-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-03-19
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim against Centurion and dismissed her ADA, equal protection, due process, and privacy claims against it. The court also found that the plaintiff failed to properly exhaust administrative remedies regarding her claims against
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-22
The court held that the amended complaint does not constitute a shotgun pleading and properly pleads alternative claims, allowing claims against Richard Cole individually to proceed, but dismissing the unjust enrichment claim against Donald Williams' estate.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-30
The court held that the plaintiff adequately stated a claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need and retaliation, and that the defendant failed to meet his burden to show the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-12-15
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a plausible Eighth Amendment claim against the Warden and that claims for monetary damages against the Sergeant in her official capacity were barred by the Eleventh Amendment.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-05-12
The court held that the plaintiff stated plausible claims for retaliation against one defendant, conditions of confinement, due process violations, and excessive force against various defendants, but dismissed the retaliation claim against other defendants.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-01-27
The court held that a pro se prisoner's failure to truthfully disclose his prior litigation history, including prior dismissals under the PLRA's 'three strikes rule,' constitutes an abuse of the judicial process and warrants dismissal of the current action as a sanction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-13
An inmate at Florida State Prison brought a pro se civil rights action against multiple corrections officials alleging deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act, and denial of religious exerci
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-17
The court granted in part and denied in part motions to dismiss, finding that some claims against officers Moody and Faltz could proceed, but claims against Warden Lee were dismissed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-04-06
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state claims for breach of contract, constructive fraud, exploitation of disabled adult, and RICO due to insufficient pleading and application of legal doctrines like the economic loss rule.
-
112 La. 706·
S.D. Fla.·
2018-12-12
The court held that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring claims under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act because the assignments were invalid and the plaintiff did not fall into a category of entities permitted to bring such actions.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2015-02-26
The court held that the Higher Education Act preempts claims under Fla. Stat. § 559.72(7) and § 559.72(18), but not claims under § 559.72(3) and § 559.72(9). The court also found that the plaintiff adequately pleaded knowledge for the § 559.72(9) claim and that a co-defendant's j