-
563 F.2d 1019·
Ct. Cl.·
1977-10-19
·cited 2×
The court held that an assignment of a claim against the United States is void under the Anti-Assignment Act if it lacks attesting witnesses and proper documentation, and that even if valid, the funds at issue were community property subject to the husband's debts under Californi
-
495 F.2d 737·
9th Cir.·
1974-04-09
·cited 2×
The court held that the majority's reliance on latent equity and Poggi was misplaced, and that the case should be remanded for findings on unjust enrichment.
-
386 F.2d 885·
Ct. Cl.·
1967-11-09
·cited 2×
The court held that the plaintiff subcontractor could not recover from the United States based on alleged oral promises made by an RFC manager, as RFC's contractual relationship was solely with the prime contractor.
-
386 F.2d 898·
Ct. Cl.·
1967-11-09
·cited 2×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a contract implied in fact with the government, and therefore, the government was not liable for the plaintiff's losses.
-
288 F.2d 386·
D.C. Cir.·
1961-02-09
·cited 2×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a basis for relief on claims of unjust enrichment, implied-in-fact contract, or express oral contract.
-
397 So. 3d 1133·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2024-10-25
·cited 1×
A party cannot recover under unjust enrichment when it voluntarily conferred an unrequested benefit before obtaining a promise of counter-performance and acted from self-interested motives during contract negotiations. The officious intermeddler doctrine bars recovery where preco
-
2022 WL 471213·
S.D. Fla.·
2022-05-23
·cited 1×
The court held that the university's contract terms unambiguously allowed for a shift to online instruction, but did not unambiguously permit the closure of campus facilities and services.
-
187 So. 3d 951·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2016-03-24
·cited 1×
The court held that a statutory employer must have sublet 'contract work' to a subcontractor, and the absence of evidence of a contractual obligation to a third party prevents application of workers' compensation immunity.
-
104 So. 3d 1217·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2012-12-17
·cited 1×
A truck driver injured in a motor vehicle accident during a mandatory two-day orientation session appealed a workers' compensation denial based on the argument that he was not yet an employee. The Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the claimant was an e
-
82 So. 3d 950·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2011-08-04
·cited 1×
The Sheppards appealed a trial court order awarding M & R Plumbing costs and attorneys' fees following a dispute over a water treatment system installation. The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the costs award but reversed the attorneys' fees award, holding that because no
-
459 F. Supp. 2d 1269·
S.D. Fla.·
2006-09-22
·cited 1×
The court held that the plaintiff's state law claims for breach of contract and declaratory relief were not completely preempted by ERISA, and therefore, federal jurisdiction was not established.
-
340 F. Supp. 2d 1320·
M.D. Fla.·
2004-10-08
·cited 1×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and that the university had legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for its disciplinary actions. The court also declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction
-
961 F.2d 951·
Fed. Cir.·
1992-04-14
·cited 1×
The court held that prototype development expenses incurred after proposal submission may be recoverable as proposal preparation costs if they were incurred pursuant to ongoing negotiations and in support of a revised proposal, provided they are reasonable and allocable.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2026-05-08
DeLesline's answer containing general denials does not raise unpled affirmative defenses, and the trial court properly entered judgment against Nuce based on Nuce's failure to prove its claims.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-03
Two Miami-based prop rental companies sued a church and media ministry over an unpaid $1.25 million contract to fabricate and install a large stage prop, after the defendants failed to make timely installment payments as agreed. The court found the defendants materially breached
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-11
The court held that a plaintiff has plausibly alleged the elements of a contract implied in fact, and the pre-existing duty rule does not bar consideration at the motion to dismiss stage in this statutory context.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2025-08-29
The court granted summary judgment for the defendants on the breach of contract claim, finding no evidence of an express or implied contract regarding the cost of the surgery. However, the court denied summary judgment on the negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distr
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-06-02
Reel Games, Inc. brought claims for breach of contract, account stated, open account, and declaratory relief against Euro Game Technology, Ltd. and related entities, arising from licensing and debt settlement agreements for distributing gaming machines in the United States. The c
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-05-28
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, denying both parties' motions for summary judgment.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2025-05-14
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of all counts. The court held that the declaratory judgment claims were either duplicative of other claims or lacked an actual case or controversy and standing because the plaintiff had withdrawn from the transaction. The C
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2025-03-31
The court denied the motion to dismiss the breach of contract claims against Worldwide, finding the profit-sharing provision of the employment agreement to be ambiguous and susceptible to multiple reasonable interpretations. However, the court granted the motion to dismiss the Pe
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-06
The court held that Plaintiff plausibly alleged a violation of the Florida Security of Communications Act (FSCA) and denied the motion to dismiss that claim, while also finding the Wiretap Act claim potentially viable under the crime-tort exception.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-09-16
The court held that the Airline Deregulation Act preempts the plaintiff's civil theft claim and, as pled, its quantum meruit claim, but grants leave to amend the quantum meruit claim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-08-28
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim on any count and dismissed the complaint, granting leave to amend for some claims.
