-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-27
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction because they failed to meet the required legal standard and procedural rules.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2023-11-22
A temporary injunction is defective and reversible when the trial court fails to set a bond as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b), and on remand the court must set an appropriate bond after providing all parties an opportunity to present evidence on the proper a
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-07
Head Kandy LLC sued former officer Kayla McNeill in federal court in Florida for allegedly misappropriating company funds through fraudulent expense reimbursements, unauthorized payroll charges, and disparaging statements that harmed the business. The court granted in part and de
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-06-21
A temporary injunction against a non-party fails to comply with Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.605 when it lacks a required bond and fails to specify reasons for entry, and must be reversed and remanded where the non-party was not afforded an adequate opportunity to be h
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2023-03-31
A trial court must make factual findings in its order granting a temporary injunction and must require the applicant to post a bond as prescribed by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b)–(c).
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2023-03-31
-
Del. Ch.·
2023-03-22
The Court of Chancery found that the Agreement between the parties constituted an enforceable license to use the property, not a contract for the sale of real property, due to a lack of definite terms. The Court further held that the license was revoked by the matriarch in 2001,
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2022-10-14
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2022-08-10
-
Del. Ch.·
2022-08-01
The court held that neither party breached the agreement governing the sale of the entity that owned the apartments, and the Holtzman Parties failed to establish damages. The court also found that the Holtzman Parties lacked standing to assert other claims and failed to establish
-
Del. Ch.·
2022-08-01
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, requiring the defendants to continue providing services under the Transition Services Agreement (TSA). This relief was conditioned upon the plaintiffs posting a $2.8 million monthly surety bond. The court foun
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2022-04-08
The appellate court reviewed a nonfinal order granting a temporary injunction. While the trial court had a basis for the injunction, it erred by failing to require the movant to post a bond as mandated by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b).
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2021-08-25
Attorney's fees awarded as damages under section 60.07 for wrongful injunction must be restricted to services rendered in dissolving the injunction and cannot include fees incurred in demonstrating entitlement to attorney's fees.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-16
The court held that Pinnacle was not entitled to recover on the injunction bond because it was not wrongfully enjoined, and granted Pinnacle's motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of Florida.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-10-21
The Florida Supreme Court discharged a writ of certiorari, finding it improvidently issued, as there was no conflict between appellate decisions concerning the zoning of Mayflower Property's land.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-10-21
A condominium association is entitled to a mandatory injunction to access a unit owner's balcony for restoration work, but the circuit court erred in failing to require a bond under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b) as a condition of the injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-07-06
The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff's delay in seeking relief created the emergency and they failed to meet the requirements for either form of injunction.
-
Del. Ch.·
2020-05-20
The court granted Buckeye's request for a preliminary injunction, enjoining GT from preventing Buckeye and its customers from accessing the Tanks via Sico Road pending the outcome of the litigation. The court found that Buckeye had a reasonable probability of success on its claim
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-02-25
PETA sued a Florida zoo (Dade City's Wild Things) alleging violations of the Endangered Species Act through improper treatment of tigers, but after the zoo owners deliberately transferred all their tigers away from the facility in violation of court-ordered discovery obligations,
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2019-03-13
This case involves a judgment creditor seeking to collect a large debt by filing notices of lis pendens against properties allegedly transferred fraudulently by the debtor. The appellate court reviewed several related non-final orders concerning the discharge of these notices, ju
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2019-03-13
This case involves a judgment creditor seeking to collect a large debt by filing notices of lis pendens against properties allegedly transferred fraudulently by the debtor. The appellate court reviewed several related non-final orders concerning the discharge of these notices, ju
-
260 So. 3d 1191·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2019-01-07
When a trial judge becomes aware of grounds for recusal at or before a hearing but issues a substantive order after that awareness, the order must be vacated and the matter remanded for a new hearing before an impartial judge.
