-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-24
The court held that Count I of the Second Amended Complaint fails to state a claim because the dispute resolution provision for the Earnout Payment calculation, specifically the Neutral Auditor clause, is enforceable under Delaware law and requires the dispute to be resolved by t
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-10-23
The court held that the defendant failed to establish that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000, as the defendant's own attorney's fees incurred in litigating the fee dispute could not be counted towards the amount in controversy from the plaintiff's perspective. Therefore,
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-10-20
The court recommended issuing a new temporary restraining order (TRO) and continuing efforts to serve the Respondent, acknowledging the need for expeditious resolution in child custody matters.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-17
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order because they failed to meet the required legal standards.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-15
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-10-14
Pro se plaintiffs filed suit against federal and state officials claiming that the federal government violated the Guarantee Clause by failing to recognize Indigenous Americans as sovereign and that the Fourteenth Amendment's birthright citizenship has been improperly extended to
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-30
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, denying Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Count II, and denying Defendant's motion as to Count III.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-30
The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding the Defendant liable for trademark infringement and counterfeiting and awarding injunctive relief and statutory damages.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-23
The court held that the pro se prisoner's complaint was procedurally deficient and dismissed it without prejudice, but granted the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and allowed an opportunity to amend.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-22
The court held that Florida's litigation privilege bars state law claims, but the good faith reliance defense does not warrant dismissal of federal ECPA and SCA claims at the pleading stage. The court dismissed the ECPA claims for failure to adequately plead contemporaneous inter
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-22
The court held that a prisoner's transfer moots her claim for injunctive relief related to the prior institution.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-19
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against the remaining defendants for trademark and design patent infringement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-18
The court held that Franklin Electric sufficiently alleged a claim under Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) for fraudulent inducement related to a business acquisition discussion.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-15
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding that the plaintiff sufficiently alleged claims for trademark counterfeiting, false designation of origin, cybersquatting, and common law unfair competition and infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-13
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding that the well-pleaded allegations sufficiently established liability for trademark counterfeiting, infringement, false designation of origin, cybersquatting, and unfair competition.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-04
Benessere Investment Group and ARC Global Investments II sued Eric Swider, Alexander Cano, and Renatus Advisors for hacking into their computer systems and misappropriating confidential information about DWAC (a SPAC merging with Trump Media), which Swider allegedly used to orche
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-28
Shareholders David Peyton and David Martinez failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that they are one-third owners of Nexxt Gen Corporation and related companies, or that they are equal one-third partners in a joint venture with Eric Grant providing network, communica
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2025-08-27
The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a homeowners association's right to obtain injunctive relief against homeowners for violating restrictive covenants regarding lawn maintenance, holding that an association is not required to prove irreparable harm or lack of adequate r
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-26
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish standing for injunctive relief and that the complaint constituted a shotgun pleading, but denied dismissal based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2025-08-25
The Court granted the motion to dismiss, finding that the petition for a writ of mandamus sought an equitable remedy outside the Superior Court's authority and that, consequently, the request for a declaratory judgment, even if justiciable, would not serve judicial economy. The C
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-22
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and that amendment would be futile.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-21
A complaint that fails to separate claims, incorporates all prior allegations into each count, or includes irrelevant facts constitutes an impermissible shotgun pleading and must be stricken.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-21
Nihal Michael Gautam sued the City of Sunrise and multiple police officers under federal civil rights laws and state law, alleging false arrest, excessive force, failure to intervene, municipal liability, civil RICO violations, and violations of Florida's Public Records Act stemm
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-08-21
The court held that the arbitration clause in the settlement agreement applies to the claims in this action, including those against new defendants, and therefore proceedings in this court must be stayed.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-08-21
The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order must be denied if it seeks relief for events not at issue in the complaint and against parties not named in the litigation.
-
11th Cir.·
2025-08-20
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint because, when viewed favorably to the plaintiffs, the allegations did not establish that they were similar to historical analogues like felons or dangerous individuals, failing the government's burden to jus
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-19
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint must be dismissed without prejudice due to failure to serve the defendants within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-18
The court held that the Fifth Amendment due process claim is dismissed, the Fourteenth Amendment due process claim is dismissed due to adequate state remedies, and the First Amendment retaliation claim is dismissed for failure to plead absence of probable cause.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2025-08-14
The court awarded Plaintiff BDO USA, P.C. $1,920,000 in damages, plus post-judgment interest. The court denied Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff was awarded $640,000 in direct costs incurred for remediation efforts, whic
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-08
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages, attorneys' fees, costs, and a permanent injunction for copyright infringement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-08
The court held that Judge Fritton is entitled to absolute judicial immunity, and other claims are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, declining to intervene in ongoing state proceedings.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-08
The court recommended granting default judgment against the defendant for copyright infringement, awarding statutory damages, attorneys' fees, costs, and injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-06
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint failed to comply with federal pleading standards and lacked subject matter jurisdiction, warranting dismissal without prejudice.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-08-06
The court held that the parties' dispute over Bunting Macks' exercise of self-help rights under the REA must be arbitrated. The court found that Horton's objection to the size of the forcemain Bunting Macks intended to install fell within the narrow arbitration provision of Secti
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-31
The court granted the motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a seizure for malicious prosecution, that punitive damages were unavailable against the City, that injunctive relief was moot, and that the officer was protected by qualified immunity.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-31
The court held that the plaintiff's official-capacity claims were dismissed, but his individual-capacity failure-to-protect claims under the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as his requests for declaratory and injunctive relief, were sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-30
The court held that the defendant failed to establish the amount in controversy required for federal jurisdiction, thus the case must be remanded.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-30
The federal court denied Plaintiff's emergency motions because it likely lacks jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to review or enjoin a state court foreclosure sale and judgment.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-22
A federal court cannot enjoin state court proceedings under the Anti-Injunction Act unless an exception applies, and principles of comity and federalism require respect for state judicial systems.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-22
The court held that the prisoner's pro se civil rights complaint was deficient for failing to use the required form, pay the filing fee, or move to proceed in forma pauperis, and for failing to meet the requirements for a temporary restraining order.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-21
The court denied the motion for an order to show cause for civil contempt because the underlying order was not clear and unambiguous. The parties subsequently agreed to specific actions to clarify compliance.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-07-18
The Court of Chancery granted Elon Musk's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and granted the other defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The court found that the plaintiff lacked standing to assert contract claims under the merger agreement
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-15
The court denied the plaintiff's various motions, including requests for preservation orders, extended service deadlines, early discovery, disqualification of a state judge, and leave to amend the complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-14
The court held that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because the IRS's decertification of the tax debt rendered the case moot, as there was no longer an actual or justiciable controversy.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-14
The court granted plaintiffs' renewed motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis in the pleadings and evidence for liability and awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-11
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis for claims under the ADA, FHA, and Florida Fair Housing Act, but denied compensatory and punitive damages due to lack of evidence.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-10
The court held that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants for all of the plaintiff's claims and that venue was improper in the Middle District of Florida.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-03
The court held that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because the Medicare Act requires claims to be channeled through administrative review processes, and no exception applied.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-07-03
The Court held that the easement at issue is an express easement, not an easement by necessity, and therefore it is not extinguished by the existence of an alternative means of access. The court granted the Defendant's request for quiet title in the easement and denied the reques
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-02
The court held that the defendants failed to meet their burden of proving fraudulent joinder, and therefore, the case must be remanded to state court.