-
390 So. 3d 241·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2024-05-22
A broker is not the procuring cause of a real estate sale when it abandons efforts to sell to a particular buyer after that buyer's offer is rejected and does not remain involved in subsequent negotiations, even if the same buyer later purchases the property through another broke
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-01-16
The court held that a healthcare provider cannot establish a direct benefit to an insurer for unjust enrichment and that pre-approvals do not create a promise to pay a specific amount for promissory estoppel.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-30
The court held that genuine disputes of material fact preclude summary judgment on the breach of oral contract claim due to disagreements over the contract price and performance. The court also found that the unjust enrichment claim could proceed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-09-26
The court held that the parties entered into an enforceable settlement agreement, denying the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting the defendant's motion for partial summary judgment on its breach of contract counterclaim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-09-22
The court held that the parties entered into an oral contract for the defendant to temporarily hold inheritance funds, and the defendant breached this contract by failing to return the money upon request.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-02
An implied-in-fact contract may arise out of an express contract where a contractor or subcontractor performs extras not covered by the original contract, and the elements of exhaustion of remedies and non-payment by the owner are required only for implied-in-law claims, not impl
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2023-08-02
The appellate court affirmed a lower court's decision that an implied contract existed between a property owner and a subcontractor, even though express contracts existed between the owner and a general contractor, and the general contractor and the subcontractor. The court clari
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-23
The court held that the plaintiff failed to plead sufficient facts to allege a contract for separately itemized fees in exchange for access to campus activities, facilities, resources, and services, and thus dismissed the breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-02-28
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation, finding that the plaintiff's state-law claims were not preempted by ERISA and that the plaintiff adequately alleged an implied-in-fact contract.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-12-14
Plaintiff Ashley Allen, a Jacksonville University student, sued the school for breaching implied contracts to provide in-person instruction, campus access, and on-campus services during the 2020 spring semester when JU moved classes online and closed campus facilities in response
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-04-20
The court held that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant because the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient contacts with Florida under the state's long-arm statute and due process requirements.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-04-14
The court held that venue was proper and that the plaintiff's allegations were sufficient to state claims for breach of express and implied contract, thus denying the motion to dismiss.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-08-13
The court conditionally certified the ADEA claim as a collective action but denied class certification for the state law claims.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-11-29
The court held that the plaintiff sufficiently pleaded claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment, denying the defendant university's motion to dismiss.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-06-30
The court held that Chiron's claims brought via power of attorney were dismissed due to lack of standing and shotgun pleading, and claims based on invalid assignments were dismissed, while claims based on valid assignments and Chiron's individual claims survived.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-03-05
The court held that Plaintiff's claims were not completely preempted by ERISA because Plaintiff lacked standing under ERISA due to an invalid assignment of benefits, thus the first prong of the Davila test was not met.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2020-03-05
The court affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of the defendant, finding no enforceable contract existed and that the defendant's actions did not constitute a breach or unjust enrichment. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish an implied-in-fact distributio
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2018-12-28
The trial court departed from essential requirements of law by excluding the Maceiras affidavit under the parol evidence rule when it was offered to prove good faith intent in filing the lien, a separate inquiry from contract interpretation. The trial court also erred in finding
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2018-12-28
The trial court departed from essential requirements of law by excluding the Maceiras affidavit under the parol evidence rule when it was offered to prove good faith intent in filing the lien, a separate inquiry from contract interpretation. The trial court also erred in finding
-
Del. Ch.·
2015-01-14
The Delaware Court of Chancery granted the defendants' motions to dismiss, finding that the plaintiff failed to perfect jurisdiction over the individual defendants and failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The court held that the plaintiff's allegations did
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2013-10-07
The court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that the defendants breached their contractual obligations under the Termination Agreements by failing to make commission payments. The court also found that the defendants failed to establish their defense of
-
832 F. Supp. 2d 1222·
S.D. Fla.·
2013-09-12
The court held that AT&T Defendants' motion to dismiss contract and statutory claims is denied because the click-through agreement cannot be considered at this stage, but the unjust enrichment claim against them is dismissed. The Diamond Defendants' motion to dismiss contract and
-
850 F. Supp. 2d 653·
S.D. Fla.·
2013-02-04
The liability waiver signed by the passenger is unenforceable under 46 U.S.C. § 30509 because it attempts to limit the cruise line's liability for negligence. Royal Caribbean is not exonerated from liability for failing to provide a competent jet ski operator, and its liability i
-
Del. Ch.·
2012-07-18
The court held that the defendants, Walters, Aylor, and Environmental Solutions Group, Inc. (New Environmental), are liable to the plaintiff, Envo, Inc., under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. The court found that the defendants made misrepresentations regarding the existence
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2010-04-22
The court denied in part and granted in part the defendant's motion to dismiss. The claims for breach of express contract and equitable estoppel were allowed to proceed, while the claims for breach of implied contract and quantum meruit were dismissed. The court found that while
-
382 F. Supp. 2d 1334·
M.D. Fla.·
2005-05-19
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish that government agents had implied actual authority to contractually obligate the government for additional work, thus summary judgment for the government was granted.