-
583 F.2d 1325·
5th Cir.·
1978-11-15
·cited 89×
-
104 So. 2d 642·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1958-08-01
·cited 87×
Renpak, a wholesaler of hotel supplies, sought injunctive relief against former officers and employees who formed a competing business. The court affirmed the chancellor's dismissal, holding that absent a non-compete agreement, trade secret misappropriation, or unfair competition
-
761 So. 2d 1256·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2000-07-19
·cited 49×
Millennium Communications and Advanced Marketing challenged a temporary injunction under Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) for marketing Continental's Advantage credit card program to out-of-state consumers. The appellate court reversed the injunction, h
-
676 F.2d 1211·
8th Cir.·
1982-05-05
·cited 36×
The court held that prison officials are entitled to broad discretion in matters of prison security and administration, and injunctions should not be imposed without a clear showing of constitutional deprivation or a real and immediate threat thereof.
-
383 So. 2d 705·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1980-04-30
·cited 33×
Court denied Cooper Village's petition for common law certiorari challenging the circuit court's refusal to discharge a notice of lis pendens, finding no departure from essential legal requirements.
-
219 So. 3d 218·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2017-05-16
·cited 24×
The court held that the petition for certiorari must be dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the trial court's order denying the motion to dissolve the lis pendens caused irreparable harm that cannot be corrected on appeal.
-
929 F.2d 618·
11th Cir.·
1991-04-23
·cited 23×
The law of the case doctrine does not preclude the district court from considering the abstention doctrine when the issue was not explicitly decided or implicitly resolved in prior appellate proceedings.
-
728 F.2d 560·
1st Cir.·
1984-02-29
·cited 16×
The court held that the district court did not err in denying injunctive relief for general population inmates and in finding that the revised protective custody criteria did not unreasonably expose inmates to violence.
-
711 F.2d 910·
9th Cir.·
1983-07-29
·cited 10×
The court held that while the termination assessment was invalid due to the IRS's failure to issue a timely notice of deficiency, injunctive relief was not automatically granted and required a showing of irreparable harm and lack of adequate legal remedy.
-
595 F.2d 1043·
5th Cir.·
1979-05-23
·cited 10×
The court held that a plaintiff must show a job vacancy existed at the time of application to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination under the ADEA.
-
203 F.2d 477·
6th Cir.·
1953-04-15
·cited 10×
The court held that the complaint failed to allege sufficient extraordinary and exceptional circumstances to justify an injunction against the collection of assessed income tax deficiencies.
-
234 F.3d 1130·
11th Cir.·
2000-11-17
·cited 6×
Registered voters in Florida challenged the constitutionality of Florida Statute § 102.166(4) governing manual ballot recounts during the 2000 presidential election recount, seeking an injunction to prevent manual recounts and certification of results containing recounts. The Ele
-
324 So. 3d 947·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2021-06-02
·cited 5×
A state trial court has subject matter jurisdiction over state law claims arising from a patent licensing dispute when the patent issues necessarily raised by those claims are not substantial in the relevant sense under the Gunn v. Minton four-part test, even though patent law is
-
117 So. 3d 811·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2013-06-26
·cited 4×
The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's denial of temporary reinstatement under Florida's Whistle-blower's Act, holding that the trial court improperly required the plaintiff to meet the evidentiary standards for injunctive relief rather than the specific sta
-
710 F. Supp. 2d 1274·
M.D. Fla.·
2010-09-01
·cited 4×
An 'obey-the-law' injunction is unenforceable and violates Rule 65(d), constitutional rights, and separation of powers, and thus cannot be issued in an SEC enforcement action.
-
864 F. Supp. 1201·
S.D. Fla.·
1994-07-19
·cited 4×
The court held that the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) likely violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act by intending to provide mental health services to deaf individuals through interpreters, rather than counselors with
-
582 So. 2d 1221·
Fla. 5th DCA·
1991-06-27
·cited 4×
The Perlinis owned a 25-acre parcel adjacent to Seminole Woods subdivision and used the subdivision's private roads to access their property after purchasing lot 25 within the subdivision. The appellate court reversed the trial court's injunction prohibiting the Perlinis from dri
-
444 F.2d 391·
2d Cir.·
1971-06-18
·cited 4×
The court held that the plaintiff's claims were premature and speculative, lacking a genuine issue of material fact to warrant injunctive relief.
-
161 F.2d 380·
D.C. Cir.·
1947-04-28
·cited 4×
The court held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act applies to cases involving labor disputes, regardless of the perceived legitimacy of the objectives or the legality of the conduct.
-
413 So. 3d 211·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2025-04-23
·cited 1×
A trial court errs in granting a preliminary injunction without including factual findings in support thereof and without addressing the bond requirement, conducting an evidentiary hearing thereon, or explaining reasons for waiving the bond.
-
435 F. Supp. 2d 1206·
S.D. Fla.·
2006-06-20
·cited 1×
The court held that claims under the VRA and NVRA regarding voter registration form requirements fail to state a claim, and constitutional claims are dismissed for vagueness, requiring a more definite statement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-17
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order because they failed to meet the required legal standards.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-19
The court recommended denying the motion to enjoin state court proceedings because the movants failed to show irreparable harm, as federal law already divests the state court of jurisdiction post-removal.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-20
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a plausible claim for violations of the anti-tampering ordinance, and claims previously dismissed with prejudice remain dismissed.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-10
The court held that the plaintiff's amended complaint was a shotgun pleading subject to dismissal and that she was not entitled to injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession upon FGT's deposit of security.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn the necessary easements for its pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that the plaintiff, Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC, has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to a preliminary injunction granting immediate possession.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted the plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment and a preliminary injunction, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements and granting immediate possession for pipeline construction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted partial summary judgment, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession to allow construction of a natural gas pipeline.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted partial summary judgment, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession, finding the project served the public interest and that irreparable harm would result from delays.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted partial summary judgment and a preliminary injunction, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements for an interstate natural gas pipeline and granting immediate possession.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and is entitled to immediate possession through a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted summary judgment, establishing FGT's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession, finding that FGT met the statutory requirements and the standard for injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-11-10
The court denied Acheron's motion to void or suspend the Services Agreement, finding that Acheron must bring a separate action for breach of the March 2015 Agreement and that the Services Agreement is not a Servicing Agreement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-29
The court held that federal inmates cannot join claims in a single complaint under the PLRA, and a pro se litigant cannot represent others as a 'next friend'.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2018-04-10
The FWC was entitled to summary judgment on the property owners' takings claims because they failed to allege either a permanent physical occupation of their land or complete deprivation of all economically beneficial use, as required to state a legally sufficient inverse condemn
-
898 F. Supp. 35·
S.D. Fla.·
1997-04-14
The court held that Lykes Pasco failed to take reasonable steps to ensure its farm labor contractors were transporting workers only in authorized vehicles, violating the AWPA. The court also found that claims regarding unsafe bus transport were moot and claims regarding disclosur
-
460 So. 2d 1026·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1984-12-28
The Fourth District reversed an injunction against the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, holding that as-applied constitutional challenges to administrative action must be raised on appeal after final agency action, not in circuit court during the administrative proces
-
S.D. Fla.·
1931-01-01
An interstate bus operator sought an interlocutory injunction against enforcement of a 1929 Florida statute regulating motor vehicle transportation, claiming it violated the Commerce Clause, the Fourteenth Amendment, and federal highway acts. The court denied the injunction, hold