2,255 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,513 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
992 F.2d 430·
2d Cir.·
1993-04-28
·cited 1×
A status quo injunction pending arbitration, when based on a contract's status quo provision, must be analyzed under specific performance principles, not preliminary injunction standards.
-
977 F.2d 86·
3d Cir.·
1992-10-13
·cited 1×
The court held that Campbell failed to make a clear showing of immediate irreparable harm, which is required for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court held that the appellants were likely to prevail on the merits of their appeal because the mandatory application of 11 U.S.C. § 109(g)(2) was not warranted by the facts, and therefore granted their motion for a stay pending appeal.
-
The court granted plaintiffs' request for supplemental findings regarding the APA and granted a limited injunction for First Amendment access, while denying other injunctive relief.
-
The District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted preliminary injunctive relief to the Haitian Refugee Center (HRC) and individual Haitian plaintiffs challenging the U.S. government's forced repatriation of Haitians interdicted at sea without adequate procedural saf
-
924 F.2d 98·
6th Cir.·
1991-01-22
·cited 1×
The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate irreparable harm and that the issue of injunctive relief under Rule 65 is governed by federal procedural law.
-
909 F.2d 59·
2d Cir.·
1990-07-13
·cited 1×
The court held that a preliminary injunction was improperly granted because the plaintiff's oral dealership agreement claim is likely barred by the New York statute of frauds due to inconsistent representations about its duration.
-
889 F.2d 1327·
4th Cir.·
1989-11-22
·cited 1×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction to prevent Singer from dissipating assets and in denying Singer's motion to approve certain transactions.
-
The court held that the plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of prevailing on its due process claim and equitable estoppel claim, justifying a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the zoning ordinance as interpreted.
-
712 F. Supp. 176·
S.D. Fla.·
1988-09-21
·cited 1×
The court held that the developer's denial of access to a franchised cable company to install its system in public rights-of-way and easements was an attempt to prevent competition and was unenforceable under the Cable Act.
-
676 F. Supp. 244·
S.D. Fla.·
1988-01-08
·cited 1×
The court denied the application for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiffs failed to establish entitlement to such relief.
-
622 F. Supp. 201·
S.D. Fla.·
1985-11-13
·cited 1×
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the necessary elements for a preliminary injunction, specifically a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
The court held that plaintiffs were entitled to due process, including notice and a hearing, before the USDA could implement emergency interim regulations allowing the importation of Persian limes from Mexico, as their property interests were at stake.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of prevailing on its federal preemption claim, thus denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
665 F.2d 395·
1st Cir.·
1981-11-12
·cited 1×
A federal court injunction to compel a state court to conduct proceedings in English is barred by the Younger doctrine, absent compelling circumstances and a showing of irreparable harm.
-
-
Langley appeals a final injunction prohibiting him from operating taxicabs in Jacksonville except for casual, incidental, and fortuitous operations. The court affirms the injunction, finding that Langley's operation was designed and executed as a subterfuge to avoid city taxicab
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2026-09-02
A trial court violates a party's due process rights when it imposes sanctions sua sponte without proper notice and an opportunity to be heard.
-
The district court lacked authority to issue a universal injunction against enforcement of Florida's Protection of Children Act because universal injunctions exceed a federal court's equitable authority under the Judiciary Act, as established in Trump v. CASA, Inc., and no except
-
A childcare provider dismissed from a state voucher program for failing to comply with an on-site audit is not entitled to a pre-deprivation hearing under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Under the Mathews v. Eldridge balancing test, the provider's private inte
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2026-05-08
A court-appointed psychologist is afforded absolute immunity from negligence claims arising from his preparation of a parenting plan recommendation during a divorce custody proceeding, as the litigation privilege protects any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceedi
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2026-03-25
The Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida dismissed an appeal of a partial final judgment, finding it premature because interdependent claims remained unresolved. However, the court granted a petition for writ of certiorari to address the immediate execution of the judgment,
-
Fla. 6th DCA·
2026-03-20
The Sixth District Court of Appeal dismissed a petition for writ of certiorari challenging a discovery-related order, holding that the petitioners failed to establish irreparable harm—a jurisdictional requirement for the extraordinary remedy of certiorari.
