-
Del.·
2006-11-08
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court's judgment, holding that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion to trifurcate the damage claims. The court also found that the appellants waived their argument regarding the scope of mental anguish
-
Del. Ch.·
2006-06-06
The Court of Chancery properly denied the plaintiff's claims for specific performance, rescission of the sales agreement, and damages. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate the inadequacy of legal remedies for specific performance, failed to prove intentional or negligent misrepres
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2004-05-26
The court denied all of Defendant Sears' post-trial motions, including motions for remittitur, new trial, and judgment as a matter of law. The court found that the jury's verdicts and damage awards were supported by the evidence and not against the great weight of the evidence, n
-
639 So. 2d 115·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1994-06-22
The court held that the jury instruction on damages was misleading because it did not accurately apprise the jury that the loss of a fetus could be considered a bodily injury to the mother for which she could recover damages.
-
982 F.2d 125·
4th Cir.·
1992-10-15
The court held that substantial evidence supported the Secretary's decisions regarding back pay and overtime, but not the denial of compensatory damages, remanding for a determination of appropriate damages.
-
971 F.2d 142·
8th Cir.·
1992-07-30
The court held that the policy covers damages resulting from an intentional act if the resulting bodily injury or property damage was not expected or intended by the policyholder.
-
956 F.2d 973·
10th Cir.·
1992-02-12
The court held that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find the City liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violating plaintiffs' First Amendment rights, but reversed awards for humiliation due to insufficient evidence.
-
592 So. 2d 382·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1992-01-31
The court affirmed dismissal for failure to state a cause of action but reversed dismissal based on res judicata and collateral estoppel, remanding for further proceedings.
-
887 F.2d 1230·
4th Cir.·
1989-10-23
The court held that the district court erred in basing a solatium award, in part, on a telephone call made almost a year after the decedent's death, as this was an intervening event not reasonably foreseeable and not the basis of a filed claim.
-
856 F.2d 28·
5th Cir.·
1988-09-28
Texas law does not recognize causes of action for minor children or a father to recover damages for mental anguish and loss of society from injuries to a mother/daughter, respectively, when the injury did not result in death.
-
851 F.2d 1369·
11th Cir.·
1988-08-10
The court held that the district court did not err in finding that the insured expected or intended the bodily injury, thus excluding coverage under the homeowner's policy.
-
808 F.2d 1139·
5th Cir.·
1987-02-04
The court held that the district court properly excluded evidence of mental anguish because the plaintiffs failed to establish a basis for recovery, specifically by not proving exposure to harmful chemicals or meeting the criteria for mental anguish claims related to an ongoing o
-
613 F.2d 603·
5th Cir.·
1980-03-14
The court held that while the plaintiff failed to prove the lack of medication caused surgery necessity, he is entitled to damages for pain and suffering from the resulting arrhythmia.
-
228 So. 2d 916·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1969-11-07
The court reversed a directed verdict for a pathologist who performed an unauthorized autopsy on a deceased patient without the family's consent or a request from the prosecutor, finding that Florida law recognizes a cause of action for unauthorized autopsy based on the surviving