Injunction

5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,126 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Nat'l Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. v. Burke
  608 F.2d 819· 1st Cir.· 1979-10-12 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of certain state regulations, as the doctrine of primary jurisdiction did not bar a judicial determination of federal preemption.
• Ball v. William B. Mills under the Last Will and Testament and Codicils thereto of Alfred I. DuPont
  376 So. 2d 1174· Fla. 1st DCA· 1979-10-04 ·cited 26×
  This case involves a dispute among co-trustees of the Alfred I. DuPont testamentary trust regarding the sale of Florida National Banks stock. The appellate court reversed an award of interim attorney's fees to trustee Mills, holding that while attorney's fees may be awarded to a
• Ekanem v. The Health & Hosp. Corp. OF Marion Cnty.
  589 F.2d 316· 7th Cir.· 1978-12-21 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court abused its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable injury.
• Paige v. Harris
  584 F.2d 178· 7th Cir.· 1978-09-12 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  A HUD attorney in the excepted service, terminated without a hearing, has a property interest in continued employment based on HUD Handbook 302.2, entitling them to a hearing to challenge the sufficiency of the grounds for discharge.
• Jennings v. Perrine Fish Mkt., Inc.
  360 So. 2d 434· Fla. 3d DCA· 1978-06-13 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the chancellor did not abuse discretion in denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
• Sid Casey v. Fed. Trade Comm'n
  578 F.2d 793· 9th Cir.· 1978-06-12 ·cited 26×
  The court held that federal courts should not intervene to prevent the FTC from investigating union locals and their officers, as the unions failed to demonstrate irreparable injury or a clear lack of FTC jurisdiction, and the issue of § 10's constitutionality was not justiciable
• Sangmeister v. Woodard
  565 F.2d 460· 7th Cir.· 1977-11-07 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the practice of Illinois County Clerks placing their own party's candidates in the top ballot position violates the Equal Protection Clause, but vacated the district court's specific rotational remedy, remanding for the clerks to devise a constitutionally perm
• Gen. Aircraft Corp. v. Irwin S. Lampert
  556 F.2d 90· 1st Cir.· 1977-05-26 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that while appellants violated Section 13(d) by failing to file a timely and accurate Schedule 13D, they should not have been enjoined from voting their legally acquired shares as no irreparable harm was shown for that specific relief.
• O'Donnell v. Wien AIR Alaska, Inc.
  551 F.2d 1141· 9th Cir.· 1977-04-06 ·cited 26×·via Status Quo Injunction
  The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the action and granting summary judgment, as the fire-hire policy was intertwined with the major dispute regarding crew complement, necessitating a status quo injunction.
• George W. Davis & Sons, Inc. v. Reubin O'D. Askew
  343 So. 2d 1329· Fla. 1st DCA· 1977-03-30 ·cited 26×
  Davis, a deep-sea fishing operator, sought relief from back admission taxes after the Department of Revenue reversed course on tax liability. The court held that estoppel applies against the state because Davis reasonably relied on a prior appellate decision invalidating the tax
• Grover H. Norton & Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. I. A. M. Nat'l Pension Fund
  553 F.2d 1352· D.C. Cir.· 1977-03-21 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the pension fund's denial of Norton's pension benefits, based on a retroactive application of an amended rule and forfeiture provisions, was arbitrary and capricious.
• United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers OF Am.
  519 F.2d 1249· 5th Cir.· 1975-09-24 ·cited 26×·via Boys Markets Injunction
  The court held that the district court applied the correct standard for union liability under the Taft-Hartley Act, but erred in excluding evidence of past strikes and in not fully developing the agency status of striking committeemen.
• Spinetti v. Atl. Richfield Co.
  522 F.2d 1401· Temp. Emer. Ct. App.· 1975-08-18 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that appeals from interlocutory orders denying preliminary injunctions in private actions arising under the Economic Stabilization Act and Allocation Act require certification by the district court, and absent such certification, this court lacks jurisdiction.
• Evans v. Lynn
  537 F.2d 571· 2d Cir.· 1975-06-02 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The dissent argues that minority residents of a county should have standing to challenge federal agency inaction in furthering housing policy mandates.
• Brandeis Mach. & Supply Corp. & State Equip. Co. v. Barber-Greene Co.
  503 F.2d 503· 6th Cir.· 1974-09-24 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction, finding no clear error in its determination of a likelihood of success on the merits.
• United States v. Rohm & Haas Co. & Rohm & Haas of Tex.
  500 F.2d 167· 5th Cir.· 1974-09-09 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments did not abate pending Refuse Act suits, and that the doctrine of primary jurisdiction did not require remand to the EPA. The court also found the barging injunction lacked a proper basis.
