5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-19
The court granted the petitioner's unopposed motion, approving the letter of undertaking and directing the issuance of monition and injunction.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction must be denied because they failed to comply with federal and local rules regarding notice and procedural requirements for such relief.
-
The court granted in part the insurer's motion for interpleader, allowing deposit of funds and dismissal, but adopted the narrower injunction requested in the original complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-12
The court held that the Petitioner's motion to approve the ad interim stipulation and enter monition and injunction must be denied because the stipulation was deficient and did not comply with the requirements of Supplemental Rule F.
-
The court recommended denying the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury.
-
Joinder of multiple defendants in an intellectual property infringement action is improper under Rule 20 when the plaintiff only alleges that each defendant infringes the same intellectual property without demonstrating that the claims arise from the same transaction or occurrenc
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-08-08
The court held that the defendants' counterclaim for judicial dissolution based on alleged asset waste/misappropriation and deadlock failed to state a plausible claim for relief.
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction must be denied because it failed to comply with federal and local rules regarding notice to the adverse party.
-
The court denied plaintiffs' motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because they failed to comply with procedural rules regarding notice and certification.
-
The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding that the defendant's alleged defamatory statements were made in furtherance of tortious interference and met the criteria for injunctive relief.
-
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the appellants' claims, holding that the Court of Chancery correctly dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to the absence of a reasonable apprehension of future harm. The Superior Court also correctly
-
The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from using plaintiff's trademarks and patents in connection with counterfeit products.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish entitlement to a preliminary injunction because the alleged harm was speculative and the balance of hardships did not favor the plaintiff.
-
The court accepted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to explain the significant delay in seeking emergency relief.
-
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a strong probability of success on the merits and the likelihood of irreparable harm to the plaintiff.
-
A trial court may not assess investigative costs under section 938.27, Florida Statutes, unless the prosecutor specifically requests them on behalf of the agency.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for sanctions without prejudice because it failed to comply with the procedural and substantive requirements for a preliminary injunction or sanctions.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to sufficiently plead a 'class of one' equal protection claim because it did not identify a similarly situated comparator with adequate specificity, and dismissed the procedural due process claim for failure to plead the unavailability of
-
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its trade secret misappropriation claims and a likelihood of irreparable injury.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its First Amendment challenge to the county's closing time ordinance.
-
The Court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment against Defendants.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to enter a final default judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.
-
The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding sufficient basis for breach of contract damages but denying specific performance and injunctive relief for the REDOX product.
-
The Court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, holding that the dispute over billed-but-not-booked capital expenditures (BBNB CapEx) must first be submitted to an independent expert as provided by the contract, rather than being adjudicated by the court. Th
-
The court held that a preliminary injunction should not be granted because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable injury, despite the application of Puerto Rico's Law 75.
-
92 On The Bay, LLC, the winning bidder at a tax deed auction, appeals a temporary injunction granted to The River Front Master Association, Inc., preventing the sale of property deemed a common area of a planned community. The court affirmed the injunction, finding no abuse of di
-
Lucas Connor Whalen appeals a final injunction for protection against domestic violence issued by the Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The Third District Court of Appeal reversed the injunction because technical issues prevented the full electronic recording of the evidentiary hearing a
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to meet the required legal standards for such relief.
-
The Court amended nine Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms by removing language requiring notary verification in accordance with amendments to sections 741.30, 784.046, and 784.0485, Florida Statutes. The Court also made other changes to improve clarity and promote co
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2024-06-19
The State failed to present sufficient evidence of substantial emotional distress required to establish the harassment element of aggravated stalking after an injunction. A third party's general statement that the victim was "concerned" and "worried" is insufficient to prove subs
-
The court held that restrictive covenants in employment agreements were lawful, valid, and enforceable, and that former employees breached these covenants by failing to provide notice and by soliciting clients and employees.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-06-14
The court held that an ad interim stipulation without an accompanying letter of undertaking from the insurer does not constitute "approved security" under the Limitation of Liability Act and Supplemental Rule F.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-06-13
The court held that the insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify the insured for claims arising from the misappropriation of escrow funds due to a policy exclusion, but has a duty to defend (though not necessarily indemnify) for defamation and tortious interference claims.
-
The court denied Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
The court held that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction due to a statutory review scheme, precluding district court review of Florida's claims regarding CMS FAQs.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on her copyrighted works.
-
The court approved the magistrate judge's reports and recommendations, granting in part and denying in part the motion to enforce an injunction, for contempt, and for sanctions.
-
Celcor Trust LLC appealed the trial court's denial of a mandatory injunction to compel the Shoma Homes at Keys Cove Condominium Association to repair water, mold, and termite damage to a condominium unit's drywall and flooring. The trial court found that an injunction was inappro
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation for default judgment, but modified the proposed injunction to comply with Rule 65(d)'s specificity requirements.
-
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
A domestic violence injunction petition must be dismissed when the only incident of physical violence is stale and the remaining allegations consist only of harassment and verbal abuse.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the defendants' motion to determine no irreparable harm before a preliminary injunction hearing.
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, granting the plaintiff's motion for final default judgment against the defaulting defendants.
-
The court recommended denying the defendants' motion to determine no irreparable harm without an evidentiary hearing.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant in part the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages and a permanent injunction, but denying costs.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-04-24
The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding damages and enjoining Defendant from copyright infringement.
-
The CFTC sued nine defendants for operating a fraudulent forex scheme through the fictitious web-based entity ROFX that misappropriated over $57.5 million from approximately 1,100 customers by accepting funds under false pretenses of forex trading while immediately transferring t
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting defendants' motions to dismiss in part and denying them in part without prejudice.