Injunction

5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Jones v. Schellenberger
  201 F.2d 29· 7th Cir.· 1953-01-16 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the District Court had jurisdiction and that the order appointing a receiver and issuing an injunction was proper given the defendant's actions.
• Borah v. White Cnty. Bridge Comm'n
  199 F.2d 213· 7th Cir.· 1952-10-17 ·cited 2×·via Mandatory Injunction
  An individual user and tollpayer of a bridge commission, without a special injury distinct from the public, is not an 'interested person' with a right to inspect commission records under the Act.
• Engel v. Catucci
  197 F.2d 597· D.C. Cir.· 1952-05-29 ·cited 2×
  A tax deed to a servient estate does not extinguish an appurtenant easement, especially when the easement is created by deed and the dominant estate's value has been assessed considering the easement.
• Cavendish Bridge Club v. S. Bell TEL. Co.
  1 Fla. Supp. 186· Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1952-02-01 ·cited 2×·via Application For Injunction
  Cavendish Bridge Club sought an injunction to prevent Southern Bell Telephone Company from removing its telephones based on an Attorney General determination that the club's phone numbers were used for illegal gambling. The court granted the injunction, holding that the Railroad
• West Edmond Hunton Lime Unit v. Stanolind OIL & GAS Co.
  193 F.2d 818· 10th Cir.· 1951-12-21 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the unit's right to exclusive possession and operation of the well and equipment for the Hunton formation was paramount, and continued Bartlesville production interfered with unit operations, justifying injunctive relief.
• Childs v. Ball Bros. Trucking Co., Inc.
  193 F.2d 134· 5th Cir.· 1951-12-20 ·cited 2×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court held that the appeal was untimely filed and should be dismissed.
• Stephen Foster Hotel v. S. Bell TEL. Co.
  1 Fla. Supp. 147· Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1951-10-31 ·cited 2×
  Stephen Foster Hotel sought to enjoin Southern Bell Telephone Company from disconnecting its phone service after the sheriff seized gambling equipment in a hotel room. The court dissolved the temporary injunction, found the hotel's telephone equipment was being used for illegal g
• Redwine v. Citizens & S. Nat. Bank
  189 F.2d 328· 5th Cir.· 1951-05-30 ·cited 2×·via Action For Injunction
  The court held that Section 271 of the Bankruptcy Act allows for the assessment and collection of previously undetermined state taxes, even after a reorganization plan has been confirmed, if the taxes were found to be owing within one year of the petition filing and not assessed
• Starns v. Humphries
  189 F.2d 357· 9th Cir.· 1951-05-01 ·cited 2×
  The court held that in a case of equitable cognizance, the trial court must enter findings of fact and conclusions of law, and cannot simply enter judgment on an advisory jury's verdict.
• Nordin v. MAY
  188 F.2d 411· 8th Cir.· 1951-04-27 ·cited 2×
  A covenant in a mortgage to furnish steam power at cost runs with the land and binds a successor or assign who acquires title or possession with knowledge, actual or constructive, of the covenant.
• Marzall v. Libby
  188 F.2d 1013· D.C. Cir.· 1951-03-29 ·cited 2×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that the Commissioner of Patents should have allowed the trademark opposition proceedings to go forward because the plaintiff's actions, while not strictly conforming to all statutory requirements within the initial 30-day period, were reasonable given the ambiguit
• McDonald v. McDonald
  189 F.2d 24· D.C. Cir.· 1951-03-22 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the appellee's declaratory judgment action did not violate the parties' agreement and affirmed the denial of an injunction.
• Smart v. Woods
  184 F.2d 714· 6th Cir.· 1950-10-27 ·cited 2×·via Action For Injunction
  The court held that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the Housing Expediter, who is an indispensable party residing in Washington D.C., and thus could not entertain the action filed in Ohio.
• Yates et ux. v. Gulf Oil Corp.
  182 F.2d 286· 5th Cir.· 1950-05-12 ·cited 2×
• Jeager v. Simrany
  180 F.2d 650· 9th Cir.· 1950-02-28 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the Commissioner of Immigration lacked the statutory authority to cancel a record of registry and certificate of lawful entry, even if procured by fraud.
• Soap Corp. of Am. v. Reynolds
  178 F.2d 503· 5th Cir.· 1949-12-19 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the denial of a jury trial was proper in this equitable nuisance action, and that the injunction against emitting obnoxious odors was appropriate, though it should be modifiable.