• LA Raza Unida OF S. Alameda Cnty. v. Volpe
  488 F.2d 559· 9th Cir.· 1973-11-29 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that state highway commissions must comply with federal relocation and environmental protection statutes before project approval and federal funding, not merely as an option to receive funding.
• Buffler v. Elec. Computer Programming Inst., Inc.
  466 F.2d 694· 6th Cir.· 1972-08-30 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  An order granting a preliminary injunction against arbitration proceedings is an appealable interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and the district court improvidently exercised its discretion in issuing such an injunction without sufficient basis.
• JET AIR Freight v. JET AIR Freight Delivery, Inc.
  264 So. 2d 35· Fla. 3d DCA· 1972-06-13 ·cited 26×
  A Florida freight cartage company (Jet Air Freight, incorporated 1960) sought to enjoin a nationwide air freight forwarder (Jet Air Freight, incorporated 1959 as Jet Transportation) from using the similar name in Dade and Broward Counties. The trial court granted a partial injunc
• Linwood T. Ford v. Kammerer
  450 F.2d 279· 3d Cir.· 1971-10-29 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that a contempt order based on violation of a preliminary injunction must be reversed if the injunction's terms do not specifically prohibit the conduct found to be contemptuous.
• United States v. Robinson
  449 F.2d 925· 9th Cir.· 1971-10-05 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the appellants received sufficient notice of the contempt charges and that the evidence supported their convictions for violating the preliminary injunction.
• A. L. K. Corp. v. Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc.
  440 F.2d 761· 3d Cir.· 1971-04-07 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate irreparable injury, a prerequisite for a preliminary injunction, because potential lost income from a unique film could be adequately remedied by monetary damages.
• Bradley v. Milliken
  433 F.2d 897· 6th Cir.· 1970-10-13 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that Section 12 of Michigan Act 48 is unconstitutional as it violates the Fourteenth Amendment by impeding the Detroit Board of Education's efforts to achieve racial balance in schools. The court also reversed the dismissal of the Governor and Attorney General as p
• Belknap v. Leary
  427 F.2d 496· 2d Cir.· 1970-05-29 ·cited 26×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that a temporary restraining order, even if short-lived, can be appealable if it functions as a mandatory injunction. However, the order in this case was vacated as an abuse of discretion.
• McSURELY v. McCLELLAN
  426 F.2d 664· D.C. Cir.· 1970-03-26 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the order denying a stay of criminal proceedings was appealable as a final decision, but that the stay of civil proceedings was an abuse of discretion and should be vacated.
• Argosy Ltd. v. Hennigan
  404 F.2d 14· 5th Cir.· 1968-11-05 ·cited 26×·via Action For Injunction
  The district court correctly dismissed the action for want of subject-matter jurisdiction, as the determination of whether an article is an import falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Customs Court.
• Chapman v. Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers' Union
  401 F.2d 626· 4th Cir.· 1968-09-25 ·cited 26×·via Request For Injunction
  The denial of a motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration is not an immediately appealable interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) when the underlying action seeks substantial equitable relief, even if legal relief is also sought.
• La. High Sch. Athletic Ass'n v. ST. Augustine High Sch.
  396 F.2d 224· 5th Cir.· 1968-05-08 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the Louisiana High School Athletic Association's (LHSAA) activities constitute state action and that denying membership to St. Augustine High School on racial grounds or through an arbitrary vote violates constitutional standards.
• NEW Orleans S.S. Ass'n v. General Longshore Workers
  389 F.2d 369· 5th Cir.· 1968-01-26 ·cited 26×·via Mandatory Injunction
  A federal court has jurisdiction to enforce an arbitrator's cease and desist order regarding work stoppages, even though the Norris-LaGuardia Act generally prohibits injunctions in labor disputes.
• Brennan v. Udall
  379 F.2d 803· 10th Cir.· 1967-06-22 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the Department of the Interior's consistent interpretation of 'oil' in patent reservations to include 'oil shale' under the 1914 Act is reasonable and should be respected.
• Wirtz v. Atlas Roofing Mfg. Co., Inc.
  377 F.2d 112· 5th Cir.· 1967-05-12 ·cited 26×·via Permanent Injunction
  The court held that a permanent injunction is warranted despite the employer's current compliance, given a history of persistent violations and demonstrated indifference to the Fair Labor Standards Act.
• John P. Parrish an Frances S. Parrish v. United States
  376 F.2d 601· 4th Cir.· 1967-04-19 ·cited 26×
  The court held that events occurring subsequent to the district court's decision should not be considered when determining the appealability of that judgment.
• Rural Electrification Administration v. Cent. La. Elec. Co., Inc.
  354 F.2d 859· 5th Cir.· 1966-01-13 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the plaintiffs, investor-owned electric companies, lacked the requisite standing to challenge a loan made by the Rural Electrification Administration to a cooperative, and that the courts lacked jurisdiction to review such loan decisions.
