Permanent Injunction

757 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 75 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Barrow (No. 2)
  34 Fla. Supp. 129· Nassau Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1970-07-09
  The court held that recorded easements run with the land and are binding on a subsequent purchaser with actual knowledge, even if they dispute the easement's validity.
• Samartino v. Dade Cnty. Med. Ass'n, Inc.
  32 Fla. Supp. 67· Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1969-04-24
  Dr. Samartino challenged the Dade County Medical Association's prohibition on specialty headings in telephone directories as violating his contractual and constitutional rights. The court granted a permanent injunction allowing the plaintiff to list specialty headings in the clas
• Sharp v. Sharp
  209 So. 2d 245· Fla. 2d DCA· 1968-04-05
  In this appeal from contempt adjudications and permanent injunction orders, the court affirmed findings against John W. Hunter for invading the privacy of the appellees through investigations but reversed the contempt findings against Grace Hunter and John W. Hunter Associates, I
• Samartino v. Dade Cnty. Med. Ass'n, Inc.
  28 Fla. Supp. 184· Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1967-06-22
  The court held that the medical association's ruling prohibiting specialty headings in telephone directories, without proper due process, violated constitutional rights and granted injunctive relief.
• Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists v. United Aircraft Corp.
  333 F.2d 367· 2d Cir.· 1964-06-23
  The court held that federal courts are prohibited by 28 U.S.C. § 2283 from enjoining state court proceedings in this case. Federal courts must trust state courts to protect federal rights.
• Tallahassee Theatres, Inc. v. DUE
  22 Fla. Supp. 55· Leon Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1963-12-05
  In this 1963 case, a Florida circuit court granted a permanent injunction against civil rights protesters demonstrating at segregated movie theaters in Tallahassee. The court balanced the theaters' property rights and freedom from interference against the protesters' constitution
• Dade Cnty. v. Lamb
  21 Fla. Supp. 53· Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1963-02-26
  The court held that defendants must remove obstructions in the Coral Gables Canal and are permanently enjoined from interfering with its flow and the county's maintenance, as the canal is part of a vital public water control system.
• Cataldi v. Werth
  313 F.2d 553· D.C. Cir.· 1962-11-15
  The court held that a restrictive covenant prohibiting the sale of liquor on the property was enforceable against the current owner, despite the property's commercial use and the passage of time.
• Poinsett Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Hammond
  309 F.2d 718· 4th Cir.· 1962-11-05
  The court dismissed the appeal with prejudice, finding Hammond's arguments for relief from judgment and appeal without merit due to his own delays and failure to present evidence.
• Webb City, Inc. v. Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People
  18 Fla. Supp. 40· Pinellas Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1961-05-03
  Webb City, a private business, sought a permanent injunction against the NAACP and its local chapter members for conducting a peaceful picket and boycott campaign protesting the store's segregation policies and employment practices. The court granted the permanent injunction, hol
• 1901 Collins Corp. v. S. Bell TEL Co.
  10 Fla. Supp. 85· Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1957-01-27
  The court rejected the State Attorney General's petition to terminate a hotel's telephone service based on alleged gambling law violations. Finding insufficient evidence that the hotel's phones were used for illegal gambling, the court granted the hotel's injunction preventing re
• Great N. Ry. Co. v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers
  232 F.2d 628· 9th Cir.· 1956-04-18
  The court held that the appellant's complaint did not present a sufficient cause for equitable relief, thus affirming the dismissal.
• State ex rel. Marsh v. Simberg
  4 Fla. Supp. 85· Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1953-07-31
  The State of Florida, on behalf of county and municipal officials, challenged Miami Beach ordinances that permitted riparian owners to construct bulkheads and fill the foreshore (land between high and low tide marks) in the Atlantic Ocean. The court held that the state holds the
• Fla. Power Corp. v. Pinellas Util. Bd.
  181 F.2d 547· 5th Cir.· 1950-04-18
  The court held that the district court correctly dismissed the suit because no substantial federal question was presented, and the issues raised were primarily matters of state law.
• Fisher v. Time, Inc.
  153 F.2d 806· 7th Cir.· 1946-03-04
  The court held that the district court did not err in denying a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because it should not interfere with the jurisdiction already obtained by a state court of concurrent jurisdiction.
• Magee v. Bunting
  Del. Ch.·
  The court held that the plaintiff, Magee, owns the irrigation systems. The court found that the lease provision regarding improvements did not apply to pre-existing systems and that an oral agreement between Magee and the landlord's predecessor granted Magee ownership. Consequent