-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-29
In AKAI Custom Guns, LLC v. KKM Precision, Inc., a dispute over the quality of pistol barrels that KKM manufactured and sold, KKM prevailed on summary judgment and at trial on all remaining claims brought by Akai and Horowitz, including misleading advertising, violations of Flori
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-22
The Federal Trade Commission sued Start Connecting LLC and related entities for deceptively marketing fraudulent student loan debt relief services through false claims about government affiliation, guaranteed low monthly payments, advance fee requirements, and misappropriated con
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-30
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, awarding damages, costs, and prejudgment interest based on the defendants' breach of guaranty.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-17
The court entered a default judgment against one defendant for damages and interest, and specified it is joint and several with other judgments.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-06-24
The court recommended denying the motion for default judgment because entering it would risk inconsistent judgments with non-defaulting defendants whose claims are intertwined.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-16
The court granted in part and denied in part the motions to exclude expert testimony, allowing most testimony but prohibiting the use of the terms 'fraud' and 'fraudulent' by one expert.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-05
The court held that a plaintiff's initial untimeliness in providing notice for a writ of garnishment does not require dissolution of the writ if the notice defect is later cured and the defendant fails to respond.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-23
Emma Paz sued her former employer Salsas of Titusville and its owner Jesus Valencia for unpaid overtime wages and retaliatory discharge in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. After the defendants defaulted and failed to comply with court orders, the magistrate judge recomm
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-02
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, confirming the award of attorney's fees and costs against the plaintiff and his former attorney.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-31
The court denied defendants' post-trial motions, finding sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict on damages and claims of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference, and aiding and abetting.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-03-25
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to approve the settlement agreement without prejudice and entered a default against Defendant Disaster Services LLC due to its failure to comply with court orders.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2025-03-04
The Delaware Superior Court denied both parties' motions for summary judgment. The court found that the plaintiff, DNREC, failed to provide sufficient proof that a release of hazardous substances occurred, thus creating a genuine issue of material fact. The court also denied the
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-03-03
The court denied defendants' motions for a new trial and judgment as a matter of law, finding no error in the jury's verdict or the final judgment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-02-28
The court recommended denying the motion for default judgment because the complaint alleged joint liability against multiple defendants, creating a risk of inconsistent judgments.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-13
The court held that a 30% reduction in requested attorneys' fees is warranted due to vague billing entries, block billing, redundant hours, and clerical tasks, resulting in an award of $243,326.65.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-12
The court denied the motion for default judgment against LB Entertainment without prejudice, pending resolution of the claims against the other defendants.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-09
The court denied the renewed petition for fees and sanctions without prejudice, finding it deficient in multiple respects and requiring further briefing.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-11-18
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motions for default judgment against the defendants due to their failure to appear or defend.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-09-24
Environmental organizations sued HRK Holdings, LLC for unpermitted discharges under the Clean Water Act. The district court entered a default judgment against the defendant, finding 15 days of Clean Water Act violations during a 2021 discharge event and imposing a civil penalty o
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-14
Plaintiff is entitled to attorney's fees and costs from the defaulting borrowers under the loan agreement, but not from a third-party purchaser of the borrower's business.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-13
The Court granted the motion for class certification, finding the proposed class is ascertainable and meets the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a).
