5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The appeal is moot because the correctional officers had already answered the questions, and no criminal charges were contemplated, rendering the injunction unnecessary.
-
The court granted a preliminary injunction, enjoining the defendants from arresting the plaintiff under the trespass-after-warning statute while he engages in door-to-door political expression during specific hours on public housing property.
-
The court held that prior criminal convictions, affirmed on direct appeal, collaterally estop the defendants from contesting violations of the Exchange Act in a subsequent civil proceeding seeking permanent injunctions.
-
The court held that the bankruptcy court's dismissal of claims against L & S Industries did not preclude the Stefans from asserting those claims in state court because there was no privity between them and the bankruptcy trustee. The court also affirmed the bankruptcy court's dec
-
The court held that Marathon's notice of termination was effective for deficiencies during the June periods, but not for the September periods due to LNT's timely payment. The contract terminated based on the June deficiencies.
-
The court held that the title of a newspaper column can acquire trademark status and be protected under the Lanham Act.
-
988 F.2d 498·
4th Cir.·
1993-03-08
The court held that the appeal regarding the automatic stay's applicability was moot due to foreclosure, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in enjoining further proceedings in New York.
-
The court held that a preliminary injunction would not be granted because the school's policy regarding the distribution of literature was not definitively applied or violated in the student's specific case.
-
The court held that a preliminary injunction was appropriate, but modified the definition of 'customers' to be those with an ongoing business relationship at the time of termination.
-
The Florida Department of Administration's Division of Retirement appealed a temporary injunction granted to Calhoun County. The court reversed the injunction for two specific time periods, finding the county failed to satisfy the legal requirements for obtaining a temporary inju
-
985 F.2d 677·
2d Cir.·
1993-02-09
The court held that interpleader was proper for the $1.8 million fund but not for the $1.2 million fund, and the injunction was therefore too broad.
-
The court held that Interboro received constitutionally adequate due process through its extensive written submissions and available post-deprivation remedies, and thus was not entitled to a preliminary injunction or an evidentiary hearing.
-
A federal court cannot grant an injunction to stay arbitration proceedings ordered by a state court, as such an order constitutes a state court proceeding protected by the Anti-Injunction Act.
-
985 F.2d 1397·
9th Cir.·
1993-02-02
The court held that the appellants' right to purchase water was subject to subsequent legislation affecting that right, and the contracts did not unequivocally surrender Congress's sovereign power to legislate.
-
The court held that the non-compete and confidential information clauses in the employment agreements were overbroad and thus void and unenforceable under Wisconsin law.
-
The court held that the lower court had jurisdiction over the trustee and that the evidence supported the issuance of a temporary injunction.
-
The court held that the preliminary injunction and contempt order were invalid due to vagueness and lack of specificity, violating Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(d).
-
-
The court held that the special overtime provisions for firefighters under 29 U.S.C. § 207(k) apply even if the employer initially violates them, and damages should be calculated based on those provisions, not the general 40-hour rule.
-
982 F.2d 371·
9th Cir.·
1992-12-23
An injunction restraining state eminent domain proceedings violates the Anti-Injunction Act when the prior federal judgment did not actually decide the issues raised in the state action and thus cannot create a conflict or be a res judicata bar.
-
607 So. 2d 489·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1992-11-04
The Kormans appealed from a judgment enjoining them from walking their unleashed dog on common condominium property and awarding attorney's fees to the Pond Apple Maintenance Association. The court affirmed the injunction but reversed and remanded the attorney's fees award to req
-
A target company must allege an antitrust injury, defined as an injury of the type the antitrust laws were intended to prevent, to obtain a preliminary injunction under the Clayton Act.
-
The court held that the district court lacked jurisdiction because the alien failed to exhaust administrative remedies before challenging the INS's authority to initiate exclusion proceedings.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits of his claim that disseminating confidential personnel records constituted protected activity under Title VII, and thus denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
977 F.2d 428·
8th Cir.·
1992-10-13
The court held that the Army Corps of Engineers acted arbitrarily and capriciously in determining that the proposed road extension would not significantly affect the human environment, thus requiring an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
-
976 F.2d 1189·
8th Cir.·
1992-10-09
The court affirmed the district court's injunction against trade secret disclosure for one year and its refusal to enforce the non-compete covenant, finding the covenant unenforceable under Illinois law.