-
Fla. 6th DCA·
2026-03-17
Roger Salazar petitioned for a writ of certiorari to quash a trial court's order granting partition and ordering the sale of a jointly owned home. The appellate court granted the petition, finding the trial court departed from essential requirements of law by granting judgment of
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2026-03-11
DigitalBridge Partners sought certiorari review of a trial court's denial of their motion to stay proceedings in a Palm Beach County action pending resolution of a related, first-filed action in Miami-Dade County involving the same Software Development Agreement. The Florida Four
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2026-03-06
The NCAA appeals a trial court's issuance of a temporary injunction requiring it to grant Doctor Bradley eligibility to compete in college basketball for the 2025-2026 season, waiving the NCAA's Five-Year Rule. The appellate court quashes the injunction, finding the trial court's
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2026-03-06
A father sought certiorari review of a circuit court order denying his motion for reunification with his dependent child. The appellate court granted the petition and quashed the order, finding that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to m
-
Jill Pardes Wolfson was held in civil contempt for discovery violations and failure to pay court-ordered fees, with immediate incarceration ordered. The appellate court quashed the order because it lacked required findings about Jill's present ability to purge the contempt and fa
-
NEC Fund VI, a lender to Hecate Holdings, seeks a preliminary injunction to recover $75 million in settlement proceeds from Hecate's settlement with Repsol over a put option dispute. Although the court found NEC likely to succeed on breach of contract claims, it denied the prelim
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2026-02-25
A petition for certiorari review was dismissed for failure to demonstrate irreparable harm, which is a condition precedent for invoking district court certiorari jurisdiction. The court reaffirmed that harm must be of an irreparable nature and not remediable on appeal from a fina
-
The court granted plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement and a high probability of irreparable harm.
-
The court granted plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from using the ACDANC trademark on infringing products and ordering asset freezes.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from using the plaintiff's trademark and freezing their assets.
-
Del. Ch.·
2026-01-21
MyCarrier seeks attorneys' fees as the prevailing party after the court denied Project 44's motion for preliminary injunction. The court stayed the fee award pending final resolution of the underlying breach of contract dispute in arbitration, finding substantial overlap between
-
The court granted the plaintiff's ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, enjoining defendants from using the plaintiff's trademark and restraining their assets.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-12
A plaintiff must demonstrate irreparable harm to obtain a preliminary injunction, and a mere showing of a constitutional violation, or speculative harm to principals, or the potential for later corrective action, does not meet this standard.
-
11th Cir.·
2026-01-09
Four nonresident activists challenged Atlanta's requirement that signature gatherers on local referendum petitions be city residents, claiming it violated their First Amendment rights, and the district court granted their preliminary injunction. The Eleventh Circuit reversed, hol
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-09
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because the alleged harm was not actual or imminent, and the motion was procedurally deficient.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm.
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order, enjoining Customs and Border Protection from releasing disputed cargo to anyone but the plaintiff.
-
The court held that the movant failed to establish a substantial likelihood of irreparable injury, a necessary prerequisite for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court granted in part and denied in part the petitioner's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order, enjoining respondents from removing the petitioner from the district but denying the request to enjoin her ongoing detention.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-05
The court granted in part and denied in part motions to strike affirmative defenses, treating some as denials, striking others as improper defenses, and allowing some to proceed.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction, finding he failed to establish the necessary elements for such relief.
-
Plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction are denied because she failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis for trademark infringement and related claims and recommending injunctive relief and statutory damages.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-16
The court granted the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for breach of contract and irreparable harm.
-
The Eleventh Circuit denied the prisoner's motion for a stay of execution, finding that his significant delay in bringing his Eighth Amendment challenge to the lethal injection protocol was fatal to his request for equitable relief.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and evidence to establish the defendants' liability for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.