-
368 F.2d 1·
8th Cir.·
1966-11-14
·cited 52×
The court held that the district court erred in finding sufficient probable cause for the search warrant, denying the motion to suppress, and admitting the seized evidence and its fruits.
-
496 F.2d 236·
6th Cir.·
1974-05-07
·cited 43×
The court held that appellants lacked standing to challenge the search of a co-defendant's premises, but the search of Taylor's barn was not consensual and evidence obtained was inadmissible.
-
439 F.2d 620·
D.C. Cir.·
1971-01-21
·cited 30×
The court held that the jury's verdict on the issue of responsibility must stand when expert evidence presents a classic question for the jury.
-
448 F.2d 271·
9th Cir.·
1971-08-20
·cited 16×
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to establish the appellant's knowledge of the conspiracy, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in restricting cross-examination, that prosecutorial remarks were permissible, and that the appellant lacked standing to sup
-
446 F.2d 632·
2d Cir.·
1971-06-22
·cited 16×
The dissenting judge would reverse and remand, arguing the search was unconstitutional.
-
320 F.2d 800·
D.C. Cir.·
1963-07-03
·cited 16×
The court held that while the jury instructions on insanity were not objected to and did not affect substantial rights, certain aspects warrant discussion for proper administration of the insanity defense.
-
490 F.2d 353·
9th Cir.·
1973-12-07
·cited 14×
The court affirmed the judgment, finding the search of the vehicle valid.
-
274 F.2d 863·
2d Cir.·
1960-02-17
·cited 14×
The court held that the appellant lacked standing to object to the admission of heroin seized illegally from a co-defendant's apartment, as he asserted no possessory interest in the drugs or premises.
-
460 F.2d 206·
8th Cir.·
1972-05-26
·cited 10×
The court held that additional evidence presented on remand sufficiently established probable cause for the warrantless arrest and search, justifying the reinstatement of convictions.