207 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 489 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
A guilty plea induced by a coerced confession is invalid, and the petitioner is entitled to a hearing on whether his plea was voluntary.
-
348 F.2d 22·
3d Cir.·
1965-06-30
·cited 48×
The court held that the petitioner's confession was admissible, as it was not tainted by an alleged illegal arrest and was made voluntarily despite the circumstances. The court also held that evidence obtained from a warrantless search was inadmissible under Mapp v. Ohio, but Map
-
Joyce Hawthorne appealed her second-degree murder conviction for shooting her husband, arguing several trial errors including improper impeachment using prior testimony derived from illegally obtained statements, exclusion of evidence about the victim's violence, exclusion of bat
-
The dissenting judge argues that the Mapp v. Ohio decision, establishing the exclusionary rule for illegally seized evidence, should apply retroactively to convictions predating the decision, as it declares a fundamental constitutional right.
-
A motion to vacate a conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is not available for errors that could have been raised on direct appeal, such as the admission of evidence obtained through illegal detention or identification procedures, absent specific circumstances like lack of counsel o
-
The court held that the defendant's confession was obtained in violation of his Miranda rights because the FBI agents continued to interrogate him after he made an equivocal request for an attorney. Therefore, the confession should not have been admitted at trial.
-
The court held that a guilty plea induced by threats against a third party is not an absolute bar to challenging the plea's voluntariness, and a remand for an evidentiary hearing is necessary if the state did not have probable cause for the threats.
-
Frederick Deiterle was convicted of unlawful homicide in the death of Ollie Glass. The Florida Supreme Court reversed his conviction, finding that his oral confessions were obtained through coercive interrogation in violation of constitutional principles, and that the written sta
-
983 So. 2d 443·
Fla.·
2008-02-07
·cited 42×
Samuel Jason Derrick was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death for the 1987 killing of Rama Sharma. In this postconviction proceeding, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Derrick's rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief and rejected his petitio
-
466 F.2d 939·
7th Cir.·
1972-03-29
·cited 42×
The court held that while a plaintiff cannot recover damages for conviction and incarceration resulting from an improperly admitted involuntary confession, they may still pursue a claim for harm suffered due to the unlawful interrogation itself.
-
The court held that the District Court correctly denied the habeas corpus petition without an evidentiary hearing and that the Boykin doctrine should not be applied retroactively.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983 and 1985 were not barred by the Illinois statute of limitations and that sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict.
-
The court held that the petitioner's claims of coerced confessions and incompetent counsel did not violate his federal constitutional rights, and therefore, the District Court properly dismissed his habeas corpus petition.
-
658 F.2d 1332·
9th Cir.·
1981-10-13
·cited 41×
A confession is involuntary if obtained through psychological coercion, such as threats that a mother will not see her child for a long time if she does not cooperate.
-
The court held that the admission of a confession obtained shortly after the use of force, and the prejudicial effect of a co-defendant's guilty plea before the jury, constituted plain error requiring a new trial for housebreaking and larceny charges.
-
The court held that the trial court did not err in denying severance, restricting cross-examination, excluding evidence, or in its jury instructions, and that confessions were admissible or rendered harmless by subsequent testimony. The judgments of conviction for first-degree mu
-
424 F.2d 1181·
8th Cir.·
1970-04-20
·cited 40×
A guilty plea induced by government promises or threats, even if not disclosed to the court, is void if the inducement was the sole basis for the plea. The government's silence when a defendant falsely denies inducements constitutes a fraud on the court.
-
A federal district court has the authority to hold hearings and make independent factual determinations in a habeas corpus proceeding, even if the issue was previously litigated in state court, particularly when the claim involves physical coercion rendering a confession involunt
-
Confessions obtained through prolonged interrogation, incommunicado detention, and deceptive tactics are inadmissible as violating due process.
-
David James Martin was convicted of first-degree murder and armed robbery in the death of Jacey McWilliams, and sentenced to death. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed his convictions and death sentence, finding that his confession was voluntary despite challenging interrogation t
-
793 F.2d 621·
5th Cir.·
1986-06-27
·cited 38×
The court held that the Mississippi Supreme Court's procedural bar was not adequate and independent, allowing federal review of the Eighth Amendment claim, and that the petitioner was competent to stand trial.
-
The court held that the district court erred in striking allegations and refusing evidence regarding the plaintiff's involuntary confession and illegal detention, and in refusing several jury instructions. However, the dismissal of the City of Chicago was affirmed.
-
The dissenting opinion argues that voluntary guilty pleas, entered on advice of counsel, waive all prior non-jurisdictional defects. It contends that the Supreme Court's decision in Jackson v. Denno, which requires hearings on the voluntariness of confessions used at trial, shoul
-
The court held that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence or in its jury instructions, and that the grand jury proceedings were not sufficiently tainted to warrant dismissal of the indictment.
-
420 So. 2d 574·
Fla.·
1982-09-02
·cited 36×
Anderson appealed his conviction and death sentence for first-degree murder in Florida. The Florida Supreme Court vacated both the adjudication and sentence, holding that statements Anderson made to deputies violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and that his February stat
-
527 F.2d 430·
5th Cir.·
1976-02-20
·cited 36×
-
The court held that the district court's failure to instruct the jury on the voluntariness of the defendant's confession, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3501(a), constituted plain error requiring a new trial.
-
294 So. 2d 54·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1974-05-01
·cited 36×
Florida appeals a trial court's suppression of the defendant's confessions to murder and assault. The court affirmed the suppression, finding the confessions involuntary based on police coercion, false promises of release, threats regarding child custody, and the defendant's ment
-
A counseled guilty plea, even if motivated by a potentially coerced confession, is valid against collateral attack if the defendant cannot prove gross error by counsel.
-
411 F.2d 216·
3d Cir.·
1969-04-30
·cited 36×
The court held that exceptional circumstances, including significant delay and prior federal court involvement, warranted the District Court deciding the voluntariness of the petitioner's confessions, despite the general rule of exhausting state remedies.
-
394 F.2d 492·
5th Cir.·
1968-05-17
·cited 36×
The court held that the district court did not err in denying habeas corpus relief without a hearing because the petitioner's guilty plea was voluntary and the sentences were concurrent.
-
A voluntary guilty plea, entered on advice of counsel, waives all non-jurisdictional defects in prior proceedings.
-
The court held that the Deegans' testimony, despite being obtained through questionable government tactics, was admissible and sufficient to support Weinstein's conviction on Count VI.
-
561 So. 2d 278·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1990-01-05
·cited 35×
The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's suppression of Tom Sawyer's confession in a capital murder case, instead affirming the suppression order due to coercive interrogation techniques, Miranda violations, and psychological coercion during a 16-hour polic
-
Hamilton was convicted of lewd and indecent fondling of a 12-year-old child in violation of Florida law. On appeal, he challenged the trial judge's reference to his written statement as a 'confession' when the State conceded it was not a confession, arguing this constituted funda
-
The Florida Supreme Court granted petitioners' request for leave to file a writ of error coram nobis in a capital murder case, allowing the trial court to examine allegations of coerced confessions, inadequate counsel, and threats of lynching that allegedly rendered their convict
-
Robert Joe Long appeals his guilty pleas to multiple first-degree murders and a death sentence in Hillsborough County. The Florida Supreme Court upholds the validity of Long's guilty pleas and affirms his convictions and life sentences, but vacates and remands the death sentence
-
The court held that the government can use a criminal defendant's statements made in a pre-trial bail hearing to prove guilt at trial, contrary to established precedent.
-
The court held that the City's petition for rehearing was denied because the prior decision correctly applied New York law regarding 'undue means' in malicious prosecution claims.
-
The court held that the joinder of unconstitutional charges with a valid charge did not substantially prejudice the defendant's right to a fair trial on the valid charge, nor did it rebut the presumption of validity for the general sentence.
-
250 So. 2d 888·
Fla.·
1971-07-07
·cited 34×
The Florida Supreme Court granted certiorari in two consolidated murder cases and reversed the convictions of Billy Ray Oliver and James Colbert for the arson-caused death of Travis Earl Crow III, finding that law enforcement's failure to bring the defendants before a magistrate
-
The court held that the prosecution bears the burden of proving a guilty plea's voluntariness when a coerced confession may have influenced it.
-
177 So. 2d 715·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1965-07-27
·cited 34×
The court reviewed the summary denial of a petition for relief filed under Criminal Procedure Rule One, which alleged denial of counsel's preparation time and an involuntary confession.
-
-
The court held that the confessions were coerced and involuntary as a matter of law due to the totality of the circumstances, violating the defendant's constitutional rights.
-
The court held that the delay in bringing the defendants to trial did not violate the Speedy Trial Clause and that their confessions were not coerced.
-
A state prisoner alleging denial of effective assistance of counsel due to a coerced confession and inadequate legal representation is entitled to a federal habeas corpus hearing.
-
The court denied the motion to appeal in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, finding it without merit and not taken in good faith.
-
Lawrence Lawton was convicted of embezzlement on one count and sentenced to two years. The Florida Supreme Court reversed and awarded a new trial, finding that the confession was involuntarily obtained through promises and hope of avoiding prosecution, and that admission of a civ
-
K. C. Sinclair appeals his conviction for breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny after pleading guilty and being sentenced to five years hard labor. He sought to withdraw his plea, claiming he was beaten by a deputy sheriff, threatened into confessing, and deni