-
849 F.2d 74·
2d Cir.·
1988-06-10
·cited 8×
Police officers are entitled to absolute immunity for testimony given at pretrial adversary proceedings, extending the immunity granted for trial testimony.
-
811 F.2d 401·
8th Cir.·
1987-02-04
·cited 8×
The court should not blindly accord absolute immunity to all federal defendants or SEMO defendants for alleged constitutional violations.
-
894 F.2d 949·
7th Cir.·
1990-02-06
·cited 6×
-
815 F.2d 1433·
11th Cir.·
1987-05-04
·cited 6×
Federal prosecutors are absolutely immune from civil liability for damages when providing information to the Parole Commission, as this activity is intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process.
-
659 F.2d 374·
3d Cir.·
1981-09-15
·cited 6×
The court held that the district court should address the prosecutor's immunity defense in the first instance, and that the case should be remanded for further proceedings.
-
568 F.2d 117·
8th Cir.·
1978-01-17
·cited 6×
The court held that appellants' civil rights claims were barred by prosecutorial immunity, abstention doctrines, and failure to allege class-based animus.
-
872 F.2d 571·
4th Cir.·
1989-03-07
·cited 4×
A state bar disciplinary proceeding against a federal officer for acts performed under color of office is removable to federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442, and a district court's remand order based on state interest in professional licensure is reviewable and erroneous.
-
531 F.2d 765·
5th Cir.·
1976-05-14
·cited 4×
A sheriff is shielded by qualified immunity in § 1983 false imprisonment suits, requiring a determination of good faith and reasonableness, not an outright dismissal.
-
962 F.2d 501·
5th Cir.·
1992-06-08
·cited 2×
The court held that the district court did not err in denying Officer Wall's motion for summary judgment based on qualified or absolute immunity, as material fact questions remained regarding the alleged constitutional violations and state tort claims.
-
921 F.2d 1032·
10th Cir.·
1990-12-11
The court held that the exclusion of testimony regarding county custom was not error because the appellant lacked a protected property interest, and directed verdicts for the assistant district attorney and neighbor were proper as no constitutional rights were violated.
-
863 F.2d 29·
8th Cir.·
1988-12-14
Prosecutors are entitled to absolute immunity for damages claims arising from their role in initiating prosecution and presenting the state's case, even if they allegedly withheld exculpatory evidence.