• Kraus v. Newman
  178 F.2d 655· 2d Cir.· 1949-12-16 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the order for a preliminary injunction was improper and reversed it, while affirming the denial of a motion to restrain threats related to a different product.
• Woods v. Malcolm-Dallyn Co.
  177 F.2d 414· 8th Cir.· 1949-11-03 ·cited 2×
  The appeal is dismissed as moot because the housing accommodations have been voluntarily vacated and the controversy has ceased to exist.
• Tringali v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Pottawatomie Cnty.
  176 F.2d 110· 10th Cir.· 1949-07-18 ·cited 2×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that reassessments against other lands in the district are not permissible to cover deficiencies for unpaid bonds when original assessments were valid.
• Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council of Orange Cnty. v. Le Baron
  181 F.2d 449· 9th Cir.· 1949-06-30 ·cited 2×·via Interlocutory Injunction
  The court denied the motion to suspend an injunction pending appeal, finding the arguments raised were either foreclosed by precedent or not properly before the court.
• Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. v. Allenstein
  173 F.2d 38· 5th Cir.· 1949-03-08 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the phrase 'Personal Loans' is a generic or descriptive term that cannot be exclusively appropriated, and that the defendants' use of the name did not constitute unfair competition as there was no actual competition, likelihood of deception, or demonstrable ha
• Pena v. Hammond
  172 F.2d 312· 5th Cir.· 1949-02-01 ·cited 2×
  A suit seeking an injunction to prevent the enforcement of a prior judgment constitutes a collateral attack and cannot be maintained if the prior judgment is final and has not been appealed.
• Alesna v. Rice
  172 F.2d 176· 9th Cir.· 1949-01-14 ·cited 2×
  The court held that federal courts should not enjoin territorial criminal prosecutions absent exceptional circumstances, as adequate remedies at law exist through appeal or prohibition.
• Plomb Tool Co. v. Fayette R. Plumb, Inc.
  171 F.2d 945· 9th Cir.· 1949-01-13 ·cited 2×·via Injunction Enforcement
  The Court of Appeals held that the contempt judgment, which enlarged upon the original injunction, was appealable and granted a stay of its enforcement pending further order.
• Loyning v. Loyning
  171 F.2d 565· 9th Cir.· 1949-01-03 ·cited 2×
  The court held that a mere refusal to acknowledge one court decree's superiority over another does not constitute contempt of court.
• Cartlidge v. Rainey
  168 F.2d 841· 5th Cir.· 1948-06-30 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the federal district court erred in granting a preliminary injunction because it lacked jurisdiction in rem over the seized property, which was in the custody of a state court, and because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which equitable relief could
• Woods v. Fliss
  168 F.2d 612· 7th Cir.· 1948-06-23 ·cited 2×·via Permanent Injunction
  A party must obey a court's lawful order unless modified or reversed, regardless of the underlying statute's constitutionality, and factual findings by the trial court are generally unassailable on appeal.
• Lansden v. Hart
  168 F.2d 409· 7th Cir.· 1948-05-05 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the Presidential and Governor's Proclamations prohibiting goose hunting were valid exercises of governmental authority and not arbitrary or capricious.
• McCOMB v. LA CASA DEL Transporte, Inc.
  167 F.2d 209· 1st Cir.· 1948-04-09 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the employer's method of calculating wages and overtime did not comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the failure to keep accurate records warranted injunctive relief.
• Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of Rector
  164 F.2d 938· 8th Cir.· 1947-12-26 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the city was not estopped from denying the power company a franchise and that the company lacked authority to construct a high voltage transmission line through city streets without proper permits and authorization, especially given the line's dangerous nature
• Gates v. Woods
  164 F.2d 936· 4th Cir.· 1947-12-23 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the trial judge did not err in allowing an amendment to the complaint to cover a later period of overcharges and in entering judgment for treble damages based on the jury's verdict.
• Fleming v. Simms
  164 F.2d 153· 5th Cir.· 1947-11-18 ·cited 2×
  The court held that a state court judgment awarding possession to landlords was not res judicata against the Housing Expediter seeking an injunction under federal rent regulations.
• Garlington v. Wasson
  164 F.2d 243· 5th Cir.· 1947-11-14 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the debtors could not reinstate their dismissed bankruptcy case under Section 75, nor could they file a new case under that section after ceasing to be farmers.
• Roth v. Reich
  164 F.2d 305· 2d Cir.· 1947-11-07 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the referee and judge erred in not deducting a portion of the debtor's attorney's fees and disbursements from the recovery when computing the contingent fee owed to the debtor's litigation attorney. The court affirmed the allowance of claims for legal services
• Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union NO. 3
  164 F.2d 71· 2d Cir.· 1947-11-06 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the district court's modified judgment and injunction, while not ideal in form, sufficiently complied with the Supreme Court's mandate by clarifying the illegality of union activities conducted in combination with non-labor groups to control prices and markets
• Koretzky v. Singer
  159 Fla. 501· Fla.· 1947-10-07 ·cited 2×
  The Florida Supreme Court held that a lessor's counterclaim alleging the lessee illegally operated a bookmaking establishment at leased hotel premises, thereby forfeiting the lease, must proceed despite the lessee's earlier assurance to stop the practice. The Court rejected the l
• Fleming v. Chapman
  161 F.2d 345· 2d Cir.· 1947-05-09 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the Administrator was entitled to an injunction to prevent the eviction of a tenant from housing accommodations, even if a state court had ordered eviction, because the federal regulations governed the situation.
• Porter v. Deer
  160 F.2d 394· 5th Cir.· 1947-04-05 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the plaintiff cannot use its agent's unauthorized mistake as a basis for a right of action against a defendant who acted in good faith on that advice.
• Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians of Alaska v. Olson
  160 F.2d 525· 9th Cir.· 1947-03-28 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the Tribe's complaint was properly dismissed because the United States, acting as guardian, had not authorized the suit, and the Commissioner of Indian Affairs lacked the statutory power to initiate such litigation.
• Porter v. Rabinowitz
  159 F.2d 512· 5th Cir.· 1947-02-19 ·cited 2×
  The court held that Maximum Price Regulation No. 541 covers bulk lot sales of raw muskrat pelts and that the determination of maximum prices for unlisted grades is based on established trade practices or usages.
• Fleming
  159 F.2d 212· 7th Cir.· 1947-01-29 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the defendant financially controlled K & M Lumber Company, thus violating price regulations, and affirmed the damages awarded but dissolved the injunction because the regulation was no longer in effect.
• Porter v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.
  158 F.2d 814· 6th Cir.· 1947-01-27 ·cited 2×·via Interlocutory Injunction
  The court held that automatic rate increases under pre-existing contracts were not subject to the notice and intervention requirements of the Stabilization Act, but new rate changes enacted after the Act's effective date were subject to these requirements.
• Porter v. Bledsoe
  159 F.2d 495· 4th Cir.· 1947-01-08 ·cited 2×·via Action For Injunction
  The defendants, as wholesalers, should not be held liable for shipments made prior to March 1, 1944, as they had no knowledge of the improper grading and reasonably relied on inspection certificates.
• Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers of Am.
  159 F.2d 18· D.C. Cir.· 1946-12-16 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the government, as operator of the mines, was authorized to recognize the union as the exclusive representative of supervisors, and this action was valid.
• Farmers Grain Co. v. Toledo
  158 F.2d 109· 7th Cir.· 1946-11-20 ·cited 2×
  The court should affirm the dismissal of the railroad's cross-complaint and order the issuance of a mandatory injunction compelling the railroad to resume operation, reversing the order appointing a receiver.
• Pangborn Corp. v. Am. Foundry Equip. Co.
  159 F.2d 88· 3d Cir.· 1946-08-12 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the concealment of material facts regarding a new patent application during the pendency of a preliminary injunction motion constituted civil contempt.
• Dennis v. Vill. OF Tonka BAY
  156 F.2d 672· 8th Cir.· 1946-07-26 ·cited 2×
  A village zoning ordinance is constitutional as applied to plaintiffs' property, even if it reduces the property's value for a specific commercial use, as long as it rationally relates to the community's health, safety, and general welfare.
• Santa Fe Pac. R. Co. v. Ickes
  153 F.2d 305· D.C. Cir.· 1946-02-04 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the Santa Fe Railroad's right to select "lieu" lands under the 1874 and 1904 Acts were separate contractual rights, not covered by the general release of "aid of construction" claims filed under the Transportation Act of 1940.
• Bowles v. Luster
  153 F.2d 382· 9th Cir.· 1946-01-31 ·cited 2×
  An injunction against price regulation violations should be broad enough to cover future amendments or substitutions of the same kind, but not so broad as to prevent the enjoined party from challenging new regulations.
• United States v. Los Angeles Soap Co.
  153 F.2d 320· 9th Cir.· 1946-01-29 ·cited 2×
  The court held that deposits made into the registry of the court pending an appeal were not tax payments, and therefore interest was owed on the late payment of taxes.