Injunction

5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,126 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• C. F. Lytle Co. v. Clark
  491 F.2d 834· 10th Cir.· 1974-02-12 ·cited 8×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that the building permit expired by its terms and that the appellant's long cessation of construction constituted abandonment under the zoning resolution, thus affirming the denial of the injunction.
• Nieves v. Oswald
  498 F.2d 802· 2d Cir.· 1974-01-30 ·cited 8×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court should not declare the case moot based on the state's voluntary cessation of challenged conduct.
• The Nat'l Nutritional Foods Ass'n & Solgar Co., Inc. v. Caspar W. Weinberger
  491 F.2d 845· 2d Cir.· 1973-12-11 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction against FDA regulations concerning Vitamins A and D.
• Freitag v. Carter
  489 F.2d 1377· 7th Cir.· 1973-12-10 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the Commissioner's denial of a chauffeur's license without adequate notice and hearing violated due process, and that while the City of Chicago was improperly sued under § 1983, the Commissioner was liable for stipulated damages.
• The Guardians Ass'n OF the NEW York City Police Dep't, Inc. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n OF the City OF NEW York
  490 F.2d 400· 2d Cir.· 1973-11-21 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction against appointments from existing lists, finding the lists would soon be exhausted and all on them assured of speedy appointment. However, it instructed the district court to allow plaintiffs to review and comment on prop
• Citizens FOR A Better Env't, Inc. v. Nassau Cnty.
  488 F.2d 1353· 2d Cir.· 1973-11-14 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a likelihood of prevailing on the merits or irreparable harm, given the unresolved state law questions regarding the plaintiff orga
• Consumers OIL Corp. OF Trenton v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
  488 F.2d 816· 3d Cir.· 1973-11-12 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that federal courts should abstain from deciding a case involving interpretation of a state franchise act when substantial constitutional questions are raised and a state court interpretation might avoid those questions.
• Sarasota Cnty. v. Stanton Inv. Co. OF Mo.
  283 So. 2d 152· Fla. 2d DCA· 1973-09-26 ·cited 8×
  The appellate court reviewed a summary judgment granted to the owner, which required the county to revoke a temporary use permit issued to the owner's lessee.
• LA Chemise Lacoste v. Gen. Mills, Inc.
  487 F.2d 312· 3d Cir.· 1973-09-06 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the added corporations were not subject to compulsory joinder and that the denial of a preliminary injunction was proper.
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Radio Hill Mines Co., Ltd.
  479 F.2d 4· 2d Cir.· 1973-05-25 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court had the equitable power to order ancillary reporting requirements as part of a preliminary injunction under the Securities Acts, and that such requirements were not unconstitutional under the Fourth or Fifth Amendments in this context.
• Barr v. United States
  478 F.2d 1152· 10th Cir.· 1973-04-30 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the district court correctly dismissed the claims against all defendants, affirming the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, failure to state a claim, and failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
• State v. Barkdull
  277 So. 2d 15· Fla.· 1973-04-06 ·cited 8×·via Mandatory Injunction
  A Florida Supreme Court case in which Outrigger Club sought to prevent the District Court of Appeal from reconsidering zoning violations that the City of North Miami failed to raise in the initial trial. The Court held that the City was estopped from raising new defenses on reman
• United LOW Income, Inc. v. Dean Fisher, M.D.
  470 F.2d 1074· 1st Cir.· 1972-12-29 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the district court correctly declined to convene a three-judge court because the equal protection claim regarding the termination of AFDC-U benefits was not substantial, given existing Supreme Court precedent.
• Ungar v. Mandell
  471 F.2d 1163· 2d Cir.· 1972-12-06 ·cited 8×
  The denial of injunctive relief was affirmed, but the dismissal of the suit was reversed and remanded for further findings on collateral estoppel.
• Super Tire Eng'g Co. v. McCORKLE
  469 F.2d 911· 3d Cir.· 1972-11-22 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the case was not moot because the collective bargaining relationship is a continuing one, and the availability of state welfare benefits to strikers could still affect that relationship.
• Boston Prof'l Hockey Ass'n, Inc. v. Gerry Cheevers
  472 F.2d 127· 1st Cir.· 1972-10-10 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court remanded the case for further consideration of specific contract and arbitration issues, finding that new arguments were presented on appeal not addressed by the district court.
• Mason Wong v. Hayakawa
  464 F.2d 1282· 9th Cir.· 1972-08-09 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction because the disciplinary committee acted without substantial evidence.
