Fla. 5th DCA· 2008-04-11
  Joseph Thompson appealed the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence from a drug search warrant and challenged his dual convictions for possession of cannabis in excess of twenty grams and possession of cannabis with intent to sell as violating double jeopardy pro
• Williams v. State
  958 So. 2d 480· Fla. 5th DCA· 2007-05-18
• Harris v. State
  945 So. 2d 584· Fla. 4th DCA· 2006-12-13
  The court held that the trial court erred by failing to conduct a Richardson hearing to address the state's discovery violation regarding a prior drug sale, which prejudiced the defendant and required a new trial.
• Augustus v. State
  773 So. 2d 104· Fla. 5th DCA· 2000-12-01
  The court held that a police officer's generalized safety concerns arising from having a suspect accompany him to his vehicle to fill out a trespass warning do not meet the threshold for a lawful pat-down search for weapons.
• State v. Hill
  770 So. 2d 280· Fla. 5th DCA· 2000-11-03
  The appellate court reviewed a trial court's suppression of evidence, specifically cannabis found in a vehicle, after the defendant fled from deputies who observed what they believed to be a drug transaction.
• Montaque v. State
  699 So. 2d 279· Fla. 4th DCA· 1997-08-27
• McLAREN v. State
  634 So. 2d 325· Fla. 1st DCA· 1994-04-12
• Johnson v. State
  606 So. 2d 1287· Fla. 4th DCA· 1992-11-12
  The court reversed and remanded because the defendant's seven-year sentence for cannabis possession with intent to sell exceeded the statutory maximum of five years, and the judgment incorrectly classified cocaine possession with intent to sell as a first-degree rather than secon