Intent To Commit A Felony

164 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Thomas v. State
  314 So. 2d 216· Fla. 1st DCA· 1975-06-24
• Rivers v. State
  307 So. 2d 826· Fla. 1st DCA· 1975-01-14
  Rivers was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny. The appellate court affirmed, holding that evidence of the burglary, prying tool, and jimmied deposit box containing over $3,300 sufficiently established intent to steal more than $100, and that tr
• Harrell v. State
  302 So. 2d 152· Fla. 1st DCA· 1974-10-24
• Wright v. State
  294 So. 2d 48· Fla. 1st DCA· 1974-05-07
  Wright and McCoy appealed their convictions for breaking and entering a Burger King with intent to commit grand larceny. The court reversed the Burger King conviction due to insufficient evidence of the value element required for grand larceny, but remanded for conviction on the
• Williams v. Wainwright
  278 So. 2d 641· Fla. 4th DCA· 1973-06-06
  The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to support a charge of breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny.
• Honeywood v. State
  247 So. 2d 22· Fla. 2d DCA· 1971-04-14
  Wesley Honeywood appeals his conviction for breaking and entering an office building with intent to commit felony grand larceny. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, holding that the evidence of breaking was sufficient because the defendants forced open a closed window an
• Smith v. State
  241 So. 2d 739· Fla. 1st DCA· 1970-12-10
• Little v. State
  239 So. 2d 49· Fla. 1st DCA· 1970-08-20
  The court affirmed convictions for breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny, holding that a stolen calendar was properly admitted as evidence and legally seized from an abandoned automobile.
• Lindsey v. State
  230 So. 2d 689· Fla. 2d DCA· 1970-01-21
  Frank Lindsey appealed his conviction for breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny, challenging the sufficiency of the information charging him and the trial judge's failure to explicitly instruct the jury they could return a not guilty verdict. The appellate court aff
• Young v. State
  160 So. 2d 719· Fla. 3d DCA· 1964-02-04
  Robert Young was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor after being found inside a laundromat in the early morning hours. Young appealed arguing the trial court erred in allowing the state to reopen its case to establish ownership of the premises a
• Barber v. Cochran
  126 So. 2d 738· Fla.· 1961-02-08
  The Florida Supreme Court discharged a writ of habeas corpus for a petitioner who falsely claimed he was entitled to release because his sentence exceeded the maximum penalty for his crime. The court found the petitioner was actually charged with a more serious offense with a hig
• de Marios v. State
  101 So. 2d 835· Fla. 3d DCA· 1958-03-18
  The appellate court affirmed a conviction for breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny, finding no merit in the appellant's eight points of error.
• Hancock v. State
  79 Fla. 701· Fla.· 1920-05-05
  This case reviews a conviction for grand larceny. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, holding that an indictment charging both burglary and larceny in separate counts, arising from the same transaction, is not duplicitous and is permissible.