• Transcon. GAS Pipe Line Corp. v. Hackensack Meadowlands Dev. Comm'n
  464 F.2d 1358· 3d Cir.· 1972-08-02 ·cited 8×
  The court affirmed the district court's decision, holding that the Commission's refusal to issue a building permit constituted an unlawful interference with interstate commerce.
• Nuclear-Chicago Corp. & Hal O. Anger v. Nuclear Data, Inc.
  465 F.2d 428· 7th Cir.· 1972-07-10 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  A finite market or the mere possibility of third-party competition does not, by itself, establish irreparable harm sufficient for a preliminary injunction when the defendant is solvent and capable of responding in money damages.
• Virgin Islands Hotel Ass'n (U. S.), Inc. v. Virgin Islands Water & Power Auth.
  465 F.2d 1272· 3d Cir.· 1972-06-28 ·cited 8×
  The court held that while rate-setting is generally discretionary, judicial review is available when an administrative body allegedly violates statutory duties or constitutional rights. The Authority failed to provide a meaningful public hearing as required by statute.
• Honolulu Rapid Transit Co. v. Lorrin M. Dolim
  459 F.2d 551· 9th Cir.· 1972-04-11 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the franchise terms did not constitute an unconstitutional taking of property without just compensation because the City's purchase was based on a bargained-for agreement, not eminent domain.
• Yablonski v. United Mine Workers OF Am.
  459 F.2d 1201· D.C. Cir.· 1972-03-17 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the death of the plaintiff and the completion of the union election did not render moot the claims for actual and punitive damages, nor the right of the plaintiff's heirs to continue the suit for those damages.
• In re Penn Cent. Transp. Co. v. Penn Cent. Transp. Co.
  457 F.2d 381· 3d Cir.· 1972-03-17 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction to continue operating the New York-Chatham passenger trains.
• Schooley v. Norden Wetstone and Marshall Wetstone
  258 So. 2d 483· Fla. 2d DCA· 1972-03-03 ·cited 8×
  The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a circuit court judgment requiring the Lee County Agricultural Zoning Board to classify the Wetstones' property as agricultural for 1970. The court held that landowners may directly challenge agricultural zoning board decisions via de
• Shatterproof Glass Corp. v. Buckmaster
  256 So. 2d 531· Fla. 2d DCA· 1972-01-05 ·cited 8×
  Shatterproof Glass Corporation appealed an interlocutory summary judgment order and final injunction enjoining it from using the trade name "National Glass Company" in Pinellas County. The court affirmed, holding that the domestic corporation (National Glass Company) was entitled
• Harlem River Consumers Coop., Inc. v. Associated Grocers OF Harlem, Inc.
  450 F.2d 271· 2d Cir.· 1971-10-07 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not err in granting a preliminary injunction against union officials and their associated businesses for violating the Sherman Act, and that the Norris-LaGuardia Act's "clear proof" requirement was met.
• City OF Coral Gables v. Sackett
  253 So. 2d 890· Fla. 3d DCA· 1971-09-28 ·cited 8×
  The City of Coral Gables appealed a trial court judgment that enjoined the city's rezoning approval as violating its own zoning code's one-year reconsideration restriction. The appellate court reversed, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove the initial February 9 rejection w
• United States v. City OF NEW Haven
  447 F.2d 972· 2d Cir.· 1971-08-31 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction against state court orders regulating aircraft flight and closing a runway, due to federal supremacy in navigable airspace.
• Lucia v. United States
  447 F.2d 912· 5th Cir.· 1971-08-23 ·cited 8×
• In re Penn Cent. Transp. Co.
  446 F.2d 1109· 3d Cir.· 1971-07-16 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the reorganization court did not abuse its discretion in enjoining litigation affecting train discontinuances and in denying leave to join the debtor in a separate action challenging labor protective provisions, as these actions were necessary to prevent inter
• Sword v. FOX
  446 F.2d 1091· 4th Cir.· 1971-07-01 ·cited 8×
  A state-supported college may constitutionally prohibit demonstrations within its buildings, provided the regulation is reasonable and does not discriminate.
• Pickell v. Commander W. C. Reed
  446 F.2d 898· 9th Cir.· 1971-06-21 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of the complaint and denial of a preliminary injunction, finding that the appellant failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
• Kennedy v. Teamsters
  443 F.2d 627· 9th Cir.· 1971-06-04 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the district court did not err in issuing an injunction under Section 10(f) of the NLRA, as its findings were not clearly erroneous and it had reasonable cause to believe an unfair labor practice occurred.
