Intent To Injure Or Defraud

62 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• United States v. Brennan
  994 F.2d 918· 1st Cir.· 1993-06-03 ·cited 2×
  The court affirmed the convictions, finding sufficient evidence and no reversible error in the trial court's decisions regarding evidence, jury instructions, or procedural matters.
• United States v. Haddock
  961 F.2d 933· 10th Cir.· 1992-05-15 ·cited 2×
  The court held that evidence presented regarding the defendant's actions was sufficient to warrant a reasonable jury's finding that he willfully misapplied bank funds with the intent to injure or defraud the bank, despite the check being written on an account with insufficient fu
• Gadson v. State
  451 So. 2d 992· Fla. 5th DCA· 1984-06-14 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the state failed to prove the element of intent to injure or defraud, which is essential for a forgery conviction.
• United States v. Di Genova
  134 F.2d 466· 3d Cir.· 1943-03-24 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the trial judge erred by submitting an uncharged offense to the jury and by abdicating his judicial responsibility to direct a verdict when the evidence did not support the charges.
• Edwards v. State
  45 Fla. 22· Fla.· 1903-01-01 ·cited 2×
  The Florida Supreme Court reversed a conviction for obtaining money by false pretenses. The court found that the evidence did not sufficiently prove the intent to defraud required by the statute, as the defendant's failure to work for the lender was due to interference from a for
• State v. Carrier
  Fla. 2d DCA· 2018-03-09
  Section 585.145(3) is not unconstitutionally vague on its face and does not violate substantive due process. The statute requires a knowing alteration of a certificate that results in a false or deceptive document, and when construed in context with the words 'forges,' 'counterfe
• Lewis v. State
  152 So. 3d 845· Fla. 1st DCA· 2014-12-16
  The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed Tabitha Lewis' forgery conviction, holding that the state failed to present sufficient evidence of intent to injure or defraud as required by the forgery statute. Lewis had created a forged court order granting her custody of her chil
• United States v. Bowen
  946 F.2d 734· 10th Cir.· 1991-10-08
  The court held that the district court did not err in proceeding to trial on the first superseding indictment, denying severance of counts, admitting evidence of loss, or handling the disclosure of a witness's file, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions.
• Lennie Elizabeth Pate v. State
  256 So. 2d 223· Fla. 1st DCA· 1972-01-06
  Lennie Elizabeth Pate was convicted of uttering and publishing a forged will under Florida law and sentenced to ten years imprisonment. The appellate court reversed and remanded for a new trial, finding that the state failed to establish a prima facie case due to insufficient pro
• Daniel v. State
  95 Fla. 506· Fla.· 1928-03-17
  The Florida Supreme Court reversed a conviction for making a false bank entry, holding that the indictment failed to charge a crime. The court found that reporting overdrafts as a lesser amount than shown in the bank's books, when those overdrafts were still considered assets, di