5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
Fla. 6th DCA·
2026-04-02
A party that recovers judgment on at least one count of its complaint is entitled to recover costs under Florida Statute 57.041(1) as a matter of right, without regard to whether it is the prevailing party on the significant issues for purposes of attorney's fees awards.
-
The trial court's award of full parental responsibility and time-sharing to the father, with limited therapeutic supervised visits for the mother, is affirmed under the deferential abuse of discretion standard, and the mother's motion for a written opinion is denied as a duplicat
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2026-03-25
The appellate court reversed a lower court's decision granting a prescriptive easement for a drainage pipe, finding that the use was presumed to be permissive and the claimant failed to prove otherwise. The court also clarified that the reasonable use rule for surface water drain
-
The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's temporary injunction order regarding proposed changes to real property, finding the written order facially insufficient under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c) and holding that the trial court failed to provide p
-
The NCAA appeals a trial court's issuance of a temporary injunction requiring it to grant Doctor Bradley eligibility to compete in college basketball for the 2025-2026 season, waiving the NCAA's Five-Year Rule. The appellate court quashes the injunction, finding the trial court's
-
Father appealed a final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence based on allegations of sexual abuse of a minor child. The appellate court reversed because the trial court improperly relied on inadmissible child hearsay statements without adequate corrobor
-
NEC Fund VI, a lender to Hecate Holdings, seeks a preliminary injunction to recover $75 million in settlement proceeds from Hecate's settlement with Repsol over a put option dispute. Although the court found NEC likely to succeed on breach of contract claims, it denied the prelim
-
The court granted plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement and a high probability of irreparable harm.
-
The court granted plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from using the ACDANC trademark on infringing products and ordering asset freezes.
-
The court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment.
-
The court adopted and approved the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting a Temporary Restraining Order against CBP to prevent the release of disputed cargo to anyone except the Plaintiff.
-
Jorge A. Zea sought a preliminary injunction to compel the National Association of Realtors to comply with its own binding rules. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation and denied Zea's motion for preliminary injunction.
-
A trial court does not abuse its discretion in granting a temporary injunction against a former employee for non-compete agreement breach when the employee's violation is supported by competent substantial evidence, because irreparable harm is presumed upon such a breach.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from using the plaintiff's trademark and freezing their assets.
-
MyCarrier seeks attorneys' fees as the prevailing party after the court denied Project 44's motion for preliminary injunction. The court stayed the fee award pending final resolution of the underlying breach of contract dispute in arbitration, finding substantial overlap between
-
The court held that it could not determine subject matter jurisdiction and denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction due to non-compliance with procedural rules.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's renewed motion for leave to file an amended complaint, extending the deadline for filing.
-
A plaintiff must demonstrate irreparable harm to obtain a preliminary injunction, and a mere showing of a constitutional violation, or speculative harm to principals, or the potential for later corrective action, does not meet this standard.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction must be denied because it failed to comply with applicable federal and local rules.
-
Four nonresident activists challenged Atlanta's requirement that signature gatherers on local referendum petitions be city residents, claiming it violated their First Amendment rights, and the district court granted their preliminary injunction. The Eleventh Circuit reversed, hol
-
An injunction for protection against domestic violence cannot be granted based solely on a child's fear of a parent; the evidence must establish either that the child was a victim of domestic violence or had reasonable cause to believe she was in imminent danger of becoming one,
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because the alleged harm was not actual or imminent, and the motion was procedurally deficient.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2026-01-06
The court held that the movant failed to establish a substantial likelihood of irreparable injury, a necessary prerequisite for a preliminary injunction.
-
The court granted in part and denied in part the petitioner's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order, enjoining respondents from removing the petitioner from the district but denying the request to enjoin her ongoing detention.
-
The court dismissed the appeal of the temporary injunction due to untimely filing of the notice of appeal (filed on day 34 instead of day 30), and affirmed the order denying the motion to vacate because the appellant failed to present sufficient argument to preserve appellate rev
-
BankUnited sought a preliminary injunction against former executives and their new employer Customers Bank for allegedly violating non-solicitation obligations. The Delaware Court of Chancery denied the injunction, finding BankUnited unlikely to succeed on the merits because the
-
The court affirmed and adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part the motion to dismiss ADA claims and staying the FHA claims under the Colorado River abstention doctrine.
-
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, granting Plaintiff's motion for default judgment and issuing a permanent injunction against Defendant Precision.
-
Plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction are denied because she failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2025-12-23
An order granting summary judgment on some counts of a multi-count complaint, while expressly withholding entry of final judgment pending resolution of remaining claims, is not appealable as a non-final order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(B) or (C)(ii) bec
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's reports and recommendations, granting a renewed temporary restraining order to prevent the removal of a child from the jurisdiction and requiring the surrender of the child's passport.
-
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the petitioner's claims challenging his detention and deportation due to the bar imposed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g).
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint and for CM/ECF access.
-
An order granting an injunction in the domestic violence context is reviewed for abuse of discretion, and the appellant's failure to provide a complete record is fatal to the appeal.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for breach of contract and irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-16
Default judgment was entered against defendants Hope of Glory Church of Christ and Stephanie Marie Clarke as personal representative, and the clerk was directed to disburse interpleaded funds. The plaintiff insurer was discharged from liability, and defendants were enjoined from
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to meet the required legal standards and procedural requirements.
-
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement claims and irreparable harm if relief is not granted.
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for default judgment and permanent injunction without prejudice due to deficiencies in supporting evidence and legal argument.
-
The court granted the motion for a permanent injunction with modifications, finding the proposed language overbroad and not fully compliant with Rule 65.
-
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on their trademarks and ordering the restraint of assets.
-
The court held that the district court abused its discretion by denying a preliminary injunction, finding the plaintiffs likely to succeed on their First Amendment challenge to the ordinance.
-
Certiorari review is unavailable to compel a trial court to rule on a pending post-election challenge, and even if reviewable, no irreparable harm exists where post-election remedies under section 102.168, Florida Statutes, could provide adequate relief.
-
The court recommended denial of the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because it failed to comply with procedural rules and did not establish the necessary prerequisites for such an extraordinary remedy.
-
The district court denied the plaintiff's motion for an injunction pending appeal because the Rooker-Feldman doctrine divested it of jurisdiction to review the plaintiff's challenge to a state court judgment, and denied the defendant's motion for sanctions without prejudice.
-
The court held that the district court failed to conduct the required facial challenge analysis under Moody v. NetChoice, necessitating a remand.
-
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, finding the plaintiff did not establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding the city's time, place, and manner restrictions on protest.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint, as filed, does not comply with the procedural rules necessary to seek a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction.