-
579 So. 2d 320·
Fla. 5th DCA·
1991-05-09
·cited 8×
Property owners challenged special assessments levied by the City of Palm Bay for a city-wide street resurfacing program. The court held that special assessments may not be used to fund general maintenance of all city streets because such improvements do not provide benefits to a
-
875 F.2d 781·
9th Cir.·
1989-05-30
·cited 8×
-
867 F.2d 240·
5th Cir.·
1989-03-08
·cited 8×
The court held that the FDIC is protected by 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e) from a borrower's claim that a deed of trust is void under state law, when that claim relies on an undisclosed side agreement.
-
536 So. 2d 1148·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1988-12-28
·cited 8×
The City of Gainesville Code Enforcement Board appealed the dismissal of its statutory lien foreclosure complaint against a property owner who had failed to pay liens imposed for code violations. The court reversed, holding that the complaint stated a valid cause of action under
-
528 So. 2d 63·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1988-07-05
·cited 8×
Baum sued Heiman for defaulting on a $40,000 loan and obtained a judgment that was satisfied from proceeds of a condominium sale. Heiman later successfully challenged the sale through probate proceedings establishing the property as her husband's homestead, then sued Baum for res
-
754 F.2d 1490·
9th Cir.·
1985-03-05
·cited 8×
A state that opts out of the federal bankruptcy exemption scheme and provides its own exemptions is not bound by 11 U.S.C. § 522(m) regarding those state-provided exemptions.
-
411 So. 2d 330·
Fla. 5th DCA·
1982-03-24
·cited 8×
Florida homeowners challenged a five-year durational residency requirement for an enhanced homestead tax exemption as violating equal protection and due process rights. The court affirmed the statute's constitutionality, finding the rational basis test rather than strict scrutiny
-
649 F.2d 1117·
5th Cir.·
1981-07-06
·cited 8×
The Fifth Circuit held that a federal tax lien cannot be foreclosed against a Texas homestead when one spouse has no tax liability and Texas law treats the homestead interest as a property right, not merely an exemption.
-
621 F.2d 148·
5th Cir.·
1980-07-09
·cited 8×
The court held that the Elzea decision, finding the assignment of a homestead exemption to be a security interest requiring TILA disclosure, should be applied retroactively because the bank failed to meet any of the Chevron tests for prospective application.
-
342 So. 2d 88·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1977-01-28
·cited 8×
The homestead exemption does not prohibit a court-ordered partition sale of indivisible property owned by co-tenants, even if one co-tenant occupies it as a homestead.
-
341 So. 2d 247·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1976-12-29
·cited 8×
Marine Bank & Trust Company obtained a judgment lien against Edward R. Hamm recorded with an erroneous middle initial (Edward P. Hamm). The Sackheims subsequently purchased Hamm's property as homestead. The trial court held the lien valid but unenforceable due to homestead status
-
497 F.2d 135·
5th Cir.·
1974-07-05
·cited 8×
The court held that the debtors did not abandon their Florida homestead exemption despite a temporary absence due to marital discord and reconciliation efforts.
-
379 F.2d 682·
10th Cir.·
1967-06-23
·cited 8×
The court held that transactions intended to defraud creditors, even if involving homestead property, can be set aside as fraudulent and preferential under the Bankruptcy Act.
-
292 F.2d 259·
10th Cir.·
1961-06-23
·cited 8×
The court held that a bankruptcy referee has jurisdiction to revoke a discharge order, even if no formal objections were filed, for good cause shown. The referee did not abuse discretion by vacating the discharge pending a state court determination of a homestead exemption waiver
-
63 So. 2d 297·
Fla.·
1953-02-27
·cited 8×
In this homestead property dispute, the Florida Supreme Court held that an adopted child who had not lived with his adoptive parents for over two years and was not dependent on them had no homestead rights in their property. The court affirmed the lower court's decision that the
-
195 F.2d 717·
9th Cir.·
1952-03-22
·cited 8×
A bankrupt waives their right to a homestead exemption by failing to schedule the property and by conveying it, even if the conveyance is later set aside as fraudulent.
-
160 Fla. 707·
Fla.·
1948-07-20
·cited 8×
The court held that the chancellor erred in striking paragraphs detailing claims for support and payments made on the homestead, as the chosen remedy of accounting in a partition suit was permissible and more expeditious than foreclosing a lien.