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2024-06-20
Publix Super Markets appealed a judgment holding it liable for a customer's slip-and-fall injury caused by yogurt that an invitee accidentally spilled while shopping. The court reversed, holding that absent actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition, a business c
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2024-06-12
K.R. appeals a restitution order imposing joint and several liability with co-defendants for a burglary victim's losses. The First District Court of Appeal reversed the portion awarding lost-wages restitution stemming from an illegal cosmetology practice, while affirming the rema
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-06-12
A woman alleged she was a victim of sex trafficking at a Choice Hotels franchised property in Orlando, Florida for approximately three months in 2013, and brought claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act against both the hotel owner/operator and the fra
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2024-06-05
A defendant is entitled to a setoff from a judgment when the plaintiff has settled with a jointly and severally liable party for the same damages, even if the settling party was not sued and the settlement was reached outside of litigation. The setoff statute applies to releases
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-05-22
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation for default judgment, but modified the proposed injunction to comply with Rule 65(d)'s specificity requirements.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-05-03
Lane Construction Corporation sued Skanska USA Civil Southeast as managing partner of a joint venture constructing Florida's massive I-4 Ultimate Project, alleging breach of fiduciary duties when Skanska rejected the termination option and pursued settlement with the state instea
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-04-05
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part and denying in part the Plaintiff's motion for relief, and entered default judgment against the Defendants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-10-25
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss all claims against the TTT Defendants without prejudice, finding no clear legal prejudice to the defendants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-21
The court requires the plaintiff to either confirm dismissal of all non-defaulted defendants or file a memorandum explaining why a default judgment can be entered despite the presence of non-defaulted defendants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-08-24
The court held that a motion for default final judgment was premature when filed against only some defendants in a case alleging joint liability and the possibility of inconsistent liability.
-
Del. Ch.·
2023-08-10
The Delaware Court of Chancery entered judgment in favor of Promise Easy on claims for violation of the Delaware Securities Act, breach of contract, and fraudulent inducement. The court found that the promissory note constituted a security, that Dr. Moon knowingly misrepresented
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision to hold GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by Florida Spine to its former counsel. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine had settled their disputes, with each party agreeing to bear its own fees, and the trial court
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision to hold GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by Florida Spine to its former attorney. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine had settled their disputes, with each party agreeing to bear its own fees, and that the trial
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision that held GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by Florida Spine to its former counsel. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine had settled their disputes, with each party agreeing to bear its own fees, and the trial cour
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's order holding GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by its former client, Florida Spine. The court found that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose liability on GEICO after the underlying cases were voluntarily dismissed with p
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision that held GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by Florida Spine to its former counsel. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine had settled their disputes, with each party agreeing to bear its own fees, and the trial cour
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision to hold GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed to Florida Spine's former counsel. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine had settled their concurrent cases with a provision that each party would bear its own fees, and the
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision to hold GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by Florida Spine to its former attorney, Robert Stein. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine's settlement agreement and voluntary dismissals of the underlying cases explicit
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision that held GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed to Florida Spine's former counsel. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine's settlement agreement and voluntary dismissals explicitly stated each party would bear its own fe
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision to hold GEICO liable for attorney's fees awarded to Florida Spine's former counsel. The court found that GEICO had settled with Florida Spine, agreeing that each party would bear its own fees, and that the trial court improper
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision that held an insurance company jointly and severally liable for attorney's fees awarded to a law firm. The court found that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose liability on the insurance company after the underlying
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision to hold GEICO liable for attorney's fees awarded to a former attorney of Florida Spine. The court found that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose liability on GEICO for fees that were to be borne by Florida Spine acco
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision that held GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by its former client, Florida Spine. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine had settled their disputes, with each party agreeing to bear their own fees, and that the trial
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision to hold GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by Florida Spine to its former attorney. The court found that the settlement agreement between GEICO and Florida Spine, which included provisions for each party to bear its own fee
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision that held GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed to Florida Spine's former counsel. The court found that the settlement agreement between GEICO and Florida Spine, which stipulated each party would bear its own fees, and the vol
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's order holding GEICO liable for attorney's fees awarded to a former attorney of Florida Spine. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine's settlement agreement and voluntary dismissals explicitly stated each party would bear its own
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision to hold GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by Florida Spine to its former attorney, Stein. The court found that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose liability on GEICO after the parties had settled their underlying
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision that held GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by Florida Spine to its former attorney. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine's settlement agreement and voluntary dismissals of the underlying cases explicitly stated ea
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-09
The appellate court reversed a trial court's decision to hold GEICO liable for attorney's fees owed by Florida Spine to its former attorney. The court found that GEICO and Florida Spine had settled their disputes, with each party agreeing to bear its own fees, and the trial court