• The W. E. Bassett Co. v. Revlon, Inc.
  354 F.2d 868· 2d Cir.· 1966-01-03 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  A preliminary injunction against trademark infringement is modified to allow the sale of existing inventory, but further use of the infringing mark is prohibited.
• Imperial Chem. Indus. Ltd. v. Nat'l Distillers & Chem. Corp.
  354 F.2d 459· 2d Cir.· 1965-12-29 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction because the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence of irreparable injury.
• Hedberg v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
  350 F.2d 924· 8th Cir.· 1965-08-30 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the plaintiffs' claims could be aggregated to meet the jurisdictional amount because they had a common and undivided interest in the defendant's conduct, and that the restrictive covenant in the employment contracts was reasonable and enforceable under Minneso
• Lawrence Typographical Union v. McCULLOCH
  349 F.2d 704· D.C. Cir.· 1965-05-06 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the Board's refusal to allow the union to present evidence of employer instigation during a representation election hearing did not violate due process.
• THE Florida BAR v. Albert P. Town
  174 So. 2d 395· Fla.· 1965-04-21 ·cited 26×
  The Florida Bar petitioned the Florida Supreme Court to hold Albert P. Town in contempt for unauthorized practice of law by forming corporations and preparing corporate documents without being a licensed attorney. The Court held that preparing corporate charters and related docum
• ST. JOE Paper Co. v. RAY
  172 So. 2d 646· Fla. 1st DCA· 1965-03-16 ·cited 26×
  St. Joe Paper Company challenged a personal property tax assessment by Calhoun County Tax Assessor for allegedly lacking a filed schedule of property. The court held that the failure to file a schedule is a correctable procedural omission that does not void an otherwise valid ass
• Coleman v. Brotherhood OF Railway AND Steamship Clerks
  340 F.2d 206· 2d Cir.· 1965-01-08 ·cited 26×
  A union member's suit under Title V of the LMRDA requires a prior request to the union for action, and allegations of procedural irregularities in passing a resolution do not state a claim under Title V.
• United States v. Bd. OF Educ. OF Greene Cnty.
  332 F.2d 40· 5th Cir.· 1964-05-15 ·cited 26×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding no clear error in the factual findings and no abuse of discretion in denying the injunction.
• Lion Mfg. Corp. (new Lion) v. Kennedy
  330 F.2d 833· D.C. Cir.· 1964-03-05 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the district court correctly dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction because the plaintiffs failed to establish a case or controversy. The plaintiffs' fears of prosecution were too speculative and generalized.
• Lon Southerland v. ST. Croix Taxicab Ass'n & the Gov't of the Virgin Islands
  315 F.2d 364· 3d Cir.· 1963-03-20 ·cited 26×
  A clause in an exclusive airport franchise agreement, defining vehicles used by tour operators as 'vehicles for hire,' is invalid as an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce when applied to transport that is an integral part of an all-expense interstate tour.
• Harrison-Halsted Cmty. Grp., Inc. v. Hous. & Home Fin. Agency
  310 F.2d 99· 7th Cir.· 1962-11-28 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue in federal court and failed to raise a substantial federal question, thus affirming the district court's dismissal.
• United States ex rel. Ralph J. Hoge v. Bolsinger
  311 F.2d 215· 3d Cir.· 1962-10-31 ·cited 26×
  The court held that the appellant failed to allege facts establishing a cause of action under federal law for violations of his civil rights or equal protection.
• Glenn v. Reed
  289 F.2d 462· D.C. Cir.· 1961-04-07 ·cited 26×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that an offer of counsel 17 months after an invalid parole revocation hearing does not cure the defect, and the prisoner must be released.
• ST. Helena Parish Sch. Bd. v. Hall
  287 F.2d 376· 5th Cir.· 1961-02-09 ·cited 26×·via Permanent Injunction
  The court held that the school board's arguments against the injunction were without merit, affirming the lower court's grant of summary judgment for desegregation.
• E. States Petroleum Corp. v. Rogers
  280 F.2d 611· D.C. Cir.· 1960-05-12 ·cited 26×
  The District Court correctly dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, as the Customs Court has exclusive jurisdiction over import tax disputes, and a single judge can dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
• Brumby Metals, Inc. v. Bargen
  275 F.2d 46· 7th Cir.· 1960-02-15 ·cited 26×·via Preliminary Injunction
  A party can waive the right to strict compliance with Rule 65(d)'s specificity requirements for injunctions by consenting to the form of the injunction order.
• Fla. State Tpk. Auth. v. Anhoco Corp.
  116 So. 2d 8· Fla.· 1959-06-10 ·cited 26×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The Florida Supreme Court resolved conflicting interpretations of a "Right-of-Way Deed" between the State Road Department/Dade County and theater operators regarding property access along State Road 826. The Court held that the deed created only an additional easement rather than