-
140 F.2d 76·
4th Cir.·
1944-01-10
·cited 8×
The bankruptcy court had jurisdiction to adjudicate the controversy because the parties consented, and the bankrupt and his trustee are bound by the prior settlement agreement and court orders.
-
137 Fla. 629·
Fla.·
1939-05-12
·cited 8×
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a decree validating refunding bonds issued by the City of Inverness, holding that statutory amendments permitting unlimited tax levies for debt service were effective to authorize refunding of older limited-tax bonds, and that refunding bonds co
-
108 Fla. 442·
Fla.·
1933-02-23
·cited 8×
The Florida Supreme Court granted a motion to quash a writ of certiorari, affirming a lower court's decision that the defendant was the head of a family entitled to homestead exemption. The court found the evidence sufficient to support this finding.
-
44 Fla. 551·
Fla.·
1902-06-01
·cited 8×
In this ejectment action, the Florida Supreme Court reversed judgment against the administrator and heir of a deceased defendant because the lower court improperly sustained demurrers to pleas questioning whether the administrator and the widow were necessary and proper parties t
-
160 So. 3d 94·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2015-03-11
·cited 7×
The court held that a judgment debtor's investment of homestead sale proceeds into mutual funds and unit investment trusts did not forfeit the protected status of those proceeds.
-
153 So. 3d 341·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2014-12-16
·cited 7×
A husband sought to intervene in foreclosure proceedings against his wife's home after a summary judgment was entered without his knowledge or participation. The court held that although the husband was not an original party, he had a sufficient legal and beneficial interest in t
-
921 So. 2d 681·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2006-01-25
·cited 7×
The Willises and Giacomino appealed a judgment finding them liable for fraudulent transfers of corporate assets and imposing an equitable lien on the Willises' homestead property. The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the fraudulent transfer liability but reversed the impo
-
912 So. 2d 649·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2005-09-21
·cited 7×
Benjamin Partridge appeals a foreclosure judgment on an equitable lien placed on his homestead property to satisfy unpaid spousal support obligations. The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirms, holding that homestead property can be subject to foreclosure through an equitable l
-
705 So. 2d 704·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1998-02-11
·cited 7×
Jose Lisboa, a legal immigrant with pending political asylum status classified as PRUCOL (permanently residing under color of law), appealed the denial of his homestead tax exemption. The Florida Third District Court of Appeal held that PRUCOL status satisfies the permanent resid
-
647 So. 2d 1064·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1994-12-28
·cited 7×
The appellate court reversed a trial court order that reopened an estate and determined that real property, previously devised to a trust and found to have lost its homestead status, was still protected homestead for a beneficiary, holding that the property had indeed lost its ho
-
967 F.2d 1316·
9th Cir.·
1992-06-22
·cited 7×
A bankruptcy trustee may sell a debtor's homestead if the sale price exceeds the homestead exemption amount plus any liens and encumbrances, and post-petition appreciation of the homestead accrues to the bankruptcy estate, not the debtor.
-
581 So. 2d 586·
Fla.·
1991-07-03
·cited 7×
The Court held that the initiative petition and its proposed ballot summary comply with the single-subject requirement of the Florida Constitution and the statutory requirements for ballot summaries.
-
652 F. Supp. 1409·
S.D. Fla.·
1987-02-05
·cited 7×
The court held that the Uhligs' residence, even if used for business, is protected by homestead exemption, and the separate office building's status requires further factual determination.
-
487 So. 2d 1099·
Fla. 5th DCA·
1986-03-27
·cited 7×
The court affirmed a partition sale of the marital residence, holding that the wife's claim of homestead exemption did not preclude partition when she was uncooperative in selling or renting the home after the youngest child reached majority.
-
140 So. 2d 876·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1962-05-15
·cited 7×
The court held that a conveyance of homestead property by a husband without his wife's joinder is void, and the homestead descends according to statutory provisions, not by will.
-
119 So. 2d 398·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1960-03-14
·cited 7×
The Abernatys obtained a judgment against Carolyn Gruppo and levied on her home. Gruppo claimed homestead exemption, but the court held that because her deceased husband (not she) was the head of the family during his lifetime, the property was not exempt from execution. The cour
-
106 So. 2d 622·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1958-11-18
·cited 7×
Isaac Gaston appealed the trial court's denial of his application to be declared insolvent for purposes of appealing his criminal conviction at public expense. The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the trial court improperly considered the combined family in
-
48 Fla. 205·
Fla.·
1904-06-01
·cited 7×
The Florida Supreme Court held that John Clark, a deceased homeowner, qualified as the head of a family entitled to homestead exemption from creditors' claims, even though his household included his granddaughter (whom he had informally adopted and supported from infancy) rather
-
214 So. 3d 683·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2017-03-08
·cited 6×
Appellant challenges a foreclosure judgment on her homestead property, arguing it is exempt from forced sale. The court affirms the foreclosure of a $206,000 equitable lien securing mortgage payments appellant made from her parents' property proceeds, but reverses and remands reg
-
149 So. 3d 85·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2014-09-03
·cited 6×
A married homeowner challenged the denial of a homestead property tax exemption on his Broward County residence on the ground that he and his wife established separate family units, each entitled to one exemption. The Florida appellate court affirmed that an intact marriage const
-
106 So. 3d 475·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2012-12-19
·cited 6×
The Spikes appealed a trial court decision imposing an equitable subrogation lien on their homestead and granting foreclosure. The court affirmed the subrogation lien but reversed to require an equitable vendor's lien for the full purchase money loan amount, holding that homestea
-
63 So. 3d 783·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2011-03-16
·cited 6×
The Third District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's denial of a motion to vacate a sheriff's sale of homestead property, holding that both the ex-wife Carmen and ex-husband Evaristo maintained homestead interests in the marital residence that were exempt from forced sal
-
43 So. 3d 654·
Fla.·
2010-08-31
·cited 6×
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a trial court's decision to remove Amendment 3 from the November 2010 ballot, finding that the ballot title and summary were misleading and failed to clearly inform voters of the amendment's chief purpose regarding homestead tax exemptions. The
-
682 F. Supp. 2d 1312·
S.D. Fla.·
2010-01-22
·cited 6×
The court found the defendant in civil contempt for failing to comply with the final judgment, as his claimed inability to pay was self-created through dissipation of assets.
-
980 So. 2d 1210·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2008-04-30
·cited 6×
Elena Randazzo appeals the trial court's order imposing an equitable lien on her homestead property for her failure to pay $190,000 in equitable distribution to her former husband as required by their marital settlement agreement. The court affirmed, holding that egregious conduc
-
963 So. 2d 940·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2007-09-05
·cited 6×
The Town of Lake Park appeals a trial court order awarding foreclosure sale surplus to former homeowners the Grimeses, claiming entitlement to the funds for code enforcement liens. The court reverses, holding that while homestead property itself is protected from code enforcement
-
849 So. 2d 15·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2003-03-18
·cited 6×
A party cannot use an amended pleading to add a claim for a subsequent tax year if that claim is time-barred by a statute of non-claim.
-
779 So. 2d 629·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2001-03-08
·cited 6×
The Florida Department of Revenue appealed a trial court judgment that prohibited it from levying on funds in a child support obligor's credit union account. The court held that funds obtained from a commercial mortgage loan are not exempt from child support levy merely because t
-
750 So. 2d 717·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2000-01-21
·cited 6×
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order temporarily modifying alimony and ordering the sale of the former husband's homestead property, despite the former husband's appeal arguing for further reduction or suspension of alimony.
-
750 So. 2d 676·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1999-12-22
·cited 6×
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order finding that a former wife's homestead property was not subject to her former attorney's charging lien.
-
740 So. 2d 594·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1999-09-01
·cited 6×
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed that judgment liens obtained by banks do not attach to the proceeds of a homestead sale, even when proceeds are used to satisfy a second mortgage obtained for non-homestead purposes. The court held that homestead protection extends to
-
719 So. 2d 1264·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1998-11-04
·cited 6×
The Prietos sought declaratory judgment that their homestead property was exempt from a judgment lien recorded by Eastern National Bank. The lower court dismissed the action, but the bank conceded error on appeal, and the court reversed, holding that judgment debtors have the rig
-
687 So. 2d 1325·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1997-01-29
·cited 6×
A person does not lose homestead tax exemption under Fla. Stat. § 196.101 when they are involuntarily removed from their home due to a medical condition and remain in a nursing home.