-
265 So. 3d 446·
Fla.·
2018-10-04
-
Del. Ch.·
2018-01-23
The Court of Chancery denied the plaintiff's application for attorneys' fees. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish causation between its lawsuit and the price reduction, as the defendants successfully rebutted the presumption of causation by demonstrating the re
-
207 So. 3d 331·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2016-11-23
Aligned Bayshore Marina appeals a trial court's temporary injunction order. The court quashes the injunction because it fails to comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610, specifically by lacking required factual findings explaining the reasons for entry and failing to re
-
118 So. 3d 238·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2013-07-10
-
Del. Ch.·
2011-03-04
The Court granted a preliminary injunction enjoining the shareholder vote on the proposed merger between Atheros Communications, Inc. and T. Merger Sub, Inc. The injunction is conditioned upon the plaintiffs posting a $25,000 bond and will be lifted upon Atheros's distribution of
-
26 So. 3d 636·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2010-01-08
The State of Florida appealed a judgment awarding damages to Bradenton Group, Inc. for a wrongful temporary injunction obtained in 1995 without a bond that shut down the company's bingo hall operations. The court affirmed the judgment, rejecting the State's claims of sovereign an
-
Del. Ch.·
2009-12-22
The Court held that Article V of the Deed Restrictions, which governs the approval of building plans, does not grant the homeowners association authority to regulate the complete demolition of a house where no replacement structure is planned. Consequently, the homeowners associa
-
674 F. Supp. 2d 1360·
S.D. Fla.·
2009-12-16
The court held that Bank of America is entitled to attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses under the Florida UCC and the parties' contract, and that Agricultural Bank of China is entitled to the injunction bond proceeds.
-
966 So. 2d 976·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2007-08-31
Brian Patrick Barrett appeals from two injunction orders entered against him based on alleged breach of a Marital Settlement Agreement. The appellate court reversed the temporary injunction for lack of proper procedural requirements and remanded the permanent injunction for corre
-
849 So. 2d 1102·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2003-05-28
In this divorce appeal, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal addressed whether a trial court had personal jurisdiction over a husband who absconded to Brazil with the parties' child. The court held that while service of process was defective, the judgment dissolving the mar
-
794 So. 2d 609·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2001-01-31
The court held that while the temporary injunction was properly granted, the trial court erred by setting the bond amount without an evidentiary hearing to allow parties to present evidence on costs and damages.
-
750 So. 2d 757·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2000-02-04
The appellate court reversed a trial court's order granting temporary alimony and a temporary injunction because the payor spouse was not given an adequate opportunity to present evidence. The court emphasized the importance of due process in such financial determinations.
-
738 So. 2d 1032·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1999-08-31
The court held that the trial court erred in entering a temporary injunction based on an unverified petition and without a bond.
-
735 So. 2d 586·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1999-06-25
-
962 F.2d 520·
5th Cir.·
1992-06-10
A third-party beneficiary to an injunction bond is entitled to recover attorney's fees under Texas law, even if not a direct party to the bond.
-
582 So. 2d 152·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1991-07-10
The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a preliminary injunction against appellants Ross and Professional Data Resources for violating a non-competition agreement with Champion Computer Corporation, but reversed and remanded the trial court's decision to enforce a contractua
-
824 F.2d 765·
9th Cir.·
1987-08-11
The district court had jurisdiction to order restitution of front pay after the initial judgment was reversed, as restitution is an equitable remedy consistent with the appellate mandate.
-
820 F.2d 76·
1st Cir.·
1987-05-29
The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to support the district court's order holding the surety liable on the injunction bond, as the obligee failed to prove damages directly attributable to the injunction.
-
373 So. 2d 438·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1979-07-31
Florida appellate court reviewed a lower court's denial of a motion to discharge a lis pendens filed against a condominium project. The court held that a lis pendens may not be filed against property when the complaint seeks only money damages or creditor relief without asserting
-
330 So. 2d 501·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1976-04-15
The court held that the interlocutory order enjoining the sale of a note was improper because it violated procedural rules for injunctions.
-
389 F.2d 892·
9th Cir.·
1968-01-30
The court held that the exoneration of injunction bonds operates prospectively and does not extinguish liability for damages sustained due to the injunction if the plaintiff was not entitled to it. The trial court's findings on liability and damages were supported by competent ev
-
17 Fla. Supp. 31·
Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1960-11-28
Surf Club, Inc. challenged a $25,282.08 sales tax assessment by Florida's Comptroller, arguing the club was not engaged in taxable business activities. The court found the club was a membership organization whose members were equitable owners, not a retailer or dealer subject to
-
7 Fla. Supp. 164·
Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.·
1955-05-20
A Miami Beach hotel sought a preliminary injunction against a union and its officers to halt picketing and an unauthorized strike. The circuit court granted the injunction, finding that the union-organized strike lacked majority employee authorization under Florida law and that t
-
160 Fla. 773·
Fla.·
1948-07-30