7,506 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 5,490 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
A defendant's vague allegation of oversight is insufficient to require a hearing on a motion to set a new bond after failing to appear.
-
960 So. 2d 793·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2007-06-18
·cited 4×
-
948 So. 2d 852·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2007-01-31
·cited 4×
The trial court's blanket policy requiring personal appearance at arraignments, overriding the rule allowing written pleas, arbitrarily denied the defendant a privilege afforded by the rule.
-
946 So. 2d 602·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2006-12-29
·cited 4×
Andreas Obojes appealed the denial of his habeas corpus petition challenging his 1990 armed sexual battery conviction and 40-year departure sentence. The court affirmed the denial and imposed sanctions prohibiting Obojes from filing further pro se pleadings challenging his convic
-
947 So. 2d 504·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2006-12-06
·cited 4×
Juvenile detainees challenge Miami-Dade's detention hearing procedures, alleging they were denied hearings within 24 hours of custody as required by Florida law. The court agrees, holding that Florida Statutes section 985.215(2) mandates detention hearings within 24 hours of when
-
941 So. 2d 494·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2006-11-07
·cited 4×
Florida appellate court quashed an order committing an incompetent defendant to the state hospital because the trial court found it improbable he would regain competency, which contradicts the statutory requirement for commitment under Fla. Stat. § 916.13(1)(c).
-
940 So. 2d 579·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2006-10-30
·cited 4×
Tyler Porter appealed his conviction for violating probation after successfully completing a youthful offender boot camp. The appellate court reversed the trial court's denial of his habeas corpus petition, finding that Porter was entitled to immediate release because his current
-
A petition for writ of habeas corpus cannot be used to collaterally attack a criminal judgment and sentence, and the trial court lacked jurisdiction to review a judgment from another county.
-
-
929 So. 2d 549·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2006-04-07
·cited 4×
MacFarland appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion for relief based on newly discovered evidence. He claims that John Wright's affidavit exonerating him of armed burglary should justify withdrawal of his nolo contendere plea. The court affirmed the denial, finding the cl
-
454 F. Supp. 2d 1137·
M.D. Fla.·
2006-02-08
·cited 4×
The court denied Petitioner Oba Chandler’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, finding his claims regarding ineffective assistance of counsel did not meet the AEDPA standards for relief.
-
917 So. 2d 342·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2005-12-23
·cited 4×
G.L., a juvenile convicted of marijuana possession, petitioned for habeas corpus relief challenging his placement in Restrictiveness Level Six despite the Department of Juvenile Justice's recommendation for probation. The court denied the petition without prejudice due to an inad
-
915 So. 2d 767·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2005-12-09
·cited 4×
The trial court erred in ordering a juvenile into secure detention without making a specific finding of significantly changed circumstances as required by statute.
-
915 So. 2d 732·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2005-12-07
·cited 4×
Trial court lacked authority to sua sponte revoke pretrial release and increase bond without State application or notice; habeas corpus petition granted and original bond reinstated.
-
916 So. 2d 891·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2005-11-09
·cited 4×
Sheriff Raulerson appealed a trial court order granting injunctive relief to inmates Marshall and Milton Mitchell regarding conditions of confinement at the Okeechobee County Jail. The appellate court reversed, finding that the Mitchells failed to establish the clear legal right
-
909 So. 2d 534·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2005-08-31
·cited 4×
The appellate court affirmed the dismissal of the habeas corpus petition, even though the trial court lacked jurisdiction, because the petition was an improper substitute for a postconviction motion.
-
896 So. 2d 974·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2005-04-01
·cited 4×
The appellate court reversed the trial court's summary denial of a habeas petition seeking permission to file a belated post-conviction relief motion, finding the trial court misunderstood which sentence was at issue and failed to address whether the doctrine of laches barred the
-
371 F. Supp. 2d 1326·
M.D. Fla.·
2005-01-26
·cited 4×
The Florida Parole Commission violated Petitioner's due process rights by disregarding a hearing examiner's factual findings and substituting its own in revoking his control release.
-
The State appealed a circuit court order releasing Jose Ortega from pretrial detention under Florida's Jimmy Ryce Act for sexually violent predators. The appellate court granted the petition for writ of certiorari and reversed, holding that the circuit court erroneously interpret
-
890 So. 2d 341·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2004-12-14
·cited 4×
Trial court lacked authority to sua sponte revoke pretrial release and increase bond without state motion and proper notice; habeas corpus granted and petitioner restored to original release conditions.
-
889 So. 2d 123·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2004-11-24
·cited 4×
A defendant may be entitled to file a belated motion for post-conviction relief if their attorney frustrates their intention to file such a motion in a timely fashion.
-
A trial court lacks statutory authority to impose a term of imprisonment as a sanction for violating a pretrial intervention program (PTI) agreement.
-
879 So. 2d 60·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2004-07-23
·cited 4×
Pedro Juan Hernandez petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his detention based on a positive drug test ordered by the trial judge without legal justification. The Florida District Court of Appeal granted the petition, finding the drug test was ordered without probabl
-
The court held that the circuit court did not depart from the essential requirements of law by not granting relief on a claim raised for the first time in a reply brief.
