-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-06-17
The court ruled on various motions in limine, determining the admissibility of evidence and testimony related to a slip-and-fall incident at a Target store.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-05-24
The court held that the plaintiff's claims were either barred by Heck v. Humphrey or insufficiently pleaded, warranting dismissal.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-11
The court held that the removal was improper and the case should be remanded to state court.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-05
The court granted the motion to dismiss because the plaintiffs failed to respond, and the claims were barred by prosecutorial immunity, sovereign immunity, and lack of standing.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-02-26
The court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiff's claims were not barred by the litigation privilege and that the defendant failed to establish that a former landlord was an indispensable party whose absence warranted dismissal.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-02-22
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction over the petitioner's custodian and therefore must transfer the petition to the proper district.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-02-08
Elias Makere, an Allstate employee, filed employment discrimination claims in federal court alleging race and sex discrimination, harassment, and retaliation under Florida law and federal civil rights statutes, based on alleged mistreatment during his employment and various alleg
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-20
A prisoner who is a 'three-striker' under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) must prepay the entire filing fee unless they demonstrate imminent danger of serious physical injury.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-09
The court held that the defendants' motion to dismiss and request for judicial notice should be denied because the plaintiffs adequately pleaded a plausible claim for trademark infringement and cybersquatting.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-07
Scanz Technologies, Inc., a Canadian software company, sued competitors for allegedly stealing its trade secret scanning technology used in securities trading after their licensing agreement terminated in 2015. The court dismissed the claims against defendant Timothy Bohen due to
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-12-01
A cruise ship passenger filed a maritime negligence claim after slipping and falling on the pool deck of a Carnival ship, but the court found genuine disputes of material fact precluding summary judgment on whether the defendant knew of the dangerous condition and whether that co
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-12-01
The court held that the Governor's consent to removal was timely, and federal question jurisdiction existed, thus denying the motions to remand.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-09-30
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as moot because the petitioner has been removed from the United States, and for lack of jurisdiction regarding the request for a stay of removal.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-08-24
The court held that a successive motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 requires prior authorization from the court of appeals, and without it, the district court lacks jurisdiction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-05-18
The court held that the plaintiff failed to administratively exhaust his retaliation claim because the alleged retaliatory act occurred after his EEOC filings and was not like or related to the allegations contained therein.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-03-31
Former inmate Orvel Lloyd brought a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that sheriff's deputies violated his Fourth Amendment rights during a traffic stop, search, and arrest, and that the sheriff was liable for their conduct. The federal district court granted su
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-03-31
The Court granted the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, finding the plaintiff's claims barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel due to prior litigation.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-03-26
B&G Equipment Company sued AiroFog USA for trademark infringement and unfair competition, alleging that AiroFog's sprayer copied B&G's patented design. The parties had previously settled similar claims in 2017 through a settlement agreement, but B&G alleged that AiroFog breached
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-03-04
The court held that a request for an injunction to stay a state foreclosure sale was denied because the plaintiff failed to meet procedural requirements and demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, and because the Anti-Injunction Act barred such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-01-27
The court held that the plaintiff adequately pleaded exhaustion of administrative remedies for his FCRA claim, but failed to state a claim for negligent training, supervision, and retention because he did not identify an underlying common law tort.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-08-13
The court denied TD Bank's motion for a permanent injunction barring relitigation, finding Milano's actions not sufficiently egregious to warrant such an extraordinary remedy.
-
999 F.2d 248·
7th Cir.·
1993-07-15
The court held that the National Labor Relations Board could issue a broad cease and desist order against a labor consultant for unfair labor practices, even if the consultant had not been a respondent in prior similar cases.
-
992 F.2d 1116·
10th Cir.·
1993-05-04
The court held that an Oklahoma deferred sentence constitutes a criminal justice sentence under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(d), warranting a two-point increase in the defendant's criminal history category.
-
924 F.2d 104·
6th Cir.·
1991-01-22
The court held that the district court abused its discretion by not considering the relevant factors and precedent when granting a declaratory judgment in an insurance coverage dispute.