-
The court held that the possessory credit 'Stephen King's The Lawnmower Man' was a false attribution likely to cause confusion and harm, but the 'based upon' credit was permissible given the material similarities between the story and the film.
-
In this post-dissolution custody modification case, the trial court modified custody and visitation arrangements after finding that the mother had fabricated sexual abuse allegations against the father to prevent visitation, and that she had coached the children to make false sta
-
The dissenting judge would reverse the district court's decision, finding the settlement agreement's interpretation more plausible for Hall.
-
A Florida court reversed a temporary injunction that restricted voting eligibility at a congregational meeting to remove an evangelical Lutheran minister. The court held that the First Amendment prohibits civil courts from intervening in the internal governance disputes of hierar
-
973 F.2d 1118·
3d Cir.·
1992-08-31
The court held that challenges to a legislature's compliance with its own internal rules, absent a violation of external law, present nonjusticiable political questions. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of the complaint and grant of summary judgment for the defen
-
974 F.2d 1·
1st Cir.·
1992-08-14
The court held that a bidder's failure to submit a proper bid guarantee is a material defect requiring rejection of the bid, and that a protest regarding a bid's responsiveness must be filed within a reasonable time after the irregularity is known or should have been known.
-
603 So. 2d 74·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1992-07-29
This case addresses whether a trial court may issue a temporary restraining order preventing a former wife from removing minor children from Florida without posting a bond and without notice. The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the trial court erred in fail
-
A municipality has the power to enter into a long-term contract for electricity rates, even if it also possesses legislative rate-setting authority, provided the contract is within its proprietary powers and not expressly prohibited by statute.
-
The court held that the operation of ILN's investment programs constituted the fraudulent offer or sale of unregistered securities, and affirmed the district court's preliminary injunction.
-
A third-party beneficiary to an injunction bond is entitled to recover attorney's fees under Texas law, even if not a direct party to the bond.
-
The court held that the district court erred in granting a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, particularly regarding the functionality of the product's design and the likelihood of confusion for the trademark
-
The Court held that the St. Paul ordinance was facially unconstitutional because it prohibited fighting words based on content, which violates the First Amendment. The Court also found that the ordinance was not narrowly tailored to serve compelling state interests and that the l
-
The court held that the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) was intended to abrogate prior agreements allowing the use of supervisory goodwill for regulatory capital, and thus the preliminary injunction was improperly granted.
-
959 F.2d 617·
6th Cir.·
1992-03-26
The court held that FDCK's acceptance of Martin Marietta's counteroffer was effective before revocation and was unconditional, thus forming a contract.
-
The court held that the trial court erred in issuing a temporary injunction that prohibited the defendant from initiating legal action to collect on a promissory note or foreclose on assets.
-
The court held that the district court abused its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs have no likelihood of prevailing on their waiver or estoppel theories regarding voting rights as transferees of partnership units.
-
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the complaints sua sponte without providing adequate notice and opportunity for the plaintiffs to oppose summary judgment.
-
594 So. 2d 828·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1992-02-26
The appellate court reviewed an injunction against a condominium association's enforcement of a truck restriction, where the trial court found the association estopped by its conduct from enforcing the restriction.
-
958 F.2d 168·
7th Cir.·
1992-02-14
The court held that the appellant, a voter who intervened in the district court, lacked standing to appeal the district court's judgment because she did not demonstrate a concrete injury. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
-
The court held that the district court did not err in issuing an area-wide preliminary injunction without an evidentiary hearing and that it had jurisdiction to do so, as administrative remedies had proven futile.
-
591 So. 2d 1123·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1992-01-07
The court held that a triable action lies for both an express easement due to a scrivener's error and a prescriptive easement, precluding summary judgment.
-
The court held that the term 'Clipper' is generic when used in relation to ships and cruise services, and therefore not protectable as a trademark.
-
953 F.2d 1·
1st Cir.·
1991-12-27
The court held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act prohibits injunctions in labor disputes, and the exception for injunctions in aid of arbitration does not apply when arbitration has not been sought.
-
The Fourth Circuit reversed the grant of a preliminary injunction, finding the district court improperly balanced the hardships and likelihood of success, and that the plaintiff did not sufficiently demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits.