Injunction

5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Colonial Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
  577 F.2d 106· 10th Cir.· 1978-05-31 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Automobile Dealer Franchise Act's "under control" provision presented a jury question regarding Ford Credit's liability, and that damages from continuing conduct under the Act could accrue within the limitation period, applying the Zenith Radio Corp. doctr
• Stivers v. State OF Minn.
  575 F.2d 200· 8th Cir.· 1978-05-03 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Younger abstention doctrine applies to parties not named in state proceedings if their interests are closely related and they seek to interfere with those proceedings, even if state appellate remedies were not exhausted.
• In re J. D. Jewell, Inc. v. Hicks
  571 F.2d 928· 5th Cir.· 1978-04-21 ·cited 4×
  A party cannot recover damages for an injunction unless a security bond has been executed, and damages for loss of property cannot be attributed to an injunction if the property was lost while in the trustee's possession.
• Stenberg v. Cheker OIL Co. & Marathon Oil Co.
  573 F.2d 921· 6th Cir.· 1978-04-10 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the preliminary injunction granting ultimate relief and the subsequent contempt order were improperly issued and vacated them.
• Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Nw. Airlines, Inc.
  570 F.2d 257· 8th Cir.· 1978-01-31 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the dispute over implementing a new nonstop flight service was a minor dispute under the Railway Labor Act, and thus the district court correctly applied the proper principles in denying a preliminary injunction.
• Muss v. Rosenberg
  353 So. 2d 203· Fla. 3d DCA· 1977-12-20 ·cited 4×
  A Florida appellate court reversed a trial court's denial of a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction that was issued without bond or notice. The court held that absent evidence and findings that the plaintiff lacked sufficient assets to post a bond, the trial court erred in r
• Socialist Workers 1974 Nat'l Campaign Comm. v. Honorable W. Pat Jennings
  567 F.2d 1133· D.C. Cir.· 1977-12-13 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the order clarifying the FEC's procedural methods for compiling a factual record was not a preliminary injunction and therefore not appealable.
• Nat'l City Bank & the Cleveland Tr. Co. v. Honorable Frank J. Battisti
  581 F.2d 565· 6th Cir.· 1977-12-02 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that petitions for mandamus or prohibition cannot be used as a substitute for a readily available appeal procedure, but treated the matter as an expedited appeal due to the significant issues involved.
• Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Pasco Cnty. v. Hesse
  351 So. 2d 1124· Fla. 2d DCA· 1977-11-16 ·cited 4×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The appellate court reversed a lower court's order enforcing a prior judgment, finding that the lower court lacked jurisdiction to modify its final judgment and that the proposed modifications to the site plan constituted a material departure from the original agreement.
• Sunshores v. Cnty. OF Pinellas
  351 So. 2d 758· Fla. 2d DCA· 1977-11-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that while mandamus was an improper procedural vehicle, the dismissal of the complaint with prejudice was erroneous and should have been without prejudice to allow for alternative equitable claims.
• Cape v. Tenn. Secondary Sch. Athletic Ass'n
  563 F.2d 793· 6th Cir.· 1977-10-03 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court erred in finding the TSSAA girls' basketball rules violated the Equal Protection Clause, reversing the injunction.
• The Ideal Realty Co. v. United States & Dorothy Singletery
  561 F.2d 1123· 4th Cir.· 1977-09-20 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the two-year limitation period for suits to recover erroneous refunds does not preclude the IRS from using other summary collection procedures for interest due on delinquent taxes.
• Interco v. The First Nat'l Bank OF Boston
  560 F.2d 480· 1st Cir.· 1977-08-16 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that Interco failed to establish irreparable harm because it had an adequate remedy at law for the bank's alleged wrongful honor of letters of credit.
• Guse v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc.
  562 F.2d 6· 7th Cir.· 1977-08-10 ·cited 4×
  The exclusion of pregnancy from a disability benefits plan, without more, does not constitute sex discrimination under Title VII, especially when the plan is otherwise neutral.
• Ky. Fried Chicken Corp. v. Diversified Packaging Corp.
  552 F.2d 601· 5th Cir.· 1977-05-18 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court abused its discretion by denying a motion to enjoin relitigation of issues already decided, as the attempt to relitigate in another forum was vexatious.
• Consumers Union OF United States, Inc. v. Comm. FOR the Implementation OF Textile Agreements
  561 F.2d 872· D.C. Cir.· 1977-04-20 ·cited 4×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that the Customs Court has exclusive jurisdiction over challenges to the administration of the United States program regulating textile imports by quota.
• Hendrix v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen OF N. Am., AFL-CIO
  555 F.2d 175· 8th Cir.· 1977-04-18 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court erred in denying an injunction because the NLRB had reasonable cause to believe the National Labor Relations Act was being violated.
• Motor Vessels Theresa ANN v. Kreps
  548 F.2d 1382· 9th Cir.· 1977-02-24 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court abused its discretion in issuing a preliminary injunction, as the respondents failed to demonstrate a probable resolution favorable to their position or sufficiently serious legal questions.
• Greenspan v. Klein
  550 F.2d 856· 3d Cir.· 1977-02-10 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  A single district judge lacks jurisdiction to deny a preliminary injunction or abstain in a case requiring a three-judge court under 28 U.S.C. § 2281.
• The Town OF Surfside v. Cnty. Line Land Co.
  340 So. 2d 1287· Fla. 3d DCA· 1977-01-04 ·cited 4×
  The Town of Surfside appeals an injunction prohibiting it from accepting refuse at its municipal dump from outside entities. The court affirmed the injunction, finding substantial evidence that the dump's operation constitutes a nuisance affecting the health, safety, and welfare
• Hillsboro News Co. v. City OF Tampa
  544 F.2d 860· 5th Cir.· 1977-01-03 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction.
• Shelton v. Smith
  547 F.2d 768· 2d Cir.· 1976-12-28 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  Abstention was appropriate because the state statute may be interpreted to require a hearing before parental visiting rights are terminated, thus avoiding federal constitutional questions. The denial of a preliminary injunction is also affirmed.
• Mower v. Swyhart
  545 F.2d 103· 10th Cir.· 1976-11-17 ·cited 4×·via Permanent Injunction
  The court held that the district court correctly denied relief to the incarcerated appellant seeking mandamus, injunction, and damages.
• Freeman v. Burton Dyal McINTOSH, Jr.
  338 So. 2d 538· Fla. 4th DCA· 1976-07-16 ·cited 4×
  Property owners who purchased lots adjacent to a platted street retained rights to use that street after the city vacated it. The court affirmed a permanent injunction preventing neighboring property owners from obstructing the street, holding that the loss of access caused speci
• Daley v. Mathews
  536 F.2d 519· 2d Cir.· 1976-05-27 ·cited 4×·via Action For Injunction
  The court held that the physician's action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the FDA was not ripe for adjudication because the FDA had not taken sufficient affirmative action to create a concrete controversy.
• City OF Fort Lauderdale v. Gulf & E. Dev. Corp.
  332 So. 2d 88· Fla. 4th DCA· 1976-05-14 ·cited 4×
  The City of Fort Lauderdale rezoned property over the objection of Gulf & Eastern Development Corporation, which claimed it was not notified of the planning board hearing. The court reversed the trial court's invalidation of the ordinance, holding that procedural due process requ
• Adams v. Mathews
  536 F.2d 417· D.C. Cir.· 1976-05-07 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The WEAL plaintiffs were entitled to intervene in the Adams litigation as of right because their interest in the devotion of HEW resources to Title IX complaints was not represented by existing parties.
• Pacific Coast European Conference and its member lines v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n & United States
  537 F.2d 333· 9th Cir.· 1976-04-29 ·cited 4×·via Interlocutory Injunction
  The court held that the Federal Maritime Commission did not overstep its authority by issuing a cease-and-desist order to the Pacific Coast European Conference regarding its dual-rate contracts, as the order was a valid interpretation of the Shipping Act and not an illegal injunc
• Basin, Inc. v. Fed. Energy Admin. & Frank Zarb
  534 F.2d 324· Temp. Emer. Ct. App.· 1976-04-06 ·cited 4×
  The court vacated the preliminary injunction and remanded the case, finding that subsequent regulatory changes and ongoing reevaluations by the FEA warranted further consideration by the district court.
• Del. River Port Auth. v. Norbert T. Tiemann
  531 F.2d 699· 3d Cir.· 1976-03-10 ·cited 4×·via Permanent Injunction
  The court held that the Administrator's order lowering tolls could not be sustained because the Administrator failed to make specific findings regarding the Authority's post-coverage expenses and whether the prescribed tolls would be sufficient to cover them.
• Harrison v. Ind. Auto Shredders Co.
  528 F.2d 1107· 7th Cir.· 1975-12-31 ·cited 4×
  The dissenting judge agrees that punitive damages were an abuse of discretion but would modify the injunction to allow for potential continued operation under supervision.
• Rodos v. Michaelson
  527 F.2d 582· 1st Cir.· 1975-11-26 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the plaintiffs, including physicians and a pregnant woman, lacked standing to challenge the statute because they failed to demonstrate a concrete personal stake in the outcome or a genuine case or controversy.
• Feinberg v. The Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.
  522 F.2d 1335· D.C. Cir.· 1975-11-17 ·cited 4×·via Request For Injunction
  The court held that the appellant's constitutional claims regarding the FDIC's suspension order and the statutory bar to judicial review were substantial enough to require a three-judge court.
