5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting the plaintiff's motion for default final judgment.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief and did not properly initiate a civil rights action.
-
The court held that the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards mandates arbitration of the dispute, as the four jurisdictional prerequisites are met and the plaintiff's defenses are unavailing.
-
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on the adidas trademarks and ordering the restraint of assets.
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction and denied the motion for a preliminary injunction without prejudice.
-
The court granted a Temporary Restraining Order, finding plaintiffs had a substantial likelihood of success on their claims for violation of the Defend Trade Secrets Act and tortious interference with business relationships, and that irreparable harm would result from disclosure
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining the defendant from manufacturing, selling, or distributing infringing and counterfeit goods bearing the plaintiff's trademarks.
-
The court granted the plaintiffs' ex parte application for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their copyright infringement claim and the potential for irreparable harm.
-
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order because the requests were moot and the court lacked jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus.
-
An anonymous phone call to law enforcement, where the caller declines to make a full disclosure and never follows up, does not constitute a "report" of sexual violence as required by Florida Statutes § 784.046(2)(c) for standing to petition for a sexual violence injunction. The s
-
The court held that default judgment against the defendant is appropriate and granted the United States' motion.
-
Parental rights were properly terminated under § 39.806(1)(c) where clear and convincing evidence established that the mother's conduct—maintaining contact with an abusive father despite a court order and domestic violence injunction—demonstrated that her continuing involvement t
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2023-11-22
A temporary injunction is defective and reversible when the trial court fails to set a bond as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b), and on remand the court must set an appropriate bond after providing all parties an opportunity to present evidence on the proper a
-
The court held that a prisoner's allegations of being ignored during a suicide attempt state a plausible claim for deliberate indifference, but a failure to report claim is insufficient without alleging a specific risk of harm.
-
Head Kandy LLC sued former officer Kayla McNeill in federal court in Florida for allegedly misappropriating company funds through fraudulent expense reimbursements, unauthorized payroll charges, and disparaging statements that harmed the business. The court granted in part and de
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a strong probability of success on the merits and irreparable harm to the plaintiff.
-
NCF Freedom Inc. and other New College faculty and students sued to block the enforcement of Florida's SB 266, which restricts what can be taught in general education courses and limits state funding for certain campus programs and activities, arguing the law violates First Amend
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery is denied because good cause was not established.
-
The appellate court reversed a permanent injunction against condominium owners, finding the hearing procedurally improper because it lacked adequate notice that it would serve as a final hearing on the merits. The court emphasized that parties are entitled to rely on procedural r
-
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss all claims against the TTT Defendants without prejudice, finding no clear legal prejudice to the defendants.
-
A trial court has wide discretion to grant or deny a temporary injunction, and an appellate court will not interfere unless the party challenging the decision clearly shows an abuse of that discretion.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
Courts may offset competing judgments from separate lawsuits when the entry of separate judgments would create an absurd result, such as allowing an insolvent party to collect on a smaller judgment while preventing the other party from collecting on a larger judgment. The right o
-
The appellate court reversed a lower court's decision to dissolve a domestic violence injunction and restart supervised timesharing. The court found the lower court abused its discretion by relying on a psychiatrist's testimony that was not fully informed of the father's post-inj
-
The appellate court reversed a lower court's decision to dissolve a domestic violence injunction and restart supervised timesharing. The court found the lower court abused its discretion by relying on a biased expert's testimony and failing to order a neutral psychological examin
-
This case involves an appeal challenging three trial court orders related to a dispute over the dissolution of medical practice entities. The appellate court dismissed the petition because the issues concerning the status quo orders were moot, and the petition for review of the c
-
The court recommended granting a permanent injunction and default judgment for disgorgement of profits, but denied actual damages due to insufficient proof of proximate causation.
-
The court held that the non-solicitation clause in the operating agreement unambiguously restricts the defendant from soliciting any of the plaintiff's current or prospective clients, and that the restrictive covenants are valid under Florida law.
-
The court denied the inmate's motion for an injunction because he failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits and improperly joined unrelated claims in his complaint.
-
The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to disgorgement of the defendant's profits due to willful trademark infringement and granted the permanent injunction in part.
-
The court denied the inmate's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to meet the heightened burden required for a mandatory injunction and did not act with sufficient alacrity.
-
The court granted the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's motion for a preliminary injunction against Timothy Stubbs, finding a prima facie showing of violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and a reasonable likelihood of future violations.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for default judgment against all defendants because the motion failed to address prior court orders and contained numerous deficiencies in pleading and proof.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2023-09-22
The court held that the DiStefanos, as owners of the servient estate, may continue to park vehicles on a portion of the easement, provided such use does not unreasonably interfere with Westminster Club's ingress and egress. The court granted the DiStefanos' motion for summary jud
-
A preliminary injunction that merely preserves the status quo does not alter the legal relationship between parties and thus does not confer prevailing party status for EAJA attorney fees.
-
Betty's Best, Inc. sued numerous online sellers across multiple e-commerce platforms (Amazon, eBay, Walmart, Wish, and others) for manufacturing, importing, and selling counterfeit grooming tools bearing infringing trademarks, copyrighted images, and design patents. The court gra
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants for patent infringement.
-
-
The court affirmed the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding the plaintiff failed to meet the required legal standards.
-
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief against defaulting defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
-
The court granted Spimerica's ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on tortious interference claims and imminent irreparable harm.
-
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2023-09-01
This case involves a dispute between neighboring landowners over an easement. The appellate court reversed the trial court's dismissal of the case, finding that the trial court improperly considered evidence outside the complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-08-29
The court granted the petitioner's motion, approving the amended ad interim stipulation and directing the issuance of a monition and injunction to restrain further prosecution of claims.
-
The Florida Supreme Court amended five family law forms governing petitions for protective injunctions against domestic violence, repeat violence, dating violence, sexual violence, and stalking to reflect recent statutory changes and updated court procedures. The amendments added
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against the defendants identified on Schedule A, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff's pleading was deficient and the relevant contract clauses were not provided.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to continue the hearing but denied the motion to seal documents, finding no exceptional circumstances to justify continued anonymity.
-
The court held that the Florida Department of Corrections' grooming policy, as applied to Shabazz, violates his rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) because it is not the least restrictive means of furthering compelling governmental inter
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-08-14
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant default judgment in part, enjoining the defendant from using the contested marks but denying attorney's fees.