Injunction For Protection

14 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• The Off. OF the State Attorney v. Parrotino
  628 So. 2d 1097· Fla.· 1993-12-02 ·cited 56×
  The Florida Supreme Court held that state attorneys are immune from civil liability for failing to seek an injunction for protection on behalf of a domestic violence victim, even where the victim relied on assurances that the state attorney would act and suffered fatal harm as a
• STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIM. CASES (95-1)
  657 So. 2d 1152· Fla.· 1995-07-13 ·cited 42×
  The Florida Supreme Court approved amendments to the Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, including new instructions for stalking offenses, modifications to sexual battery instructions, and clarifications regarding impeachment evidence and crimes against law enforcement
• Rollins v. Hon. Joseph P. Baker
  683 So. 2d 1138· Fla. 5th DCA· 1996-12-13 ·cited 21×
  A judge's ex parte communications and gratuitous comments can create a well-grounded fear of bias, necessitating disqualification.
• In re Standard Jury Instructions IN Crim. Cases-Report NO. 2012-05
  131 So. 3d 755· Fla.· 2013-12-05 ·cited 19×
  The Florida Supreme Court authorized new and amended standard criminal jury instructions for use in criminal trials, declining to authorize one instruction on sexual battery due to insufficient legal authority and lack of proper citation, while amending another instruction on agg
• Richardson v. Celveta Lewis
  639 So. 2d 1098· Fla. 2d DCA· 1994-07-20 ·cited 10×
  The court held that prosecution for indirect criminal contempt after conviction for armed trespass and aggravated battery does not violate double jeopardy because the offenses contain different elements.
• Koshel v. State
  659 So. 2d 232· Fla.· 1995-04-27 ·cited 6×
• Hoffman v. State
  842 So. 2d 895· Fla. 2d DCA· 2003-02-12 ·cited 5×
  Judy Hoffman appeals her conviction for violating an injunction for protection, arguing the State presented insufficient evidence. The Florida appellate court agrees and reverses, finding the State failed to prove both alleged violations beyond a reasonable doubt.
• Amendments to Fla. Supreme Court Approved Fam. Law Forms-Domestic Violence
  849 So. 2d 1003· Fla.· 2003-05-15 ·cited 4×
  The Florida Supreme Court adopted and amended family law forms addressing domestic violence, repeat violence, and dating violence to comport with 2002 legislative amendments that modified statutory definitions, required recording of proceedings, added prohibited conduct violation
• Taylor v. Price
  273 So. 3d 24· Fla. 4th DCA· 2019-05-22 ·cited 3×
  In this domestic violence case, the wife appeals the trial court's dismissal of her petition for protection against domestic violence. The appellate court reversed the dismissal, finding that the trial court erred by rejecting uncontroverted testimony without making credibility f
• Fulton Q. Griffith v. State
  922 So. 2d 436· Fla. 2d DCA· 2006-03-10 ·cited 1×
  Fulton Griffith appealed the denial of his two postconviction relief motions after the trial court abruptly terminated his evidentiary hearing. The appellate court reversed and remanded because Griffith was denied a full and fair hearing to present his case and the trial court im
• In re Amendments TO the Fla. Supreme Court Approved Fam. LAW Forms-12.980(B)(1).
  246 So. 3d 1161· Fla.· 2018-06-21
  The Florida Supreme Court amended Form 12.980(b)(1), an order setting hearing on petitions for injunctions for protection against domestic violence, repeat violence, dating violence, sexual violence, and stalking. The amendment clarifies courts' obligations to record domestic vio
• In re Amendments to the Fla. Fam. Law Rules of Procedure
  905 So. 2d 865· Fla.· 2005-06-02
  The Florida Supreme Court adopted amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure to implement 2004 legislation expanding causes of action for injunctions to include dating violence and sexual violence, amending the fee schedule for court-ordered mediation services, and r
• Saliva v. Nolin
  884 So. 2d 1075· Fla. 2d DCA· 2004-10-15
  The appeal is moot because the ex parte temporary injunction for protection has expired.
• Foust v. Brown
  576 So. 2d 939· Fla. 5th DCA· 1991-03-28