• Emhart Corp. v. USM Corp.
  527 F.2d 177· 1st Cir.· 1975-11-07 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the factual findings were insufficient to support barring Emhart's acquisition of USM shares, vacating the preliminary injunction.
• Gen. Mills, Inc. v. Jones
  530 F.2d 1317· 9th Cir.· 1975-10-29 ·cited 4×
  The court held that California's weight labeling statutes and regulations are preempted by federal law because they conflict with federal requirements for accurate weight labeling and reasonable variations. The court also found that a three-judge district court was not required.
• Mohawk Petroleum Corp., Inc. v. Dep't OF the Navy
  521 F.2d 1394· Temp. Emer. Ct. App.· 1975-08-26 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Federal Energy Administration's price and allocation regulations validly apply to crude oil sales by the Department of the Navy from the Naval Petroleum Reserve, even when a contract predates the regulations.
• Theriault v. Smith
  519 F.2d 809· 1st Cir.· 1975-07-30 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court had the power to vacate the injunction and that there was no probability that it abused its discretion in doing so.
• Caldwell v. The United States Dep't OF Hous. & Urban Dev. ["HUD"]
  522 F.2d 4· 4th Cir.· 1975-06-27 ·cited 4×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court affirmed the district court's denial of a temporary injunction and denied the appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal.
• Marston v. Gainesville SUN Publ'g Co., Inc.
  314 So. 2d 257· Fla. 1st DCA· 1975-06-16 ·cited 4×
  The court held that temporary injunctions were erroneously granted without sufficient grounds, proper notice, or adequate bond.
• Donner v. Margo Donner
  313 So. 2d 456· Fla. 3d DCA· 1975-06-03 ·cited 4×·via Injunction Bond
  Charles Donner appealed from a temporary injunction order that restrained him from transferring assets or stock in Muncie Construction Corporation during divorce proceedings. The Florida appellate court affirmed the injunction but narrowed its scope to restrain only Donner's indi
• Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n
  517 F.2d 1013· 7th Cir.· 1975-05-29 ·cited 4×·via Injunction Pending Appeal
  The court denied the emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal, finding no irreparable harm from proceeding with the FTC hearing.
• Pac. Mar. Ass'n v. Int'l Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union
  517 F.2d 1158· 9th Cir.· 1975-05-21 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that an arbitrator's decision defining a 'slowdown' and obligating unions to prevent it was enforceable, and that the subsequent court orders were sufficiently specific for contempt findings.
• Kiper v. State
  310 So. 2d 42· Fla. 1st DCA· 1975-03-11 ·cited 4×
  The trial court's injunction was improvidently issued because the State failed to establish by a preponderance of evidence that appellants violated Florida's animal cruelty statutes and that their activities constituted a public nuisance.
• Manpower v. Olsten Permanent Agency OF Cent. Fla., Inc.
  309 So. 2d 57· Fla. 2d DCA· 1975-02-14 ·cited 4×
  A third-party beneficiary cannot enforce a covenant not to compete under Fla. Stat. § 542.12.
• State v. Henely
  41 Fla. Supp. 190· Sarasota Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1975-01-10 ·cited 4×·via Suit For Injunction
  A mobile home park rule requiring removal of eight-or-ten-foot-wide mobile homes upon sale does not violate Fla. Stat. 83.71 because the removal is based on the home's width in addition to the sale, not solely on the sale.
• THE Florida BAR v. Riccardi
  304 So. 2d 444· Fla.· 1974-12-11 ·cited 4×
  The Florida Bar sought to enjoin and hold in contempt a disbarred attorney, Edward Riccardi, for unauthorized practice of law. The Florida Supreme Court found that Riccardi's participation as an advocate in a deposition and pretrial conference, coupled with representations of his
• Bures v. The Houston Symphony Soc'y
  503 F.2d 842· 5th Cir.· 1974-11-11 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court erred in granting a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury.
• Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Chicago
  502 F.2d 193· 7th Cir.· 1974-09-06 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) must determine whether its approval is required for the abandonment of railroad line operations under a trackage agreement before a court can adjudicate the dispute.
• Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Austin
  298 So. 2d 345· Fla.· 1974-07-17 ·cited 4×
  Greyhound Rent-A-Car sought review of a judgment for a used car purchaser (Austin) in a replevin action. The Florida Supreme Court discharged the writ of certiorari, finding no direct conflict with cited cases and holding that the Motor Credit Corporation v. Woolverton equitable
• Rohe v. Froehlke
  500 F.2d 113· 2d Cir.· 1974-07-03 ·cited 4×·via Request For Injunction
  The court held that the Army Regulation implicitly grants a reservist the right to be informed of and rebut adverse factual allegations made during an appeal of an involuntary active duty order.