• Bradley v. Milliken
  438 F.2d 945· 6th Cir.· 1971-02-22 ·cited 8×·via Injunction Pending Appeal
  The court held that summary reversal is inappropriate without an evidentiary hearing on the alleged constitutional violations in the school system.
• Cerruti, Inc. v. McCRORY Corp.
  438 F.2d 281· 2d Cir.· 1971-02-08 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff had not met its burden of showing probability of success or irreparable injury, especially after the defendant's store closed.
• Ansted v. Resor
  437 F.2d 1020· 7th Cir.· 1971-01-29 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the absence of a personal hearing, right to counsel, or cross-examination in the Army's appeal process for involuntary active duty orders did not violate the reservist's constitutional rights or contractual obligations.
• Pvt. E2 Donald Jack Anderson v. Laird
  437 F.2d 912· 7th Cir.· 1971-01-14 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that while precedent generally refuses intervention in punitive activations of civilian-soldiers for hair length, the majority's reasoning regarding First and Ninth Amendment rights is flawed.
• Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. S. E. K. Constr. Co., Inc.
  436 F.2d 1345· 10th Cir.· 1971-01-12 ·cited 8×
  The court held that a surety cannot maintain an equitable action quia timet to prevent a bank from disposing of contract proceeds when the contractor was not in default, and that attorneys' fees are not recoverable under federal law for a wrongfully issued injunction bond in a di
• Mixing Equip. Co., Inc. v. Philadelphia Gear, Inc.
  436 F.2d 1308· 3d Cir.· 1971-01-11 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The dissenting judge would terminate the preliminary injunction and remand for a hearing on damages.
• Davis v. The Members OF Selective Serv. Bd. No. 30 OF Tex.
  433 F.2d 736· 5th Cir.· 1970-11-05 ·cited 8×
• Mass. Ave. Heights Citizens Ass'n v. Embassy Corp.
  433 F.2d 513· D.C. Cir.· 1970-07-16 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court denied the appellant's motion for immediate injunctive relief and summary reversal of the order denying a preliminary injunction.
• Gomez v. Wilson
  430 F.2d 495· D.C. Cir.· 1970-06-23 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint as moot because the complaint challenged the entire vagrancy statute, not just specific subsections, and the record lacked sufficient evidence to determine mootness.
• Dorfman v. Meiszner
  430 F.2d 558· 7th Cir.· 1970-06-19 ·cited 8×
  The court held that while district courts may prohibit photography and broadcasting in areas that disrupt judicial proceedings, the challenged rule was overbroad and violated the First Amendment by prohibiting conduct that did not threaten disruption.
• Univ. Hills, Inc. v. Patton
  427 F.2d 1094· 6th Cir.· 1970-06-15 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the purchase agreements and options did not contain explicit contractual use restrictions that would bind subsequent purchasers, and that zoning ordinances referenced in a deed were not intended to restrict land use. Therefore, appellants were not bound by the
• In re the Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum of Raymond J. Ryan
  430 F.2d 658· 9th Cir.· 1970-05-19 ·cited 8×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that the district court's order denying a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum, which also modified the subpoena and required affirmative action in a foreign country, was an appealable interlocutory order.
• Rowe v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co.
  421 F.2d 937· 4th Cir.· 1970-01-26 ·cited 8×·via Interlocutory Injunction
  The court held that the district court abused its discretion in denying the plaintiffs' motion to file an amended and supplemental complaint alleging an assignment of the insured's claim against the insurer for bad faith refusal to settle.
• In re Abraham v. Rochelle
  421 F.2d 226· 5th Cir.· 1970-01-19 ·cited 8×
  The Bankruptcy Court has summary jurisdiction over property in its actual or constructive possession, and its findings of possession and consent are subject to review only for plain error.
• Shultz v. Salinas
  416 F.2d 412· 5th Cir.· 1969-09-25 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the district court erred in denying an injunction against future child labor violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, despite finding no willful violation.
• Dade Cnty. Classroom Teachers' Ass'n, Inc. v. Nathan
  413 F.2d 1005· 5th Cir.· 1969-07-07 ·cited 8×
  The federal court affirmed the dismissal of the appellants' suit, finding that the federal questions raised had already been litigated and decided by the Florida Supreme Court.
• Brooks v. Nacrelli
  415 F.2d 272· 3d Cir.· 1969-06-25 ·cited 8×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint, as resisting a preliminary injunction motion does not automatically entitle a defendant to summary judgment without further opportunity for evidence.