-
867 So. 2d 550·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2004-02-27
·cited 4×
The circuit court erred by denying Duckworth's habeas corpus petition without an order to show cause where he adequately alleged that the hearing examiner failed to subpoena two material witnesses for his conditional release revocation hearing.
-
James Crosby, secretary of the Department of Corrections, appeals a mandamus order requiring the department to credit McNeal with 308 days of tolled time on his 1995 conviction against his sentence for a 1996 conviction. The Fifth District quashed the order, holding that Evans v.
-
The Court found that the Petitioner's waiver of his Miranda rights was not knowing and intelligent due to his severe intellectual deficits, and therefore his confession should have been suppressed.
-
840 So. 2d 352·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2003-02-28
·cited 4×
Christopher Hawn appealed the summary denial of his second Rule 3.800(a) motion seeking to correct his 1988 conviction for burglary and sexual battery. The court affirmed the denial, finding Hawn's claims were successive, already rejected on the merits in prior proceedings, and p
-
The court held that the trial court did not err in denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus.
-
837 So. 2d 396·
Fla.·
2003-01-09
·cited 4×
William Reaves, a death row inmate, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The Florida Supreme Court denied the petition, finding that Reaves' claims either involved variants of issues already decided on direct appeal or were
-
838 So. 2d 480·
Fla.·
2002-11-21
·cited 4×
Robert Brian Waterhouse, a death row inmate, petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus, asserting four claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel relating to his 1980 first-degree murder conviction and death sentence. The Court denied the petitio
-
A juvenile petitioner sought habeas corpus relief challenging his detention beyond twenty-one days in a secure juvenile detention facility. The court held that the state's mere assertion of intent to file adult charges, without demonstrating how the nature of the charges requires
-
Tyrone Moore sought habeas corpus relief, claiming his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the trial court's denial of his request to proceed pro se. The court held that the trial court erred in denying Moore's self-representation request based on his perce
-
Burley Gilliam, sentenced to death for the 1988 conviction of first-degree murder and sexual battery, appealed the denial of his Rule 3.850 postconviction relief motion and filed a habeas petition. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the denial of postconviction relief and the hab
-
Dana Peacock appeals the trial court's revocation of his supersedeas bond after his conviction for sexual offenses involving minors. The appellate court found that Peacock was not intentionally or willfully violating the electronic monitoring condition when he was released from j
-
Randy Steven Martin filed a successive petition for habeas corpus challenging his conviction and sentence. The Third District Court of Appeal denied the petition, finding that Martin was abusing the judicial process through repetitive and baseless filings, and directing the clerk
-
Jerry L. Wilson sought habeas corpus relief challenging the forfeiture of his prison gain time credits upon revocation of his control release. The Florida Supreme Court denied the petition, holding that Wilson waived any ex post facto claims by voluntarily accepting early release
-
-
764 So. 2d 649·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2000-05-08
·cited 4×
The court held that appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise the issue of the trial court's alleged violation of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.410.
-
779 So. 2d 366·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2000-04-28
·cited 4×
Marese Barnes petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for failing to challenge his violent career criminal sentence on constitutional grounds. The court granted relief, finding that appellate counsel's failure to raise a viable
-
756 So. 2d 232·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2000-04-26
·cited 4×
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied because it was untimely filed and petitioner did not allege he was affirmatively misled by counsel.
-
Benjamin Fannin appeals the trial court's denial of his Rule 3.850 postconviction relief motion, challenging his conviction based on allegedly perjured testimony and his sentence of consecutive minimum mandatory sentences that exceeded the sentencing guidelines. The court reverse
-
The court held that a petition for writ of habeas corpus cannot be used to seek monetary damages or compel criminal charges.
-
George Williams petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus seeking overcrowding credits under Lynce v. Mathis and Gomez v. Singletary. The court held that individualized factual determinations regarding credit eligibility are better suited for circuit courts
-
The court held that the trial court erred in imposing a general sentence for multiple counts and in failing to award sufficient credit for time served.
-
James Kerklin, an inmate in the Florida Department of Corrections, petitioned for habeas corpus to challenge a detainer placed by the Highlands County Sheriff seeking to return him to county jail to complete a two-year sentence after his DOC sentence. The Second District Court of
-
736 So. 2d 744·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1999-06-23
·cited 4×
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order excusing a biological father's consent to adoption and denying his habeas corpus petition regarding custody. The court rejected the father's due process challenge and upheld the finding of abandonment un
-
The court held that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the meritorious issue of an erroneous jury instruction on entrapment.
-
727 So. 2d 349·
Fla. 5th DCA·
1999-02-19
·cited 4×
Moses Green, a former juvenile offender, appealed the denial of his habeas corpus petition challenging his 1991 plea to second-degree murder. The court affirmed, holding that Green's claims were barred by the two-year statute of limitations for Rule 3.850 motions and could not be
-
The court held that the petitioner's unrebutted testimony and affidavit were sufficient to establish his inability to pay the purge amount, and incarceration was therefore improper.