2,256 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,513 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies and did not demonstrate a valid basis to waive the exhaustion requirement.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-01-15
Darin Engelhardt petitioned for a writ of certiorari challenging a discovery order from the trial court. The Third District Court of Appeal denied the petition, applying established standards for certiorari review of discovery orders and principles governing relevancy in discover
-
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the defendant agreed not to terminate the plaintiff's designation and the plaintiff is now compliant with fee obligations, rendering the request moot.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-07
The court denied the request for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) because the defendant had appeared and responded to the motion. The request for a preliminary injunction was taken under advisement.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to carry his burden of persuasion regarding the balance of hardships.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-01-03
The Court of Chancery denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order to retrieve his deceased horse's remains from a landfill. The court found that while it had subject matter jurisdiction under the clean-up doctrine, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-02
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, demonstrate irreparable harm without an adequate legal remedy, provide for security, a
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-01-02
Mohammed Alsaloussi and Alsaloussi Holdings, LLC appealed a trial court's order granting an emergency temporary injunction that prohibited them from liquidating, selling, or disposing of a 2018 Porsche 911 Turbo Classic pending final judgment. The appellate court affirmed the inj
-
The court granted the motion to appoint a receiver, finding that the parties' inability to agree on company operations created imminent danger of harm to the business and their interests within it.
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark and patent infringement and counterfeiting.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of her Administrative Procedure Act claim, thus denying her motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction because they failed to meet the required legal standard and procedural rules.
-
The court recommended granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding sufficient allegations for copyright and trademark infringement, and entitlement to injunctive relief and statutory damages.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order was denied because it failed to meet the required legal and procedural standards.
-
Aspire Health Partners, a nonprofit healthcare provider holding trademark registrations for "ASPIRE HEALTH PARTNERS," "ASPIRE HEALTH," and "ASPIRE," sought a preliminary injunction against Aspire MGT LLC, a nursing home operator using the similar mark "ASPIRE HEALTH GROUP" on its
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's design patent and ordering various third parties to assist in enforcing the injunction.
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2024-12-06
Sandra Katherine Smith-Fullerton petitioned for a writ of certiorari to quash the trial court's order requiring full financial disclosure in her divorce proceedings. The appellate court granted the petition because the trial court failed to first determine the validity of the par
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2024-12-04
Baptist Hospital of Miami sought a writ of certiorari to review a trial court order excluding evidence. The appellate court dismissed the petition, holding that exclusion of evidence in civil cases does not constitute irreparable harm because any error can be corrected on appeal
-
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding that Plaintiff sufficiently pleaded its claims and is entitled to injunctive relief and statutory damages.
-
The court denied the ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient justification for proceeding without notice to the defendant.
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a strong likelihood of success on the merits of trademark and patent infringement claims.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's patent and ordering various third parties to disable infringing operations and provide discovery.
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining Defendants from infringing on Plaintiff's design patents and ordering the preservation and restraint of assets.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-19
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against defendants for copyright infringement, trademark counterfeiting, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.
-
The court recommended granting the motion to quash service because service was improper under federal and state rules, and denying the motion for a cease-and-desist order because the plaintiff failed to establish the elements for injunctive relief.
-
The court granted plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding that the defaulting defendants infringed plaintiff's patent and were liable for damages and injunctive relief.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2024-11-15
Former employees of Hydrologic Distribution Company appeal a trial court's grant of a temporary injunction preventing them from competing with their former employer and soliciting its customers and employees. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Hydrologic established legit
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a plausible claim for false arrest or denial of medical care, and also failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief.
-
The court denied the motion to stay enforcement of the bill of costs because the movant failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on appeal or irreparable injury.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's patent and copyright.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-11-08
The court recommended granting a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2024-10-30
Blue Condominium Association appeals a judgment awarding Blue Grouper Ventures damages and a permanent injunction for breach of the Declaration and trespass. The appellate court affirmed the underlying judgment but reversed the award of prejudgment interest from 2014 and the perm
-
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and a substantial threat of irreparable injury.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-10-22
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, awarding injunctive relief and statutory damages for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-10-22
The court recommends granting the motion to dismiss because the complaint is an impermissible shotgun pleading, failing to provide adequate notice of the claims against each defendant.
-
The court held that the state's actions in threatening broadcasters with prosecution for airing a political advertisement constituted unconstitutional coercion and viewpoint discrimination, violating the First Amendment.
-
University of Miami sued CANEUP LLC for trademark infringement based on the defendant's use of the "CANEUP" mark on clothing and apparel, alleging it was confusingly similar to the university's long-established "CANES" and orange-and-green "U" design marks. The court granted defa
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-10-09
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding Defendants liable for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm if relief is not granted.
-
The court granted Plaintiff's ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, finding a strong probability of success on the merits of copyright and trade dress infringement claims and the likelihood of irreparable harm.
-
The court recommended denying the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, or that the threatened injury outweighed the harm to the defendant, and that the relief woul
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-09-30
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment against Defendant.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-09-29
The Court affirmed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and overruling Defendant's objections.
-
The court recommended granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis for copyright infringement liability and injunctive relief, but requiring further inquiry into damages.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-09-23
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary injunction because it failed to comply with procedural rules and substantive requirements.
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for default final judgment against defendants who counterfeited and infringed its trademark, awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2024-09-18
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing claims against certain defendants for improper joinder, recommending remand.